Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-170220929
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#issuecomment-170247768
Yeah I think this is correct. The comment that was here previously
suggested this was related to use of `Optional` in the public API, but I think
it needs to stay in
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#issuecomment-170230870
I'm not sure about that; I believe Guava is supposed to be `provided` here.
Does it fix the issue though? @vanzin how is this one supposed to work re:
shading now that
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#issuecomment-170238716
Yes, it does. I'm using the latest revision + the change. It's a serious
issue since standalone Master cannot be started as of today.
I do not know how
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10675
[SPARK-5273] [MLLIB] [DOCS] Improve documentation examples for
LinearRegression
Use a much smaller step size in LinearRegressionWithSGD MLlib examples to
achieve a reasonable RMSE.
Our
Github user naveenminchu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10474#discussion_r49264010
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/InferSchema.scala
---
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ private[json] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10675#issuecomment-170240593
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10675#issuecomment-170240595
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user qbwu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10676
[SPARK-12737]Decrease the redundant activeIds sent to remote mirrors in
"aggregateMessagesWithActiveSet"
JIRA Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12737
An optimization to the
Github user naveenminchu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10403#discussion_r49264644
--- Diff:
docker-integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/MySQLIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -150,4 +150,91 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10675#issuecomment-170240020
**[Test build #49046 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49046/consoleFull)**
for PR 10675 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10676#issuecomment-170241170
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10675#issuecomment-170240566
**[Test build #49046 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49046/consoleFull)**
for PR 10675 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10672#issuecomment-170224807
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10672#issuecomment-170224800
**[Test build #49041 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49041/consoleFull)**
for PR 10672 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10672#issuecomment-170224808
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674
[SPARK-12736][CORE][DEPLOY] Standalone Master cannot be started due tâ¦
â¦o NoClassDefFoundError: org/spark-project/guava/collect/Maps
/cc @srowen @rxin
You can merge this pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#issuecomment-170228387
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user nikit-os commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10294#issuecomment-170237564
Kafka 0.9 introduce new consumer which eliminates the dependence on
Zookeeper. It replaces "high-level" and "low-level" consumers and makes working
with Kafka much
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#issuecomment-170282770
The latest change contains the fix for multi-child Union ALL in conversion
from logical plan to SQL after introducing SQL Generation:
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10673#issuecomment-170266531
There was once talk of leaving the `spark-ec2` executable in here and just
downloading the script from the AMPLab repo on execution. That way users can
continue to
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10403#discussion_r49266410
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/MySQLDialect.scala ---
@@ -41,6 +41,26 @@ private case object MySQLDialect extends JdbcDialect
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#issuecomment-170267761
Jenkins, this is ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10673#issuecomment-170267628
Given the scope of other deprecations / changes in Spark 2.0, I personally
think that it's okay to leave out the wrapper script which forwards to the new
repo. Note
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#discussion_r49266568
--- Diff: network/common/pom.xml ---
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
com.google.guava
guava
+ compile
--- End diff --
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#issuecomment-170269614
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#issuecomment-170269616
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10670
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#issuecomment-170283685
**[Test build #49048 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49048/consoleFull)**
for PR 10577 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10677#issuecomment-170287921
**[Test build #49049 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49049/consoleFull)**
for PR 10677 at commit
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10677
[SPARK-12706] [SQL] grouping() and grouping_id()
Grouping() returns a column is aggregated or not, grouping_id() returns the
aggregation levels.
grouping()/grouping_id() could be used with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10677#issuecomment-170287980
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10677#issuecomment-170287977
**[Test build #49049 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49049/consoleFull)**
for PR 10677 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10677#issuecomment-170287981
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#discussion_r49266731
--- Diff: network/common/pom.xml ---
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
com.google.guava
guava
+ compile
--- End diff --
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#issuecomment-170269576
**[Test build #49047 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49047/consoleFull)**
for PR 10674 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10403#discussion_r49266392
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/MySQLDialect.scala ---
@@ -41,6 +41,26 @@ private case object MySQLDialect extends JdbcDialect
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10403#discussion_r49266387
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/MySQLDialect.scala ---
@@ -41,6 +41,26 @@ private case object MySQLDialect extends JdbcDialect
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10474#issuecomment-170268671
Can you add tests and also make changes to the write path (parquet/orc)?
Otherwise, when you write a json dataset with null type to parquet, it will
fail.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#issuecomment-170268730
**[Test build #49047 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49047/consoleFull)**
for PR 10674 at commit
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#issuecomment-170268746
I'm using the following commands to do the build:
```
$ ./dev/change-scala-version.sh 2.11
$ ./build/mvn -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.6
Github user pjfanning commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10403#issuecomment-170256145
Hi Naveen - your new tests look good to me. I do notice though that you
probably need to resync with master due to conflicts (there is a 'This branch
has conflicts
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#issuecomment-170268121
@jaceklaskowski, to help me understand the scope of this bug could you tell
us how you built Spark in your failing example? Did you use the Maven or SBT
builds?
