Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11629
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11629#issuecomment-194720804
Merging in master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-194720152
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-194720154
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-194720120
**[Test build #52818 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52818/consoleFull)**
for PR 11565 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-194719424
@Sarutak, I think that join and sort may generate Java code by own
routines. Can I address other operations in other future PRs incrementally?
---
If your project is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-194718830
**[Test build #52820 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52820/consoleFull)**
for PR 11565 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11500#issuecomment-194718630
Mostly eyeballing it here, but it looks reasonable to me given its goal.
You'll know a lot more about what needs to happen to make this work than I
would.
---
If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#discussion_r55643000
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -384,9 +374,25 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11500#discussion_r55643032
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConf.scala ---
@@ -653,7 +653,9 @@ private[spark] object SparkConf extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11618#issuecomment-194717639
**[Test build #52819 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52819/consoleFull)**
for PR 11618 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#discussion_r55642840
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -384,9 +374,25 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11591#issuecomment-194716774
Seems OK to me, fWIW
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11618#discussion_r55642742
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +63,25 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11629#issuecomment-194715899
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11629#issuecomment-194715896
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11178#discussion_r55642612
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/AbstractCommandBuilder.java ---
@@ -146,10 +146,38 @@ void addOptionString(List cmd, String
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11443#issuecomment-194715480
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11178#discussion_r55642583
--- Diff: dev/mima ---
@@ -24,24 +24,63 @@ set -e
FWDIR="$(cd "`dirname "$0"`"/..; pwd)"
cd "$FWDIR"
-echo -e "q\n" | build/sbt
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11629#issuecomment-194715507
**[Test build #52817 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52817/consoleFull)**
for PR 11629 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11443#issuecomment-194715479
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11443#issuecomment-194715305
**[Test build #52814 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52814/consoleFull)**
for PR 11443 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#discussion_r55642440
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -384,9 +374,25 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#discussion_r55642460
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -384,9 +374,25 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#discussion_r55642323
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -384,9 +374,25 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#discussion_r55642338
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -384,9 +374,25 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11615#discussion_r55642314
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -270,9 +270,21 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11617#issuecomment-194713989
Certainly, the lapack methods modify their arguments in order to return a
value. That's by design of course. And the javadoc for this method indicates
that the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#discussion_r55642207
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -384,9 +374,25 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11547#issuecomment-194713380
@JeremyNixon thanks! Merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-194713298
In the latest PR: we added two more cases/rules into the Optimizer.
- After column pruning, if `Window` could contain an empty
`windowExpressions` list, we
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11547#discussion_r55642006
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/ml/train_validation_split.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11547
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#issuecomment-194709904
This needs a rebase anyway so I left a few more comments. Otherwise LGTM
pending tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#discussion_r55641453
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleanerSuite.scala ---
@@ -579,17 +579,20 @@ class CleanerTester(
private def
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11624#issuecomment-194709645
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#discussion_r55641420
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleanerSuite.scala ---
@@ -442,25 +442,25 @@ class CleanerTester(
checkpointIds: Seq[Long] =
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-194709320
**[Test build #52818 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52818/consoleFull)**
for PR 11565 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#issuecomment-194703169
**[Test build #2626 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2626/consoleFull)**
for PR 11628 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#issuecomment-194700395
**[Test build #2626 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2626/consoleFull)**
for PR 11628 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#issuecomment-194700039
LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#discussion_r55639455
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -454,10 +478,16 @@ private[spark] class Client(
* (3) whether to
Github user tejasapatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#issuecomment-194694929
@rxin : Thanks for the review. I have updated the PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#issuecomment-194694816
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#discussion_r55639115
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PipedRDD.scala ---
@@ -133,23 +134,30 @@ private[spark] class PipedRDD[T: ClassTag](
// Start
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-194694790
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#issuecomment-194694815
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-194694793
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#issuecomment-194694692
**[Test build #52816 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52816/consoleFull)**
for PR 9 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#discussion_r55639013
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PipedRDD.scala ---
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ private[spark] class PipedRDD[T: ClassTag](
val
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-194694601
**[Test build #52815 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52815/consoleFull)**
for PR 11565 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-194693889
**[Test build #52805 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52805/consoleFull)**
for PR 11301 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-194693946
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-194693948
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-194692523
I made a mistake in previous benchmark for `withReplacement = false`.
