Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13300#discussion_r64694941
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVRelation.scala
---
@@ -142,6 +145,75 @@ object CSVRelation extends
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#discussion_r64694857
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_includeJAR.R ---
@@ -21,10 +21,13 @@ runScript <- function() {
sparkTestJarPath <-
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13300#discussion_r64694834
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -42,16 +42,23 @@ private[csv] object
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-221784338
on a related note, @squito can you in the future leave a msg indicating the
branch a pr was merged once you merge it? There have been cases that lead to
race conditions in
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-221784058
This is pretty cool!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13234#issuecomment-221783307
**[Test build #59344 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59344/consoleFull)**
for PR 13234 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13310#issuecomment-221780558
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13310#issuecomment-221780560
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13310#issuecomment-221780470
**[Test build #59333 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59333/consoleFull)**
for PR 13310 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13290#issuecomment-221777604
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13290#issuecomment-221777607
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13290#issuecomment-221777507
**[Test build #59334 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59334/consoleFull)**
for PR 13290 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13311#issuecomment-221777001
**[Test build #59343 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59343/consoleFull)**
for PR 13311 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13313
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user ueshin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13235#issuecomment-221776141
It looks like #12351 is the same issue about whole stage codegen with
`splitExpressions`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13283#issuecomment-221775767
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13283#issuecomment-221775766
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13283#issuecomment-221775683
**[Test build #59332 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59332/consoleFull)**
for PR 13283 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13308#issuecomment-221775528
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13308#issuecomment-221775529
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13308#issuecomment-221775481
**[Test build #59342 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59342/consoleFull)**
for PR 13308 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221774354
**[Test build #59341 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59341/consoleFull)**
for PR 9192 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221774407
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221774409
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13308#issuecomment-221774053
**[Test build #59342 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59342/consoleFull)**
for PR 13308 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-221773158
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-221773157
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-221773071
**[Test build #59329 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59329/consoleFull)**
for PR 13296 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13308#issuecomment-221773031
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13308#issuecomment-221773032
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13308#issuecomment-221772977
**[Test build #59340 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59340/consoleFull)**
for PR 13308 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221772828
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221772896
Thanks for the update. LGTM. Will merge after Jenkins passes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221772829
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221772778
**[Test build #59339 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59339/consoleFull)**
for PR 13165 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13284
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13284#issuecomment-221772558
Yeah thats a good idea @wangmiao1981 can you open a JIRA to not mask
`startsWith` and `endsWith` by updating our generics ?
LGTM - Merging this to master and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221772591
**[Test build #59341 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59341/consoleFull)**
for PR 9192 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13308#issuecomment-221772521
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13308#issuecomment-221772519
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13308#issuecomment-221772475
**[Test build #59338 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59338/consoleFull)**
for PR 13308 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13284#issuecomment-221772080
looks fine - I think we should really try to make startsWith and endsWith
work though, but that could be a follow up.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13308#issuecomment-221771654
**[Test build #59340 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59340/consoleFull)**
for PR 13308 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13308#issuecomment-221771180
**[Test build #59338 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59338/consoleFull)**
for PR 13308 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221771183
**[Test build #59339 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59339/consoleFull)**
for PR 13165 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13283#issuecomment-221770911
**Update**: The latest code changes contains
- For JDBC format, we added an extra checking in the rule
`ResolveRelations` of `Analyzer`. Without the PR, Spark
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221770814
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221770536
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221770524
**[Test build #59336 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59336/consoleFull)**
for PR 13165 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221770538
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221770384
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221770383
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13290#discussion_r64688437
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1448,6 +1450,37 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221770380
**[Test build #59337 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59337/consoleFull)**
for PR 9192 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221770106
**[Test build #59337 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59337/consoleFull)**
for PR 9192 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13302#discussion_r64688076
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -288,9 +288,10 @@ case class TruncateTableCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221769561
**[Test build #59336 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59336/consoleFull)**
for PR 13165 at commit
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000#issuecomment-221769197
@JoshRosen , could you merge this into branch-1.6?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221769185
I just addressed the comments and here is the
(stdout)[https://gist.github.com/HyukjinKwon/4bf35184f3a30f3bce987a58ec2bbbab]
of testing on Windiws.
