Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9331#issuecomment-151808021
**[Test build #44521 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44521/consoleFull)**
for PR 9331 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43246322
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SimpleExtensionService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43246273
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -51,6 +51,38 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-151827220
**[Test build #44525 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44525/consoleFull)**
for PR 8744 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9326#issuecomment-151837034
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9194#issuecomment-151842731
As a side note, I think the target user of `bin/spark-sql` is probably less
advanced and thus all the info logs probably aren't that useful. It doesn't
have to be in
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9312#issuecomment-151847282
Hm, OK. The thing is (unfortunately) a fair number of the copyright headers
aren't strictly correctly formatted. Many start with javadoc-style opening for
example.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9227#issuecomment-151819613
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43246543
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SchedulerExtensionService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-151827062
**[Test build #44526 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44526/consoleFull)**
for PR 5423 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#issuecomment-151827066
**[Test build #44524 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44524/consoleFull)**
for PR 9182 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9200#issuecomment-151832701
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9200#issuecomment-151832617
**[Test build #44520 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44520/consoleFull)**
for PR 9200 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9257#discussion_r43251769
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SecurityManager.scala ---
@@ -365,33 +366,37 @@ private[spark] class SecurityManager(sparkConf:
SparkConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9326#issuecomment-151839311
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43252081
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SchedulerExtensionService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9326#issuecomment-151841140
**[Test build #44527 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44527/consoleFull)**
for PR 9326 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9331#issuecomment-151824901
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9331#issuecomment-151824900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gliptak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9263#issuecomment-151833067
This last run had a different failure than the previous run with the same
code ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43253567
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SchedulerExtensionService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43254205
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -51,6 +51,38 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43254282
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/ExtensionServiceIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9330#issuecomment-151850104
**[Test build #44529 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44529/consoleFull)**
for PR 9330 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#issuecomment-151810105
**[Test build #44523 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44523/consoleFull)**
for PR 9196 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43246410
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/StubApplicationAttemptId.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/*
--- End diff --
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9330#discussion_r43249575
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GroupedIterator.scala ---
@@ -96,46 +97,64 @@ class GroupedIterator private(
ret
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9324#issuecomment-151836209
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#discussion_r43251011
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite.scala
---
@@ -245,4 +247,55 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9324
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9257#discussion_r43251680
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SecurityManager.scala ---
@@ -365,33 +366,37 @@ private[spark] class SecurityManager(sparkConf:
SparkConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9331#issuecomment-151806056
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9331#issuecomment-151806066
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9200#issuecomment-151804357
**[Test build #44520 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44520/consoleFull)**
for PR 9200 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43244486
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SchedulerExtensionService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9331#issuecomment-151824678
**[Test build #44521 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44521/consoleFull)**
for PR 9331 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9326#issuecomment-151839373
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9330#issuecomment-151847794
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user edvald commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8416#issuecomment-151805526
Hey all. Just ran into this bug when upgrading to 1.5.1, very glad it was
resolved! That said, I may not be able to run the updated code in my scenario -
is there a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#issuecomment-151808462
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#issuecomment-151808446
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9330#discussion_r43249637
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GroupedIteratorSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+package
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9257#issuecomment-151841537
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43252317
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SchedulerExtensionService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9257#issuecomment-151841517
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43253907
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -51,6 +51,38 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#issuecomment-151845427
Looks OK to me, mostly just style nits. Also, needs a rebase.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#issuecomment-151809495
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#issuecomment-151809518
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#discussion_r43243744
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2111,3 +2133,66 @@ setMethod("ntile",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions", "ntile",
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#issuecomment-151819415
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#issuecomment-151819418
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9196#issuecomment-151819173
**[Test build #44523 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44523/consoleFull)**
for PR 9196 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9227#issuecomment-151819610
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9227#issuecomment-151819457
**[Test build #44517 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44517/consoleFull)**
for PR 9227 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-151825740
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-151825768
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9330#discussion_r43249449
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GroupedIterator.scala ---
@@ -83,11 +83,12 @@ class GroupedIterator private(
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9330#discussion_r43249474
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GroupedIterator.scala ---
@@ -83,11 +83,12 @@ class GroupedIterator private(
Github user gliptak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9263#discussion_r43250312
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tests.py ---
@@ -76,7 +76,8 @@
pass
ser = PickleSerializer()
-sc = SparkContext('local[4]', "MLlib
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43251937
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SchedulerExtensionService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43252433
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SchedulerExtensionService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43254504
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/StubApplicationAttemptId.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9330#issuecomment-151847822
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9331
[SPARK-11369] [ML] [R] SparkR glm should support setting standardize
SparkR glm currently support :
```formula, family = c(âgaussianâ, âbinomialâ), data, lambda = 0,
alpha = 0```
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#discussion_r43242989
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite.scala
---
@@ -245,4 +247,55 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#issuecomment-151809791
**[Test build #44522 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44522/consoleFull)**
for PR 9232 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43244882
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SchedulerExtensionService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#issuecomment-151818616
**[Test build #44522 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44522/consoleFull)**
for PR 9232 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#issuecomment-151818863
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#issuecomment-151818859
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9302#issuecomment-151806442
I think further more we should provide a param named ```family``` for
```RFormula``` to indicate the estimator/model which will be applied to the
dataframe
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43244977
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SchedulerExtensionService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-151825736
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#issuecomment-151825730
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-151825769
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#issuecomment-151825741
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9200#issuecomment-151832704
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9294#issuecomment-151843230
I'm going to pick this into branch-1.5 too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9257#issuecomment-151843133
**[Test build #44528 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44528/consoleFull)**
for PR 9257 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r43253815
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -17,17 +17,17 @@
package
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9330#discussion_r43255063
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GroupedIterator.scala ---
@@ -83,11 +83,12 @@ class GroupedIterator private(
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9335
[SPARK-11376] [SQL] Removes duplicated `mutableRow` field
This PR fixes a mistake in the code generated by `GenerateColumnAccessor`.
Interestingly, although the code is illegal in Java (the class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9335#issuecomment-151863211
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7842#issuecomment-151863159
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7842#issuecomment-151863260
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9336#issuecomment-151870654
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#discussion_r43266858
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite.scala
---
@@ -245,4 +247,55 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7888#issuecomment-151875843
**[Test build #44534 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44534/consoleFull)**
for PR 7888 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-151876039
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-151875771
**[Test build #44526 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44526/consoleFull)**
for PR 5423 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#issuecomment-151877399
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-151878000
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9257#issuecomment-151880853
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7842#issuecomment-151883050
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user ted-yu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9332
SPARK-11371 Make "mean" an alias for "avg" operator
From Reynold in the thread 'Exception when using some aggregate operators'
(http://search-hadoop.com/m/q3RTt0xFr22nXB4/):
I don't think
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9335#issuecomment-151862392
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7842#issuecomment-151866430
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7842#issuecomment-151866425
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user manygrams opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9336
[SPARK-11378][STREAMING] make StreamingContext.awaitTerminationOrTimeout
return properly
This adds a failing test checking that `awaitTerminationOrTimeout` returns
the expected value, and then
1 - 100 of 679 matches
Mail list logo
