Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12385#issuecomment-218066012
**[Test build #58211 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58211/consoleFull)**
for PR 12385 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218065383
**[Test build #58210 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58210/consoleFull)**
for PR 12994 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218064524
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218064520
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218064500
**[Test build #58207 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58207/consoleFull)**
for PR 12994 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#discussion_r62614867
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -155,7 +155,13 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](
*/
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13021#issuecomment-218063538
**[Test build #58209 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58209/consoleFull)**
for PR 13021 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13021
[SPARK-15245][SQL] Stream API throws an exception for non-directory path
with incorrect message.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218062949
**[Test build #58207 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58207/consoleFull)**
for PR 12994 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12980#issuecomment-218062958
**[Test build #58208 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58208/consoleFull)**
for PR 12980 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218062741
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12980#issuecomment-218062547
@srowen
I added comments, too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12693#issuecomment-218061787
**[Test build #58206 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58206/consoleFull)**
for PR 12693 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13020#issuecomment-218061515
Is this really an hot fix (serious bug or breaking tests)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13019#issuecomment-218061289
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13019#issuecomment-218061290
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13019#issuecomment-218061186
**[Test build #58202 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58202/consoleFull)**
for PR 13019 at commit
Github user taoli91 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12693#issuecomment-218061073
@andrewor14 I've fixed the failure. Could you please try it again? Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218060958
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218060959
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218060952
**[Test build #58205 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58205/consoleFull)**
for PR 12994 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218060219
**[Test build #58205 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58205/consoleFull)**
for PR 12994 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12980#issuecomment-218056288
**[Test build #58204 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58204/consoleFull)**
for PR 12980 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12980#issuecomment-218056112
Hi, @srowen .
I removes `RAT` and `lint-python` in order to focus **lint-java**.
Also, `lint-scala` is removed since it's already done by `mvn install`.
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13020#discussion_r62610260
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Spillable.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13020#issuecomment-218055325
**[Test build #58203 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58203/consoleFull)**
for PR 13020 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13020#issuecomment-218055343
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13020#discussion_r62610586
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Spillable.scala ---
@@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user sbcd90 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13012
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13012#issuecomment-218055835
@sbcd90 please just close this until you figure out the right fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13012#issuecomment-218055811
That's not the right fix, because the zero value can be non-null, and yet
the result can still be null. The right fix probably requires looking at the
encoder.
---
If
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13020#discussion_r62610536
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Spillable.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user sbcd90 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13012#issuecomment-218054997
Hello @rxin , @koertkuipers ,
I have been following your conversation & feel that the right fix will be
```
override def nullable: Boolean =
GitHub user lianhuiwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13020
[SPARK-4452][Core][HOT-FIX] Fix code style and improve volatile
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Fix code style
2. remove volatile of elementsRead
##
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13012#issuecomment-218054495
Your last sentence was what I was saying. It is not correct to just have
nullable = false.
Please close this pull request as it is not a proper fix.
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13018#issuecomment-218054371
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13018#issuecomment-218054372
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13018#issuecomment-218054292
**[Test build #58200 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58200/consoleFull)**
for PR 13018 at commit
Github user koertkuipers commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13012#issuecomment-218053856
blackbox transformations infer nullable=false when you return a primitive.
for example:
```
scala> sc.parallelize(List(1,2,3)).toDS.map(i => i * 2).schema
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12962
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13018#issuecomment-218053501
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13018#issuecomment-218053502
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12962#issuecomment-218053442
LGTM , merging to master and 2.0, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13018#issuecomment-218053422
**[Test build #58199 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58199/consoleFull)**
for PR 13018 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13019#issuecomment-218052794
**[Test build #58202 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58202/consoleFull)**
for PR 13019 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13019#issuecomment-218052585
cc @yhuai @liancheng @viirya
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13019
[SPARK-15241][SPARK-15242][SQL] fix 2 decimal-related issues in RowEncoder
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-15241: We now support java decimal and catalyst
Github user RussellSpitzer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11317#issuecomment-218052162
I don't think this is because of me
```
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# Internal Error
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218051051
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218051038
**[Test build #58201 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58201/consoleFull)**
for PR 12994 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218051052
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12962#issuecomment-218050940
@andrewor14 @cloud-fan The PR is ready for review. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-218050854
This PR removes `CreateDataSourceTableUtils.validateName`. We move it to
`SessionCatalog`. Let me know if we need to make any change here.