---
If your
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13302#discussion_r64687912
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -288,9 +288,10 @@ case class TruncateTableCommand(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221768776
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221768777
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221768774
**[Test build #59335 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59335/consoleFull)**
for PR 9192 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13290#issuecomment-221768479
**[Test build #59334 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59334/consoleFull)**
for PR 13290 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221768460
**[Test build #59335 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59335/consoleFull)**
for PR 9192 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13310#issuecomment-221768478
**[Test build #59333 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59333/consoleFull)**
for PR 13310 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13290#discussion_r64687394
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1448,6 +1450,37 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13315#issuecomment-221768017
@andrewor14
I tried this PR. It does not seem to work/raise error if user attempts
to truncate on partition table with out specifying the partition
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#discussion_r64687334
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -169,48 +169,50 @@ test_that("create DataFrame from RDD", {
error = function(err) {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13283#issuecomment-221767896
**[Test build #59332 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59332/consoleFull)**
for PR 13283 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221767863
@shivaram it's true there's some scaffolding we need to add (though I'm
pretty we could codegen them on the fly instead). I think the idea is this is
temporary and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221767615
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221767617
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221767613
**[Test build #59331 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59331/consoleFull)**
for PR 9192 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221767353
**[Test build #59331 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59331/consoleFull)**
for PR 9192 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#discussion_r64686844
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -362,12 +433,14 @@ sql <- function(sqlContext, sqlQuery) {
#' sc <- sparkR.init()
#' sqlContext <-
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13310#issuecomment-221766492
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13310#issuecomment-221766493
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13310#issuecomment-221766483
**[Test build #59330 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59330/consoleFull)**
for PR 13310 at commit
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221766378
LGTM except some minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#discussion_r64686315
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -254,6 +301,7 @@ jsonFile <- function(sqlContext, path) {
#' df <- jsonRDD(sqlContext, rdd)
#'}
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13290#discussion_r64686215
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1448,6 +1450,37 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#discussion_r64686229
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/jobj.R ---
@@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ print.jobj <- function(x, ...) {
cat("Java ref type", name, "id", x$id, "\n", sep = " ")
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13310#issuecomment-221765755
**[Test build #59330 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59330/consoleFull)**
for PR 13310 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#discussion_r64686152
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -37,6 +37,37 @@ getInternalType <- function(x) {
stop(paste("Unsupported type for SparkDataFrame:",
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13311#issuecomment-221765444
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13311#issuecomment-221765440
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13311#issuecomment-221765335
**[Test build #59327 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59327/consoleFull)**
for PR 13311 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13311#issuecomment-221765416
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13311#issuecomment-221765415
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13311#issuecomment-221765364
**[Test build #59326 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59326/consoleFull)**
for PR 13311 at commit
Github user GayathriMurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13285#issuecomment-221764817
@yanboliang Thanks, thats a good idea. However, that would just include
example code and not how the output of summary() looks like. It might be useful
to
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12394#issuecomment-221764870
cc @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#discussion_r64685560
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -362,12 +433,14 @@ sql <- function(sqlContext, sqlQuery) {
#' sc <- sparkR.init()
#' sqlContext <-
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#discussion_r64685428
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -362,12 +433,14 @@ sql <- function(sqlContext, sqlQuery) {
#' sc <- sparkR.init()
#' sqlContext <-
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13305#issuecomment-221762895
Thank you Andrew , Herman for your input. I am closing this pull request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user sureshthalamati closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13305
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-221761576
**[Test build #59329 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59329/consoleFull)**
for PR 13296 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176#issuecomment-221761348
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 685 matches
Mail list logo
