Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12974#issuecomment-217609077
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user xwu0226 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12974
[SPARK-14495][SQL] fix resolution failure of having clause with distinct
aggregate function
Symptom:
In the latest **branch 1.6**, when a `DISTINCT` aggregation function is
used in the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217608493
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217608492
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10356#issuecomment-217608460
@JoshRosen Sorry, it was my mistake. It seems it works as expected and not
an issue.
```python
row = Row("f1", "f2")
>>> row(1, 2)
Row(f1=1,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217608468
**[Test build #58055 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58055/consoleFull)**
for PR 12871 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12973
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12973#issuecomment-217608440
Oh I see. The usage was as below and it seems the correct behaviour
```
row = Row("f1", "f2")
>>> row(1, 2)
Row(f1=1, f2=2)
```
Sorry,
Github user lw-lin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12725#issuecomment-217608390
I've addressed comments and expanded tests; @zsxwing would you mind taking
another look? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12775#issuecomment-217608341
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12775#issuecomment-217608339
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12775#issuecomment-217608311
**[Test build #58053 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58053/consoleFull)**
for PR 12775 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12970#issuecomment-217608278
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12970#issuecomment-217608277
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12970#issuecomment-217608247
**[Test build #58052 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58052/consoleFull)**
for PR 12970 at commit
Github user kevinyu98 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12893#issuecomment-217608216
Thank you very much !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12973#issuecomment-217608052
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12973#issuecomment-217608051
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12973#issuecomment-217608050
**[Test build #58058 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58058/consoleFull)**
for PR 12973 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12971#issuecomment-217607981
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12971#issuecomment-217607980
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12971#issuecomment-217607965
**[Test build #58056 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58056/consoleFull)**
for PR 12971 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12973#issuecomment-217607854
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12973#issuecomment-217607853
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12973#issuecomment-217607848
**[Test build #58057 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58057/consoleFull)**
for PR 12973 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12973#issuecomment-217607328
**[Test build #58058 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58058/consoleFull)**
for PR 12973 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12725#issuecomment-217606678
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12725#issuecomment-217606677
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12725#issuecomment-217606648
**[Test build #58054 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58054/consoleFull)**
for PR 12725 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12973#issuecomment-217606617
I submitted this PR because the author is not answering (for about four
months). If the author answers or this PR is problematic, I am happy to close
this.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12973#issuecomment-217606626
**[Test build #58057 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58057/consoleFull)**
for PR 12973 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12973#issuecomment-217606585
I submitted this PR because the author is not answering (for about four
months). If the author answers or this PR is problematic, I am happy to close
this.
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10356#issuecomment-217606556
I submitted a PR for this in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10356
because I guess the author is not answering for about four months.
---
If your project is
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12973
[SPARK-12377][PySpark] Missing argments in implementation for Row.__call__
in PySpark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR corrects the implementation of
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12971#discussion_r62411488
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/JavaDecisionTreeSuite.java ---
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
import java.util.HashMap;
import
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12904#issuecomment-217605838
In case of writing, I think
```
Row("", "null", null)
```
should produce the CSV as below:
1. With the option, `nullValue` set to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12971#issuecomment-217605693
**[Test build #58056 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58056/consoleFull)**
for PR 12971 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12904#issuecomment-217605160
Here is what I think CSV datasource should handle `""`, empty string and
`nullValue`.