Thanks! @yhuai
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218050017
@tgravescs , I tested locally using Hadoop 2.4 and 2.6 with different
scenarios:
1. Only Hadoop 2.4
2. Hadoop 2.4 upgrade to 2.6 with NM recovery
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-218049881
"HadoopFiles" isn't very useful, and sometimes the files are not even in
Hadoop (e.g. it is just using Hadoop APIs to read S3). Can we say "scan"
instead, and say the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13018#issuecomment-218049576
**[Test build #58200 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58200/consoleFull)**
for PR 13018 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#discussion_r62607434
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2306,8 +2306,37 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
* @group basic
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12994#issuecomment-218049583
**[Test build #58201 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58201/consoleFull)**
for PR 12994 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#discussion_r62607407
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2306,8 +2306,37 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
* @group basic
*
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#discussion_r62607402
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2306,8 +2306,37 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
* @group basic
*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-218049358
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-218049359
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13009#issuecomment-218049250
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-218049248
**[Test build #58195 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58195/consoleFull)**
for PR 12947 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13012#issuecomment-218049147
Is this even correct? Certain aggregators might return nulls.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user adrian-wang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11843
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13018#issuecomment-218049057
**[Test build #58199 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58199/consoleFull)**
for PR 13018 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13018#issuecomment-21804
Benchmark:
val N = 50L << 20
runBenchmark("typed aggregation", N) {
sparkSession.range(N).map(x => (x & 65535,
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13018
[SPARK-15240][SQL] Use buffer variables for update/merge expressions
instead duplicate serialization/deserialization in TungstenAggregate
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-218048161
Yea, let's be consistent on what we allow for table and db names. We have a
utility function `CreateDataSourceTableUtils.validateName`, which does the same
check as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-218047607
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13015
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-218047605
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13011
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-218047473
**[Test build #58194 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58194/consoleFull)**
for PR 12618 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13011#issuecomment-218047419
Merging in master/branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13015#issuecomment-218047335
Merging in master/branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12754#issuecomment-218044958
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12754#issuecomment-218044954
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12754#issuecomment-218044896
**[Test build #58198 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58198/consoleFull)**
for PR 12754 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12980#issuecomment-218044552
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12980#issuecomment-218044554
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12980#issuecomment-21808
**[Test build #58190 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58190/consoleFull)**
for PR 12980 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12754#discussion_r62604571
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/GeneralizedLinearRegressionExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12980#issuecomment-218044302
I found that the previous similar discussion on maven checkstyle overhead
with @zsxwing and @srowen here, https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11438
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12754#issuecomment-218043919
**[Test build #58198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58198/consoleFull)**
for PR 12754 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12754#discussion_r62604290
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/GeneralizedLinearRegressionExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r62603831
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/r/MapPartitionsRWrapper.scala
---
@@ -25,6 +25,21 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.Row
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-218042338
@falaki ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-218042313
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-218042312
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-218042235
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-218042236
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-218042198
**[Test build #58185 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58185/consoleFull)**
for PR 12899 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12974#issuecomment-218042213
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-218042115
**[Test build #58193 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58193/consoleFull)**
for PR 12173 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13017#issuecomment-218041973
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13017#issuecomment-218041971
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13017#issuecomment-218041913
**[Test build #58197 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58197/consoleFull)**
for PR 13017 at commit
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r62603320
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/r/MapPartitionsRWrapper.scala
---
@@ -25,6 +25,21 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.Row
1 - 100 of 740 matches
Mail list logo
