Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9597#issuecomment-156794866
Hi @koeninger , how about this change? Still keeping the mapping relations,
so offset range can be retrieved through partitionId, just filter out empty
partition.
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9718#discussion_r44868778
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -267,6 +267,55 @@ class CodeGenContext {
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9718#discussion_r44868784
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -267,6 +267,55 @@ class CodeGenContext {
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9718#issuecomment-156789726
LGTM, and some minor comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9720#issuecomment-156789931
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user kevinyu98 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9720
[SPARK-11447][SQL] change NullType to StringType during binaryComparison
between NullType and StringType
During executing PromoteStrings rule, if one side of binaryComparison is
StringType and
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9684#issuecomment-156793955
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9712#discussion_r44871929
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/RowEncoderSuite.scala
---
@@ -68,7 +117,36 @@ class RowEncoderSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9722#issuecomment-156814081
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9099#issuecomment-156814877
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9099#issuecomment-156816289
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9099#issuecomment-156816290
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9712#discussion_r44872999
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/RowEncoderSuite.scala
---
@@ -68,7 +117,36 @@ class RowEncoderSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9099#issuecomment-156816256
**[Test build #45953 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45953/consoleFull)**
for PR 9099 at commit
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9722
[SPARK-11689] [ML] Add user guide and example code for LDA under spark.ml
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11689
Add simple user guide for LDA under spark.ml and example
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9722#issuecomment-156812972
**[Test build #45951 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45951/consoleFull)**
for PR 9722 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9722#issuecomment-156814056
**[Test build #45951 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45951/consoleFull)**
for PR 9722 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9722#issuecomment-156814083
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9099#issuecomment-156814876
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9099#issuecomment-156814873
**[Test build #45952 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45952/consoleFull)**
for PR 9099 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9099#issuecomment-156815446
**[Test build #45953 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45953/consoleFull)**
for PR 9099 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9721#issuecomment-156815860
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9721#issuecomment-156815861
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9721#issuecomment-156815828
**[Test build #45950 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45950/consoleFull)**
for PR 9721 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9671#issuecomment-156819436
cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9664#discussion_r44873198
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveContext.scala ---
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ class HiveContext private[hive](
// Note that
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9597#issuecomment-156822484
Are you 100% sure that all uses of the partition array only use the index
associated with the individual Partition, and not its position in the array?
At
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-156822427
**[Test build #45954 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45954/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
Github user zhonghaihua commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9483#issuecomment-156810307
Hi @zhichao-li ,thanks for doing this.I got a problem of scanning
partitions slowly,and I apply this patch to my spark version.In my case:
* Before I apply this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9721#issuecomment-156810256
**[Test build #45950 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45950/consoleFull)**
for PR 9721 at commit
Github user zhonghaihua commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9483#issuecomment-156810714
Hi @zhichao-li ,thanks for doing this.I got a problem of scanning
partitions slowly,and I apply this patch to my spark version.In my case:
* Before I apply this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9264#issuecomment-156810989
**[Test build #2060 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2060/consoleFull)**
for PR 9264 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9264#issuecomment-156801643
@reggert yeah, with thousands of tests, some of them integration-style
tests, flakiness is a pretty regular occurrence. You can see a number of PRs to
improve indivudal
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9264#issuecomment-156802784
**[Test build #2060 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2060/consoleFull)**
for PR 9264 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9684#issuecomment-156802883
**[Test build #45948 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45948/consoleFull)**
for PR 9684 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9597#issuecomment-156806763
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9597#issuecomment-156806762
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9684#issuecomment-15686
**[Test build #45948 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45948/consoleFull)**
for PR 9684 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9597#issuecomment-156803004
**[Test build #45949 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45949/consoleFull)**
for PR 9597 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9719#issuecomment-156802990
**[Test build #45947 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45947/consoleFull)**
for PR 9719 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9597#issuecomment-156806725
**[Test build #45949 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45949/consoleFull)**
for PR 9597 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9719#issuecomment-156807487
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9719#issuecomment-156807488
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9719#issuecomment-156807462
**[Test build #45947 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45947/consoleFull)**
for PR 9719 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9684#issuecomment-156811167
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9721
[SPARK-11744][Launcher] Fix print version throw exception when using
pyspark shell
Exception details can be seen here
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11744).
