Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user flyjy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11812#issuecomment-215632760
@srowen The PR with unit testing passed after rebasing master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215632671
Merging in master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12426#issuecomment-215632614
@mengxr - We should add details about this in SparkR programming guide. Can
you add this to the QA/docs JIRA we have for 2.0 ?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user taku-k commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12767#discussion_r61536588
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -616,6 +622,7 @@ def test_save_load(self):
tvsModel.save(tvsModelPath)
loadedModel =
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12770#issuecomment-215632358
**[Test build #2931 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2931/consoleFull)**
for PR 12770 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11812#issuecomment-215632322
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11812#issuecomment-215632323
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#issuecomment-215632276
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#issuecomment-215632274
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11812#issuecomment-215632229
**[Test build #57311 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57311/consoleFull)**
for PR 11812 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#issuecomment-215632186
**[Test build #57306 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57306/consoleFull)**
for PR 12765 at commit
Github user taku-k commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12767#discussion_r61536420
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tuning.py ---
@@ -613,7 +615,9 @@ def copy(self, extra=None):
"""
if extra is None:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215632083
**[Test build #2930 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2930/consoleFull)**
for PR 12755 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12596
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12680#issuecomment-215631757
@GayathriMurali Since the feature freeze deadline is coming and there are
some follow-up tasks blocked by this PR and #12683, do you mind @yanboliang
sending out new
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12426
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12596#issuecomment-215631602
LGTM
Merging with master
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12426#issuecomment-215631563
LGTM2. Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12770#issuecomment-215630612
**[Test build #2931 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2931/consoleFull)**
for PR 12770 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215630110
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215630103
**[Test build #57314 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57314/consoleFull)**
for PR 12764 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215630111
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215630046
**[Test build #57315 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57315/consoleFull)**
for PR 12764 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12770#issuecomment-215629908
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12770#issuecomment-215629910
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12770#issuecomment-215629896
**[Test build #57313 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57313/consoleFull)**
for PR 12770 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215629614
**[Test build #57314 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57314/consoleFull)**
for PR 12764 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12771#issuecomment-215629419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12771#issuecomment-215629417
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12771#issuecomment-215629333
**[Test build #57307 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57307/consoleFull)**
for PR 12771 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12770#issuecomment-215629230
**[Test build #57313 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57313/consoleFull)**
for PR 12770 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12707#issuecomment-215628995
+1 on merging this first and fixing remaining issues later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12426#issuecomment-215628939
This looks pretty good to me. @mengxr @felixcheung any other comments ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-215628799
**[Test build #57312 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57312/consoleFull)**
for PR 12493 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-215628604
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12738#issuecomment-215628414
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215628448
**[Test build #2926 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2926/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12759#issuecomment-215628417
**[Test build #57310 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57310/consoleFull)**
for PR 12759 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12738#issuecomment-215628413
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11812#issuecomment-215628418
**[Test build #57311 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57311/consoleFull)**
for PR 11812 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12738#issuecomment-215628390
**[Test build #57308 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57308/consoleFull)**
for PR 12738 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12759#issuecomment-215628056
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12770#issuecomment-215627923
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12770#issuecomment-215627896
**[Test build #57309 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57309/consoleFull)**
for PR 12770 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12770#issuecomment-215627926
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12774#issuecomment-215627856
(I think "(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot;
otherwise, remove this)" can be removed in the PR description)
---
If your project is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215627564
**[Test build #2928 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2928/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215627327
**[Test build #2927 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2927/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#discussion_r61534645
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -132,7 +132,6 @@ statement
hiveNativeCommands
--- End
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#discussion_r61534626
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -132,7 +132,6 @@ statement
hiveNativeCommands
--- End
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12774#discussion_r61534612
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -376,14 +376,10 @@ class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215627044
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215626991
**[Test build #2929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2929/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215626966
I'm going to merge this. Let's see how the tests pan out.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215626945
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215626944
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215627013
**[Test build #2925 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2925/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215626891
Actually it seems like some files are missing?
For example, ThriftBinaryCLIService.java is not there, but it is in Hive.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215626863
**[Test build #57303 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57303/consoleFull)**
for PR 12769 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#discussion_r61534345
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/UDTRegistration.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215626610
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12770#issuecomment-215626624
**[Test build #57309 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57309/consoleFull)**
for PR 12770 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215626609
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215626453
**[Test build #57300 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57300/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12774#discussion_r61534248
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -376,14 +376,10 @@ class
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215625985
Whenever you change the dependencies you'd need to change the file I think.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12738#issuecomment-215625153
**[Test build #57308 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57308/consoleFull)**
for PR 12738 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12772#issuecomment-215624817
Maybe I think the title is incomplete. It would be nicer if the title
includes where (in.. where).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12774#issuecomment-215624123
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user sbcd90 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12774
[SPARK-14997]Files in subdirectories are incorrectly considered in
sqlContext.read.json()
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the issue of "Files in
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215623845
**[Test build #2930 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2930/consoleFull)**
for PR 12755 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215623807
LGTM pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215622662
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215622661
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215622600
**[Test build #57299 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57299/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215622100
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215622098
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215621978
**[Test build #57301 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57301/consoleFull)**
for PR 12752 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12771#issuecomment-215621546
**[Test build #57307 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57307/consoleFull)**
for PR 12771 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12771#issuecomment-215621056
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#issuecomment-215620953
**[Test build #57306 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57306/consoleFull)**
for PR 12765 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-215620961
Right. Thank you so much for enriching ideas!
I'll update this PR with `FoldablePropagation`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#issuecomment-215620780
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-215620606
the scope of `NullPropagation` is one operator, but we need a
`FoldablePropagation` whose scope is the whole plan tree. Think about `Sort(a,
Filter(true, Project(1
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-215620522
Oh, I got. Thanks. I will try to generalize.
* Sort(_, Project(_))
* Project(_, Project(...))
And so on.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-215620369
If that's just about how to handle `Sort(_, Project(_,_))` expressions in
`EliminateSorts`, I can easily modify this PR according to your advice.
After moving
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12771#discussion_r61532083
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/TPCDSBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,1225 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12753#issuecomment-215619844
Thanks @rxin for checking this, I don't think @ is used any where. Here
again we are replacing only for 'spark.executor.extraJavaOptions' value when
@execid@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-215619600
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-215619599
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-215619544
**[Test build #57296 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57296/consoleFull)**
for PR 12493 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-215619413
Actually, `Sort` is dead end, we can not propagate up anymore.
So, in that case, removing looks more efficient.
Do you mean more generalized
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215619043
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215619044
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215619040
**[Test build #57305 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57305/consoleFull)**
for PR 12764 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215618895
**[Test build #57305 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57305/consoleFull)**
for PR 12764 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-215618718
`select 1 as a from tbl order by a` is equal to `select 1 as a from tbl
order by 1`.
When the child operator is `Project` and has foldable output, if the
1 - 100 of 866 matches
Mail list logo
