Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13347#issuecomment-222066786
Can you close this? The current one is too far away from working.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#issuecomment-222065914
ok that makes sense
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#issuecomment-222065198
I created the jira because of
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13337
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13329#discussion_r64859729
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnScheduler.scala ---
@@ -31,9 +31,8 @@ private[spark] class YarnScheduler(sc: SparkContext)
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13317
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13337#issuecomment-222064734
Merging in master/2.0. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13337#issuecomment-222064704
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13338#discussion_r64859655
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -519,9 +519,9 @@ object YarnSparkHadoopUtil {
conf:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#discussion_r64859611
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ object SQLConf {
val WAREHOUSE_PATH =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13337#issuecomment-222064703
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13337#issuecomment-222064577
**[Test build #59458 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59458/consoleFull)**
for PR 13337 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13317#issuecomment-222064507
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13346
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13338#discussion_r64859456
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2262,21 +2262,39 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13346#issuecomment-222064218
LGTM merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#issuecomment-222064155
Should we do this? This means that when there is a HDFS setup, the
warehouse directory will go to local?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13345#discussion_r64859326
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -376,6 +376,38 @@ class SparkSession private(
Dataset.ofRows(self,
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13347#issuecomment-222063487
This is a pretty major refactoring of the internals I think.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#issuecomment-222063441
**[Test build #3024 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3024/consoleFull)**
for PR 13286 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#discussion_r64858995
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ object SQLConf {
val WAREHOUSE_PATH =
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#discussion_r64858912
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -665,7 +666,8 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13335#discussion_r64858840
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -484,6 +484,15 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-222062718
**[Test build #59463 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59463/consoleFull)**
for PR 13296 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-222062573
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#discussion_r64858638
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ object SQLConf {
val WAREHOUSE_PATH =
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13332#issuecomment-222062216
**[Test build #59462 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59462/consoleFull)**
for PR 13332 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#discussion_r64858511
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -665,7 +666,8 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable
Github user sitalkedia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13332#issuecomment-222061833
fixed the tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13343#discussion_r64858434
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -871,6 +879,58 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#issuecomment-222061758
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#issuecomment-222061692
**[Test build #59461 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59461/consoleFull)**
for PR 13348 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#issuecomment-222061759
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#discussion_r64858379
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -665,7 +666,8 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#issuecomment-222061678
**[Test build #59456 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59456/consoleFull)**
for PR 13328 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#issuecomment-222061075
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#issuecomment-222061078
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#discussion_r64858019
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ object SQLConf {
val WAREHOUSE_PATH =
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#issuecomment-222060988
**[Test build #59454 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59454/consoleFull)**
for PR 13328 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13295#issuecomment-222060705
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13295#issuecomment-222060691
**[Test build #59459 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59459/consoleFull)**
for PR 13295 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13295#issuecomment-222060704
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#issuecomment-222060602
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#issuecomment-222060603
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#issuecomment-222060458
**[Test build #59455 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59455/consoleFull)**
for PR 13348 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13349#issuecomment-222060271
**[Test build #59460 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59460/consoleFull)**
for PR 13349 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#discussion_r64857643
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ object SQLConf {
val WAREHOUSE_PATH =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13349#issuecomment-222059987
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13349#issuecomment-222059986
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13349#issuecomment-222059922
**[Test build #59457 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59457/consoleFull)**
for PR 13349 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13349#issuecomment-222059440
Thank YOU for pinging me, @andrewor14 .
For me, it's the most difficult to find the real issue. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13295#issuecomment-222059404
**[Test build #59459 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59459/consoleFull)**
for PR 13295 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13295#issuecomment-222059356
Jenkins, ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13295#issuecomment-222059352
Jenkins, add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-222059297
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-222059299
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-222059197
**[Test build #59453 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59453/consoleFull)**
for PR 13296 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13340
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13340#issuecomment-222058921
LGTM. Merging into master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13343#discussion_r64856240
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -871,6 +879,58 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13343#discussion_r64855963
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -871,6 +879,58 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13321#discussion_r64855946
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExistingRDD.scala ---
@@ -336,9 +336,11 @@ private[sql] object DataSourceScanExec {
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13349#issuecomment-222056689
thanks for working on this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13349#issuecomment-222056682
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#issuecomment-222056227
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#issuecomment-222056226
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13088#issuecomment-222056125
**[Test build #59448 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59448/consoleFull)**
for PR 13088 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13337#issuecomment-222056113
**[Test build #59458 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59458/consoleFull)**
for PR 13337 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7025
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-222054395
Merging this to master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13349#issuecomment-222054344
Hi, @andrewor14 .
This is the PR for SPARK-15583.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12972#issuecomment-222054261
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13349#issuecomment-222054201
**[Test build #59457 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59457/consoleFull)**
for PR 13349 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12972#issuecomment-222054259
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13349
[SPARK-15584][SQL] Abstract duplicate code: `spark.sql.sources.` properties
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR replaces `spark.sql.sources.` strings with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12972#issuecomment-222054156
**[Test build #59452 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59452/consoleFull)**
for PR 12972 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13345#issuecomment-222053231
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13345#issuecomment-222053229
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#issuecomment-222053228
**[Test build #59456 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59456/consoleFull)**
for PR 13328 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13345#issuecomment-222053137
**[Test build #59450 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59450/consoleFull)**
for PR 13345 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#issuecomment-222052867
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#discussion_r64853158
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ object SQLConf {
val WAREHOUSE_PATH =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#issuecomment-222051937
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#issuecomment-222051939
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#issuecomment-222051836
**[Test build #59447 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59447/consoleFull)**
for PR 13328 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13344#discussion_r64852300
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -223,6 +223,13 @@ class SparkSession private(
}
/**
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13341
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348#issuecomment-222049923
**[Test build #59455 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59455/consoleFull)**
for PR 13348 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13348
[SPARK-15565] [SQL] Add the File Scheme to the Default Value of
WAREHOUSE_PATH
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The default value of `spark.sql.warehouse.dir` is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12506#issuecomment-222049425
@andrewor14 did you review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#issuecomment-222049422
**[Test build #59454 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59454/consoleFull)**
for PR 13328 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13347#issuecomment-222048810
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13347#issuecomment-222048813
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13347#issuecomment-222048797
**[Test build #59451 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59451/consoleFull)**
for PR 13347 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12972#issuecomment-222047758
**[Test build #59452 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59452/consoleFull)**
for PR 12972 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-222048304
**[Test build #59453 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59453/consoleFull)**
for PR 13296 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#discussion_r64851180
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleanerSuite.scala ---
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.internal.Logging
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13341#issuecomment-222047947
**[Test build #59443 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59443/consoleFull)**
for PR 13341 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13341#issuecomment-222048073
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
1 - 100 of 897 matches
Mail list logo