With the option, `nullValue` set to `"null"`, I think
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#issuecomment-217605162
LGTM,
Merging this into master and 2.0 branch, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12972#issuecomment-217605135
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12972#issuecomment-217605134
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12972#issuecomment-217605108
**[Test build #58049 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58049/consoleFull)**
for PR 12972 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#issuecomment-217605013
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#issuecomment-217605015
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12904#issuecomment-217604986
@rxin @sureshthalamati Do you mind holding off this change until #12921 is
merged? That PR also handles `nullValue`. Apparently, I guess `nullValue` could
affect
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12904#discussion_r62411095
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVSuite.scala
---
@@ -555,4 +558,37 @@ class CSVSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#issuecomment-217604963
**[Test build #58047 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58047/consoleFull)**
for PR 12954 at commit
Github user sbcd90 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12458#issuecomment-217604922
Hello @zsxwing ,
I have resolved the conflicts. Please have a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217604019
**[Test build #58055 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58055/consoleFull)**
for PR 12871 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12971#issuecomment-217602686
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-217603358
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12921#issuecomment-217603504
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12971#issuecomment-217602678
**[Test build #58048 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58048/consoleFull)**
for PR 12971 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-217603319
**[Test build #58046 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58046/consoleFull)**
for PR 12268 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12921#issuecomment-217603463
**[Test build #58045 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58045/consoleFull)**
for PR 12921 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-217603359
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#discussion_r62410825
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -617,6 +618,77 @@ object NullPropagation extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#discussion_r62410849
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -617,6 +618,77 @@ object NullPropagation extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12921#issuecomment-217603505
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943#issuecomment-217603519
cc @rxin , looks like we missed this one...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12725#issuecomment-217601995
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12966#issuecomment-217602308
**[Test build #58050 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58050/consoleFull)**
for PR 12966 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12725#discussion_r62410545
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/IncrementalExecution.scala
---
@@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12966#issuecomment-217602310
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12966#issuecomment-217602311
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12971#issuecomment-217602687
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12725#issuecomment-217601994
**[Test build #58051 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58051/consoleFull)**
for PR 12725 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12725#issuecomment-217601996
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12775#issuecomment-217602287
**[Test build #58053 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58053/consoleFull)**
for PR 12775 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12725#discussion_r62410548
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ class StreamExecution(
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12725#issuecomment-217602755
**[Test build #58054 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58054/consoleFull)**
for PR 12725 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12970#issuecomment-217602286
**[Test build #58052 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58052/consoleFull)**
for PR 12970 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12893#issuecomment-217602652
thanks, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12893
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11317#issuecomment-217602140
@RussellSpitzer I saw you answered my ping before. Excuse my ping here
again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12953#issuecomment-217602079
thanks, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12953
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12725#issuecomment-217601944
**[Test build #58051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58051/consoleFull)**
for PR 12725 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12949#discussion_r62410521
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -239,8 +239,13 @@ case class DataSource(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12966#issuecomment-217601769
**[Test build #58050 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58050/consoleFull)**
for PR 12966 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12972#issuecomment-217601777
**[Test build #58049 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58049/consoleFull)**
for PR 12972 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612#discussion_r62410489
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/metric/SQLMetrics.scala
---
@@ -19,200 +19,106 @@ package
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12972#issuecomment-217601711
Let me please cc @liancheng and also @tedyu who suggested this change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12972
[SPARK-15198][SQL] Support for pushing down filters for boolean types in
ORC data source
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the support for pushing
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#discussion_r62410420
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -155,7 +155,13 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](
*/
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12971#issuecomment-217601538
**[Test build #58048 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58048/consoleFull)**
for PR 12971 at commit
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12971
[SPARK-14814][MLlib] API: Java compatibility, docs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
fix a java compatibility function in mllib DecisionTreeModel
## How was this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#issuecomment-217600276
**[Test build #58047 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58047/consoleFull)**
for PR 12954 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12113
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12113#issuecomment-21767
Merging this into master and 2.0 branch, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#discussion_r62409983
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/BooleanSimplification.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#discussion_r62409870
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/BooleanSimplification.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-217599175
**[Test build #58046 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58046/consoleFull)**
for PR 12268 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12921#issuecomment-217598946
**[Test build #58045 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58045/consoleFull)**
for PR 12921 at commit
Github user clockfly commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-217598830
@yhuai
This PR truncate the long path by 100 chars
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947/files#diff-4b3d7a5ee80fb01203fcd345c073ae46R186
---
If
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#discussion_r62409566
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/BooleanSimplification.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user ntietz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12955#issuecomment-217598813
I created JIRA SPARK-15197. I think that I covered the expanded scope in
there, but if I goofed and missed something feel free to update.
---
If your project is set up
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12970#issuecomment-217597674
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12970#issuecomment-217597666
**[Test build #58044 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58044/consoleFull)**
for PR 12970 at commit
1 - 100 of 680 matches
Mail list logo
