Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#issuecomment-152815974
Will do. Same JIRA or a new backport one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9298#issuecomment-152822556
Merged to master for 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-152802034
Looking a bit more closely, it looks like all existing implementations of
`MemoryConsumer.spill()` will only end up reporting the size of Tugnsten pages
that are
Github user ckadner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9291#issuecomment-152799657
@vanzin -- I pushed the nit pickity fixes :mag: -- Thanks :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#issuecomment-152822504
@choochootrain are you able to put together a small test like what @yhuai
mentions? then I think this is good to go.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9299#issuecomment-152822457
@jacek-lewandowski on one final re-read my last question is -- why does
`ApplicationDescription` still have `appUiUrl` then? in several cases it's just
copied into an
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9291#issuecomment-152797984
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9270#issuecomment-152802120
I'm traveling right now. Will take a look when I get back.
cc @davies also.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9388#issuecomment-152803978
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#issuecomment-152816395
and I've already gone and moved to strings. never mind.
the existing attempt IDs are nice for humans in the web UI, and potentially
in the rest, but don't
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9298
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-152800152
One bad complication: until we can _completely_ support off-heap memory for
execution, we need to perform separate accounting for on-heap and off-heap
memory, so
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9218#issuecomment-152797513
yes, I agree: throw a complex types not supported error message
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9379#issuecomment-152822945
Seems OK to me in that the release notes do not indicate any incompatible
changes, and the tests pass, and it fixes some bugs. We don't actually use Joda
time in Spark;
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9232#discussion_r43583071
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +145,76 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends SparkHadoopUtil
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9395#issuecomment-152833844
btw, the profiles that we used in hadoop 1 tests are `-Phadoop-1
-Dhadoop.version=1.2.1 -Pkinesis-asl -Phive-thriftserver -Phive`.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9395#issuecomment-152833780
cc @pwendell @srowen This is the new pr that upgrades Tachyon. I reverted
the original one, which caused hadoop 1 test failures.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152844736
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152844739
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152844573
**[Test build #44757 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44757/consoleFull)**
for PR 9384 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152846620
**[Test build #44759 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44759/consoleFull)**
for PR 9384 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9398#issuecomment-152848394
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152848385
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9398#issuecomment-152848384
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152849693
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152849703
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152849692
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9396#issuecomment-152850665
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9396#issuecomment-152850628
**[Test build #44758 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44758/consoleFull)**
for PR 9396 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9396#issuecomment-152850666
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9396#issuecomment-152837849
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9396#issuecomment-152839904
**[Test build #44758 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44758/consoleFull)**
for PR 9396 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9395#issuecomment-152841909
**[Test build #44756 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44756/consoleFull)**
for PR 9395 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9390#issuecomment-152841955
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9390#issuecomment-152841911
**[Test build #44753 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44753/consoleFull)**
for PR 9390 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152846476
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152846483
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9398
[SPARK-2] DAG visualization: display RDD callsite
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2133137/10870343/2a8cd070-807d-11e5-857a-4ebcace77b5b.png;>
@mateiz @sarutak
You can merge
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152848393
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152848369
@noel-smith thank you for the review. I rebase this PR with the mater and
then updated two parts.
- Add `@since` tags to `BGTClassifier` class and object
-
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-152850333
**[Test build #44755 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44755/consoleFull)**
for PR 9344 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-152850346
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9364#issuecomment-152853348
**[Test build #44764 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44764/consoleFull)**
for PR 9364 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9397#issuecomment-152841751
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152848582
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152848571
**[Test build #44760 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44760/consoleFull)**
for PR 9384 at commit
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152834222
The goal is to reduce memory consumption of local metrics test.