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10673#issuecomment-170268088
Sounds fine with me and I agree with your position. :+1:
I hope this makes it easier for people to contribute to spark-ec2.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user BrianLondon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10256#issuecomment-170270526
Manifest updated. Is there documented somewhere what all the tests Travis
runs are? It seems to differ from what's described at
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10403#discussion_r49266372
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/MySQLDialect.scala ---
@@ -41,6 +41,26 @@ private case object MySQLDialect extends JdbcDialect
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10403#discussion_r49266355
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/MySQLDialect.scala ---
@@ -41,6 +41,26 @@ private case object MySQLDialect extends JdbcDialect
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10403#discussion_r49266438
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JdbcDialects.scala ---
@@ -90,6 +90,15 @@ abstract class JdbcDialect extends Serializable {
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10403#discussion_r49266453
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -219,13 +219,21 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10677#issuecomment-170298048
**[Test build #49050 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49050/consoleFull)**
for PR 10677 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#issuecomment-170291824
**[Test build #49048 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49048/consoleFull)**
for PR 10577 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#issuecomment-170291891
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#issuecomment-170291889
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10677#issuecomment-170298109
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10677#issuecomment-170298110
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10677#issuecomment-170291988
**[Test build #49050 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49050/consoleFull)**
for PR 10677 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10638#issuecomment-170305993
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10669#issuecomment-170308143
**[Test build #2356 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2356/consoleFull)**
for PR 10669 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10669#issuecomment-170308345
**[Test build #2356 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2356/consoleFull)**
for PR 10669 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#discussion_r49271363
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -523,14 +523,37 @@ class Analyzer(
def apply(plan:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10638#issuecomment-170299362
**[Test build #49051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49051/consoleFull)**
for PR 10638 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#discussion_r49270677
--- Diff: network/common/pom.xml ---
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
com.google.guava
guava
+ compile
--- End diff --
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10674#discussion_r49270748
--- Diff: network/common/pom.xml ---
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
com.google.guava
guava
+ compile
--- End diff --
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10638#issuecomment-170305994
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10638#issuecomment-170305946
**[Test build #49051 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49051/consoleFull)**
for PR 10638 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678
[SPARK-12705] [SQL] AnalysisException: Sorting columns are not in Project
of Window Function
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12705
Unable to resolve sorting columns
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-170308011
**[Test build #49052 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49052/consoleFull)**
for PR 10678 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#discussion_r49271406
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -523,14 +523,37 @@ class Analyzer(
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10669#issuecomment-170312652
**[Test build #2357 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2357/consoleFull)**
for PR 10669 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10665
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10673#issuecomment-170313629
@shivaram I'm going to merge this one first. Let me know if there is a
problem with the move. I can easily revert this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10673
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#discussion_r49271654
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -523,14 +523,37 @@ class Analyzer(
def apply(plan:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#discussion_r49271651
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -523,14 +523,37 @@ class Analyzer(
def apply(plan:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#discussion_r49271668
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -523,14 +523,37 @@ class Analyzer(
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-170315806
**[Test build #49052 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49052/consoleFull)**
for PR 10678 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-170315845
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-170315844
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10669#issuecomment-170316548
**[Test build #2357 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2357/consoleFull)**
for PR 10669 at commit
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10679
[SPARK-12612][PROJECT-INFRA] Backport dev/test-dependencies script to
branch-1.5
This patch backports the `dev/test-dependencies` script (from #10461) to
branch-1.5.
You can merge this pull
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10680
[SPARK-10359][PROJECT-INFRA] Backport dev/test-dependencies script to
branch-1.5
This patch backports the `dev/test-dependencies` script (from #10461) to
branch-1.6.
You can merge this pull
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10672#issuecomment-170320386
I've opened two pull requests to backport the `dev/test-dependencies` infra
to branch-1.5 and 1.6, which should allow me to backport this change as well.
I
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10672#issuecomment-170320650
Actually, I might choose to handle those separately in a followup next week
in order to have more time to think through a few additional cases, including
the
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10672#issuecomment-170320786
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-170321338
**[Test build #49054 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49054/consoleFull)**
for PR 10678 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10679#issuecomment-170321648
[Test build #49053 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49053/console)
for PR 10679 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10680#issuecomment-170321675
**[Test build #49055 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49055/consoleFull)**
for PR 10680 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10679#issuecomment-170321656
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10679#issuecomment-170321624
[Test build #49053 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49053/consoleFull)
for PR 10679 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10679#issuecomment-170321658
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10671#issuecomment-170209013
**[Test build #49042 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49042/consoleFull)**
for PR 10671 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-170208865
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-170208817
**[Test build #49038 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49038/consoleFull)**
for PR 10630 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-170208866
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10670#issuecomment-170209235
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10670#issuecomment-170209234
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10671#issuecomment-170209144
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10671#issuecomment-170209143
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-170209280
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10670#issuecomment-170209126
**[Test build #49040 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49040/consoleFull)**
for PR 10670 at commit
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
