Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10554#issuecomment-169278782
**[Test build #48847 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48847/consoleFull)**
for PR 10554 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10523#issuecomment-169284609
@yhuai yes and it's a pg-specific thing. I agree that we add it as a data
source option instead of sql conf. If the fix is acceptable, I'll fix this pr
to add a data
Github user vijaykiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#discussion_r48945561
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/fpm.py ---
@@ -67,12 +67,15 @@ class FPGrowth(object):
def train(cls, data, minSupport=0.3, numPartitions=-1):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10513#issuecomment-169302080
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10513#issuecomment-169302078
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10513#issuecomment-169301945
**[Test build #48850 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48850/consoleFull)**
for PR 10513 at commit
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10562#issuecomment-169274323
@QiangCai We have many conflicts against `branch-1.6` so I'd merge this
into only `master` for now.
If you want merge this into `branch-1.6` please feel free open
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10552#issuecomment-169273957
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10552#issuecomment-169273963
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vijaykiran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10598#issuecomment-169275901
@BryanCutler Thanks for the review, I added a new commit - will review
update other two PRs with 100 fill-column as well.
---
If your project is set up for it,
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10618
[SPARK-12673][UI] Add missing uri prepending for job description
Otherwise the url will be failed to proxy to the right one if in YARN mode.
Here is the screenshot:
**
for PR 10603 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10585#discussion_r48936240
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/StageInfo.scala ---
@@ -61,6 +61,21 @@ class StageInfo(
"running"
}
}
GitHub user SaintBacchus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10617
[Streaming][UI][SPARK-12672]Use the uiRoot function instead of default root
path to gain the streaming batch url.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10554#discussion_r48938992
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaPairRDD.scala
---
@@ -288,17 +288,18 @@ class JavaPairRDD[K, V](val rdd: RDD[(K, V)])
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-169281764
**[Test build #48848 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48848/consoleFull)**
for PR 10570 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10603#issuecomment-169281734
**[Test build #2333 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2333/consoleFull)**
for PR 10603 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-169281772
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-169281770
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10615#issuecomment-169284984
**[Test build #48852 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48852/consoleFull)**
for PR 10615 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10618#issuecomment-169302612
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10618#issuecomment-169302513
**[Test build #48849 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48849/consoleFull)**
for PR 10618 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#discussion_r48948491
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveQl.scala ---
@@ -1212,7 +1212,12 @@
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10613#issuecomment-169266714
Thanks for your suggestion. I've update the title and corresponding JIRA.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-169279737
**[Test build #48848 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48848/consoleFull)**
for PR 10570 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10615#issuecomment-169285294
**[Test build #48852 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48852/consoleFull)**
for PR 10615 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10615#issuecomment-169285302
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10615#issuecomment-169285300
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#discussion_r48951109
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/WriterContainer.scala
---
@@ -335,6 +339,117 @@ private[sql] class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10557
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10609#issuecomment-169270419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10609#issuecomment-169270414
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10617#issuecomment-169271840
**[Test build #48846 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48846/consoleFull)**
for PR 10617 at commit
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10562#issuecomment-169272584
Merging this into `master` and `branch-1.6`. Thanks @QiangCai !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10613#issuecomment-169277161
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10613#issuecomment-169277163
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10615#issuecomment-169285927
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10562#issuecomment-169270903
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-169271043
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10587#issuecomment-169270733
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-169270859
**[Test build #48841 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48841/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10562
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10618#issuecomment-169302616
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#issuecomment-169305716
**[Test build #48853 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48853/consoleFull)**
for PR 10583 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10552#issuecomment-169267284
**[Test build #48845 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48845/consoleFull)**
for PR 10552 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10557#issuecomment-169267439
Merged. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-169271044
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10552#issuecomment-169273855
**[Test build #48845 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48845/consoleFull)**
for PR 10552 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-169277879
(Nevermind -- I backed out the `commons-codec` change for now.)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10618#issuecomment-169280416
**[Test build #48849 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48849/consoleFull)**
for PR 10618 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10615#issuecomment-169285920
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10609#issuecomment-169270236
**[Test build #48843 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48843/consoleFull)**
for PR 10609 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48940364
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystQl.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,969 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10613#issuecomment-169276940
