Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-91941
**[Test build #59553 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59553/consoleFull)**
for PR 13147 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373#issuecomment-91692
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373#issuecomment-91690
**[Test build #59552 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59552/consoleFull)**
for PR 13373 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373#issuecomment-91691
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373#issuecomment-91655
**[Test build #59552 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59552/consoleFull)**
for PR 13373 at commit
GitHub user lianhuiwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373
[SPARK-15616] [SQL] Metastore relation should fallback to HDFS size of
partitions that are involved in Query if statistics are not available.
## What changes were proposed in this pull
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13372#issuecomment-91172
**[Test build #59551 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59551/consoleFull)**
for PR 13372 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13372#issuecomment-91079
@rxin Could you check this to satisfy your suggestion? If no problem, I'll
also set default values in json options in a similar way.
---
If your project is set up for
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13372
[SPARK-15585][SQL] Fix NULL handling along with a spark-csv behaivour
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fixes the behaviour of `format("csv").option("quote", null)`
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371#issuecomment-91012
**[Test build #59550 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59550/consoleFull)**
for PR 13371 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371#issuecomment-90971
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371#issuecomment-90965
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371#issuecomment-90964
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371#issuecomment-90957
**[Test build #59549 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59549/consoleFull)**
for PR 13371 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371#issuecomment-90740
**[Test build #59549 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59549/consoleFull)**
for PR 13371 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
[SPARK-15639][SQL] Try to push down filter at RowGroups level for parquet
reader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we use vecterized parquet reader, although the
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370#discussion_r64984155
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/views.scala ---
@@ -41,15 +41,13 @@ import
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370#discussion_r64983965
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/views.scala ---
@@ -41,15 +41,13 @@ import
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370#discussion_r64983961
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.TableIdentifier
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370#discussion_r64983958
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ package
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370#discussion_r64983960
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveDDLCommandSuite.scala ---
@@ -37,9 +35,9 @@ class HiveDDLCommandSuite extends PlanTest {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370#discussion_r64983952
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ case class CatalogStorageFormat(
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370
[SPARK-15638][SQL] Audit Dataset, SparkSession, and SQLContext
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch contains a list of changes as a result of my auditing Dataset,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13370#issuecomment-89732
**[Test build #59548 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59548/consoleFull)**
for PR 13370 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13327
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13327#issuecomment-89291
Given the comments are pretty minor, I'm going to merge this first. I have
some minor cleanups and I will include @andrewor14's comment there.
---
If your project is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13364
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13364#issuecomment-89156
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13320#issuecomment-89137
I'm going to mark this for 2.1 given we are too close to 2.0 to modify
behaviors like this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13364#issuecomment-86984
**[Test build #3029 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3029/consoleFull)**
for PR 13364 at commit
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r64983139
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/deserialize.R ---
@@ -197,6 +197,31 @@ readMultipleObjects <- function(inputCon) {
data # this is a list of named lists now
}
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r64983076
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/r/RRunner.scala ---
@@ -149,12 +150,23 @@ private[spark] class RRunner[U](
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13321#issuecomment-86829
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13321#issuecomment-86830
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13321#issuecomment-86784
**[Test build #59546 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59546/consoleFull)**
for PR 13321 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#issuecomment-86598
@rxin @marmbrus Are you okay with current OutputMode design? Add unit test
for Java compatibility of OutputMode.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13356
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13356#issuecomment-86536
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13367#issuecomment-86496
**[Test build #3030 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3030/consoleFull)**
for PR 13367 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13356#issuecomment-86425
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13356#issuecomment-86427
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13356#issuecomment-86408
**[Test build #59547 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59547/consoleFull)**
for PR 13356 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-85954
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-85952
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-85934
**[Test build #59545 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59545/consoleFull)**
for PR 13147 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#discussion_r64982752
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/QueryPlanner.scala
---
@@ -47,17 +55,27 @@ abstract class
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13368#discussion_r64982756
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -290,11 +290,6 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13363#issuecomment-85365
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13363#issuecomment-85364
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13363#issuecomment-85311
**[Test build #59540 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59540/consoleFull)**
for PR 13363 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#issuecomment-85060
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#issuecomment-85061
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#issuecomment-85015
**[Test build #59542 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59542/consoleFull)**
for PR 13286 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13356#issuecomment-84825
**[Test build #59547 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59547/consoleFull)**
for PR 13356 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13328#issuecomment-84410
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13301
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13301#issuecomment-84311
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13356#discussion_r64982204
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/PCA.scala ---
@@ -40,8 +40,9 @@ class PCA @Since("1.4.0") (@Since("1.4.0") val k: Int) {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13369#issuecomment-83694
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13369#issuecomment-83693
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13369#issuecomment-83670
**[Test build #59544 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59544/consoleFull)**
for PR 13369 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13321#issuecomment-83407
**[Test build #59546 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59546/consoleFull)**
for PR 13321 at commit
Github user watermen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13321#issuecomment-83360
@andrewor14 @cloud-fan Thanks for your advice, please review the code again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-83201
**[Test build #59545 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59545/consoleFull)**
for PR 13147 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13367#issuecomment-83076
**[Test build #3030 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3030/consoleFull)**
for PR 13367 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13368#discussion_r64981737
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -290,11 +290,6 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#discussion_r64981719
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/QueryPlanner.scala
---
@@ -47,17 +55,27 @@ abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13369#issuecomment-82937
**[Test build #59544 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59544/consoleFull)**
for PR 13369 at commit
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13369
[SPARK-15637][SPARKR] fix R tests on R 3.2.2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change version check in R tests
## How was this patch tested?
R
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13367#issuecomment-82812
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13367#issuecomment-82814
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13367#issuecomment-82804
**[Test build #59543 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59543/consoleFull)**
for PR 13367 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13364#issuecomment-82488
**[Test build #3029 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3029/consoleFull)**
for PR 13364 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13367#issuecomment-82424
**[Test build #59543 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59543/consoleFull)**
for PR 13367 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13368#issuecomment-82415
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13367#issuecomment-82403
@cloud-fan updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13368#issuecomment-82416
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13368#issuecomment-82364
**[Test build #59537 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59537/consoleFull)**
for PR 13368 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13363#issuecomment-82263
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13363#issuecomment-82264
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13363#issuecomment-82203
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13363#issuecomment-82206
**[Test build #59536 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59536/consoleFull)**
for PR 13363 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13363#issuecomment-82204
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13367#discussion_r64981440
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -126,7 +137,9 @@ private[sql] case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13363#issuecomment-82158
**[Test build #59538 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59538/consoleFull)**
for PR 13363 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13363#issuecomment-81472
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13363#issuecomment-81471
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13363#issuecomment-81415
**[Test build #59535 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59535/consoleFull)**
for PR 13363 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#issuecomment-81071
**[Test build #59542 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59542/consoleFull)**
for PR 13286 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13356#issuecomment-80836
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13356#issuecomment-80837
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#issuecomment-80807
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13356#issuecomment-80801
**[Test build #59539 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59539/consoleFull)**
for PR 13356 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#issuecomment-80806
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#issuecomment-80804
**[Test build #59541 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59541/consoleFull)**
for PR 13286 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#issuecomment-80740
**[Test build #59541 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59541/consoleFull)**
for PR 13286 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13363#issuecomment-79676
**[Test build #59540 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59540/consoleFull)**
for PR 13363 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13343
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#discussion_r64980368
--- Diff: sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/OutputMode.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
1 - 100 of 724 matches
Mail list logo