I want a QA run for latest change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9396#issuecomment-152837808
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152848645
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152848657
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152852553
**[Test build #44759 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44759/consoleFull)**
for PR 9384 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9395#issuecomment-152828790
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9395#issuecomment-152829433
**[Test build #44756 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44756/consoleFull)**
for PR 9395 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9291#issuecomment-152829339
**[Test build #44754 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44754/consoleFull)**
for PR 9291 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9390#issuecomment-152829398
**[Test build #44753 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44753/consoleFull)**
for PR 9390 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152834119
**[Test build #44757 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44757/consoleFull)**
for PR 9384 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152834147
The changes here are now unrelated it seems. Can you close this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152849701
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152849671
**[Test build #44762 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44762/consoleFull)**
for PR 8690 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152849659
**[Test build #44763 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44763/consoleFull)**
for PR 8690 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-152850349
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152833893
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152833927
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9291#issuecomment-152842124
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9291#issuecomment-152842091
**[Test build #44754 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44754/consoleFull)**
for PR 9291 at commit
Github user calvinjia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9395#issuecomment-152847168
@yhuai
Thanks for the the response! The last PR would pass with those parameters,
but and would only fail if the entire dev/runtests cycle was ran (specifically
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152848852
**[Test build #44762 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44762/consoleFull)**
for PR 8690 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8690#issuecomment-152848875
**[Test build #44763 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44763/consoleFull)**
for PR 8690 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9398#issuecomment-152848818
**[Test build #44761 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44761/consoleFull)**
for PR 9398 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9396
[SPARK-11440][CORE][STREAMING][BUILD] Declare rest of @Experimental items
non-experimental if they've existed since 1.2.0
Remove `@Experimental` annotations in core, streaming for items that
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9395#issuecomment-152841958
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9390#issuecomment-152841957
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9395#issuecomment-152841959
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152852593
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9343#discussion_r43586963
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/unresolved.scala
---
@@ -166,26 +166,58 @@ abstract class Star extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#issuecomment-152859815
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9218#issuecomment-152861491
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9218#issuecomment-152861497
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9291
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-152865071
**[Test build #44768 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44768/consoleFull)**
for PR 9399 at commit
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9378#issuecomment-152866685
@gliptak Why the code changes do not match with the title? I think the
SPARK-11382 should fix mllib-decision-tree.md and mllib-ensembles.md.
---
If your project is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-152867810
**[Test build #44770 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44770/consoleFull)**
for PR 9344 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152868378
**[Test build #44772 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44772/consoleFull)**
for PR 9384 at commit
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9384#issuecomment-152868318
bq. what does this have to do with memory
The answer is in SaveStageAndTaskInfo. See the following
```
* A simple listener that saves all task infos and task
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9218#issuecomment-152868688
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9400#issuecomment-152868699
**[Test build #44773 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44773/consoleFull)**
for PR 9400 at commit
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8923#issuecomment-152869987
I prefer to fix this by changing the result type of
`getAncestorShuffleDependencies(rdd: RDD[_])` to be `Set[ShuffleDependency[_,
_, _]]` and the result of that
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#issuecomment-152870622
BTW, if you're keeping `bindToYarn` and friends, you could change
`applicationId` and `applicationAttemptId` to return the values you're setting
there, which also means
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9401#issuecomment-152870725
**[Test build #44774 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44774/consoleFull)**
for PR 9401 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9388#issuecomment-152871725
**[Test build #44765 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44765/consoleFull)**
for PR 9388 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-152872738
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#issuecomment-152872862
**[Test build #44776 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44776/consoleFull)**
for PR 9399 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9402#issuecomment-152874464
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9276#issuecomment-152877559
**[Test build #44781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44781/consoleFull)**
for PR 9276 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#discussion_r43590253
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -266,26 +267,39 @@ private[sql] object
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#discussion_r43590460
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -295,18 +309,20 @@ private[sql] object
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#discussion_r43590582
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/FilteredScanSuite.scala ---
@@ -44,16 +44,46 @@ case class SimpleFilteredScan(from: Int, to:
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#discussion_r43590585
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/ParquetHadoopFsRelationSuite.scala
---
@@ -145,14 +145,16 @@ class ParquetHadoopFsRelationSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9402#issuecomment-152879812
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9399#discussion_r43590547
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/FilteredScanSuite.scala ---
@@ -101,6 +130,10 @@ object FiltersPushed {
var list:
1 - 100 of 420 matches
Mail list logo