**[Test build #48844 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48844/consoleFull)**
for PR 10613 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10617#issuecomment-169281565
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10617#issuecomment-169281563
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10513#issuecomment-169281417
**[Test build #48850 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48850/consoleFull)**
for PR 10513 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10617#issuecomment-169281442
**[Test build #48846 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48846/consoleFull)**
for PR 10617 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#issuecomment-169317846
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#issuecomment-169317848
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#issuecomment-169317899
**[Test build #48856 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48856/consoleFull)**
for PR 10498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#issuecomment-169331417
**[Test build #48859 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48859/consoleFull)**
for PR 10604 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#issuecomment-169309910
**[Test build #48854 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48854/consoleFull)**
for PR 10498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10554#issuecomment-169328695
**[Test build #48847 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48847/consoleFull)**
for PR 10554 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#issuecomment-169330013
you can review the last commit to ignore bucket write part.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48951342
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -451,6 +452,19 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
doc = "When true,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#discussion_r48951242
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -351,7 +365,18 @@ abstract class OutputWriterFactory extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48951594
--- Diff: dev/deps/spark-deps-hadoop-2.2 ---
@@ -5,8 +5,7 @@ activation-1.1.jar
akka-actor_2.10-2.3.11.jar
akka-remote_2.10-2.3.11.jar
Github user zero323 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9986#issuecomment-169327083
@thunterdb Done. I am not sure if a separate test is justified. It could be
better to add a second round to `test_gmm`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10554#issuecomment-169332682
**[Test build #2335 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2335/consoleFull)**
for PR 10554 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10513#issuecomment-169332761
**[Test build #2336 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2336/consoleFull)**
for PR 10513 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48951642
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystQl.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,961 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10615#issuecomment-169314710
Is this going to require the new parser JAR on the classpath everywhere, or
will everything excluding CSV parsing still work without it?
---
If your project is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10587#issuecomment-169321253
**[Test build #2334 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2334/consoleFull)**
for PR 10587 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-169322620
**[Test build #48857 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48857/consoleFull)**
for PR 10570 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10618#issuecomment-169323843
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#issuecomment-169326184
**[Test build #48853 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48853/consoleFull)**
for PR 10583 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#issuecomment-169313888
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#discussion_r48953481
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/WriterContainer.scala
---
@@ -335,6 +339,121 @@ private[sql] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#issuecomment-169326444
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#issuecomment-169326441
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10554#issuecomment-169328843
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10554#issuecomment-169328832
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user Wenpei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10587#issuecomment-169315605
thanks,@srowen
@rxin There is no Jenkins report, anything need for me?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#issuecomment-169313791
**[Test build #48854 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48854/consoleFull)**
for PR 10498 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#issuecomment-169313893
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8533#discussion_r48953313
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskLocation.scala
---
@@ -35,16 +37,28 @@ case class ExecutorCacheTaskLocation(override val
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10587#issuecomment-169321019
**[Test build #2334 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2334/consoleFull)**
for PR 10587 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10618#issuecomment-169325310
**[Test build #48858 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48858/consoleFull)**
for PR 10618 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10589#discussion_r48960725
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/Benchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#issuecomment-169338192
**[Test build #48856 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48856/consoleFull)**
for PR 10498 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10605#discussion_r48966227
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Window.scala ---
@@ -307,27 +314,63 @@ case class Window(
// Collect all
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-169362292
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user QiangCai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10562#issuecomment-169369194
OK. I have created another PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10619.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10541#issuecomment-169372469
@rxin SQL generation dedicated test cases are added in
`HiveQLSQLBuilderSuite`. Bugs found by round-trip tests in
`HiveCompatibilitySuite` are covered there.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10604#issuecomment-169353471
**[Test build #48859 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48859/consoleFull)**
for PR 10604 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10605#discussion_r48967411
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Window.scala ---
@@ -283,23 +287,26 @@ case class Window(
val grouping =
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-169361992
**[Test build #48857 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48857/consoleFull)**
for PR 10570 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10554#issuecomment-169365786
**[Test build #2335 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2335/consoleFull)**
for PR 10554 at commit
1 - 100 of 633 matches
Mail list logo