Update benchmark here.
Without generated code for sample():
Intel(R)
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11443#issuecomment-194691377
I talked with Michael - we thought it's fine to throw an exception that
contains the query plan. That enables the debugging case and we don't need the
lazy analysis
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11443#issuecomment-194691016
@yhuai `HiveCompatibilitySuite` passed both locally and on Jenkins.
@marmbrus @rxin OK, then I'll merge this one as soon as Jenkins passes. An
update of the
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#discussion_r55637701
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -387,6 +381,14 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#issuecomment-194688064
Thanks - looking pretty good. Just some minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#discussion_r55637448
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PipedRDD.scala ---
@@ -133,23 +134,30 @@ private[spark] class PipedRDD[T: ClassTag](
// Start a
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11629#issuecomment-194687743
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#discussion_r55637430
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PipedRDD.scala ---
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ private[spark] class PipedRDD[T: ClassTag](
val proc =
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#issuecomment-194687095
Can you update the description to actually describe the problem? It'd be
great if it is understandable without having to cross-reference the JIRA ticket.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11629#issuecomment-194686722
**[Test build #52817 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52817/consoleFull)**
for PR 11629 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11629#issuecomment-194686733
LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-194686319
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-194686321
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11629
[MINOR][SQL] Replace DataFrameWriter.stream() with startStream() in
comments.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
According to #11627 , this PR replace
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-194686038
**[Test build #52812 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52812/consoleFull)**
for PR 11578 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-194684792
I agree that SparkR should not "require" ggplot...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#issuecomment-194684818
test it please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r55636801
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -137,6 +138,17 @@ class KMeansModel private[ml] (
@Since("1.6.0")
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#issuecomment-194684711
**[Test build #52816 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52816/consoleFull)**
for PR 9 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#discussion_r55636439
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -387,6 +381,14 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11555#issuecomment-194683067
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11555#issuecomment-194683068
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11555#issuecomment-194682902
**[Test build #52813 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52813/consoleFull)**
for PR 11555 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11618#discussion_r55636107
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +63,25 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r55636113
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -137,6 +138,18 @@ class KMeansModel private[ml] (
@Since("1.6.0")
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#discussion_r55636068
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -387,6 +381,14 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11581#issuecomment-194675931
@jkbradley Make a pass. LGTM except for the minor issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#discussion_r55635356
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/config.scala ---
@@ -177,14 +177,26 @@ package object config {
private[spark] val
Github user lw-lin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11626#issuecomment-194672903
@rxin thanks !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11626
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#discussion_r55634864
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -387,6 +381,14 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11626#issuecomment-194671489
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11586#discussion_r55634802
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -613,7 +613,12 @@ class DAGScheduler(
properties: Properties):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-194669064
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-194668856
**[Test build #52790 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52790/consoleFull)**
for PR 11565 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-194669060
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11627#issuecomment-194669186
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11627
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11484#issuecomment-194668304
@davies Comments are addressed. Please let me know if you have further
comments. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user wilson8 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#discussion_r55634450
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleanerSuite.scala ---
@@ -586,10 +586,12 @@ class CleanerTester(
}
private
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-194667443
@davies What do your think? Do we want to use generated codes for sample()
in wholestage codegen Sample operator?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11627#issuecomment-194667169
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11534#issuecomment-194667138
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11534#issuecomment-194667136
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11627#issuecomment-194667168
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11534#issuecomment-19444
**[Test build #52787 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52787/consoleFull)**
for PR 11534 at commit
1 - 100 of 801 matches
Mail list logo