You can merge this
Github user xwu0226 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542#issuecomment-156845293
Accidentially pushed another JIRA's code together. . I am backing it out
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jbonofre commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#issuecomment-156845898
PR rebased.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#issuecomment-156846400
**[Test build #45957 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45957/consoleFull)**
for PR 9165 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8872#issuecomment-156846731
**[Test build #45958 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45958/consoleFull)**
for PR 8872 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9546#issuecomment-156846877
I think that this has caused the
"org.apache.spark.scheduler.EventLoggingListenerSuite.End-to-end event logging"
test to become flaky in Jenkins.
I believe
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9700#issuecomment-156841942
Going to merge this first. I will submit followup prs if there are any
posthoc feedback.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542#issuecomment-156842519
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user reggert commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9264#issuecomment-156844499
@srowen Okay. I was just worried I was going to get blamed for breaking
something. ;-)
What's left to do here?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9546#issuecomment-156850070
I checked
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/Spark-Master-Maven-with-YARN/HADOOP_PROFILE=hadoop-2.4,label=spark-test/4122/consoleFull
back till:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542#issuecomment-156850658
**[Test build #45959 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45959/consoleFull)**
for PR 9542 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9546#issuecomment-156851581
Look at the Master SBT build; there's definitely a regression:
Github user selvinsource commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9057#issuecomment-156852089
@yinxusen
https://github.com/selvinsource/spark-pmml-exporter-validator/tree/logistic_regression_multi_class
I tested both multinomial and bernoulli.
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542#issuecomment-156853749
LGTM pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9671#issuecomment-156854295
Merge to branch 1.5.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9671#issuecomment-156854870
Merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9664#discussion_r44877679
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveContext.scala ---
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ class HiveContext private[hive](
// Note that
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9719#issuecomment-156855129
LGTM. Merge to branch 1.6 and master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9719
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9272#issuecomment-156866902
Thanks! Merging to master and branch 1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user reggert commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9264#issuecomment-156868899
I'm not particularly happy about the (internal) API exposed by
`ComplexFutureAction`. Having callers instantiate the action and then mutate it
by calling the `run` and
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#discussion_r44880055
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResultGetterSuite.scala ---
@@ -119,5 +124,47 @@ class TaskResultGetterSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#discussion_r44880126
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResultGetterSuite.scala ---
@@ -119,5 +124,47 @@ class TaskResultGetterSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9718
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9546#issuecomment-156866484
Planning to send out a PR to fix the regression by keeping count of queued
events first time seeing the stop flag.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156870251
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156877667
**[Test build #45962 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45962/consoleFull)**
for PR 9723 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9060#issuecomment-156879272
I saw accidently `TODO Adds test case for reading dictionary encoded
decimals written as 'FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY'`.
I will also add this test in the following
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#issuecomment-156856529
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#issuecomment-156856532
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#issuecomment-156856492
**[Test build #45957 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45957/consoleFull)**
for PR 9165 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8872#issuecomment-156858796
**[Test build #45958 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45958/consoleFull)**
for PR 8872 at commit
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9546#issuecomment-156867526
Cloning git repo was extremely slow.
Here is proposed fix:
```
diff --git
a/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AsynchronousListenerBus.scala
Github user reggert commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9264#discussion_r44879232
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/AsyncRDDActionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ import org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542#issuecomment-156868010
**[Test build #45959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45959/consoleFull)**
for PR 9542 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542#issuecomment-156868048
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542#issuecomment-156868046
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user xwu0226 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542#issuecomment-156869030
@yhuai I did not know that we should not update the resources/data
directory.. I thought the test data files were added along the way by
contributors. Thanks for
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9679#issuecomment-156856575
**[Test build #45960 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45960/consoleFull)**
for PR 9679 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#discussion_r44880215
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TestUtils.scala ---
@@ -78,15 +79,15 @@ private[spark] object TestUtils {
}
/**
- *
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9687#issuecomment-156883379
**[Test build #45965 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45965/consoleFull)**
for PR 9687 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9717#issuecomment-156888382
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156889821
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156889817
**[Test build #45968 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45968/consoleFull)**
for PR 9723 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156889820
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9724#discussion_r44883818
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonParsingOptionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9724#discussion_r44883828
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JSONOptions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9060#issuecomment-156891545
**[Test build #45964 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45964/consoleFull)**
for PR 9060 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-156891548
**[Test build #45973 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45973/consoleFull)**
for PR 9723 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9060#issuecomment-156891628
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9060#issuecomment-156891627
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9724#issuecomment-156891508
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9658#issuecomment-156892687
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9724#issuecomment-156892716
**[Test build #2061 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2061/consoleFull)**
for PR 9724 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9724#discussion_r44884636
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -227,6 +227,15 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sqlContext:
1 - 100 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
