Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222343982
**[Test build #59581 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59581/consoleFull)**
for PR 13386 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13376#issuecomment-222343980
**[Test build #59582 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59582/consoleFull)**
for PR 13376 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222343969
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13389#issuecomment-222343981
**[Test build #59580 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59580/consoleFull)**
for PR 13389 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222343970
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222343951
**[Test build #59578 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59578/consoleFull)**
for PR 13380 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-222343174
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-222343175
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-222343142
**[Test build #59577 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59577/consoleFull)**
for PR 13070 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222343075
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13389
[SPARK-9876][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Enable string and binary tests for Parquet
predicate pushdown
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It seems Parquet has been upgraded to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222343017
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222343015
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222342993
**[Test build #59576 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59576/consoleFull)**
for PR 13147 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222342716
**[Test build #59579 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59579/consoleFull)**
for PR 13386 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222342720
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222342719
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-222342640
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-222342638
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-222342620
**[Test build #59575 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59575/consoleFull)**
for PR 13070 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222342588
**[Test build #59579 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59579/consoleFull)**
for PR 13386 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13381#issuecomment-222342274
The Java & Python version don't appear to currently exist in master - did
you mean to include them in this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13388#issuecomment-222342223
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user mawise opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13388
fix example code issues in documentation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed broken java code examples in streaming documentation
Attn: @tdas
You can merge
Github user mawise commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13387#issuecomment-222342012
Let me re-do this without the merge commit
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mawise closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13387
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13387#issuecomment-222341862
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user mawise opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13387
[Docs] Fix streaming java doc examples
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed code examples in docs
Attn @tdas (your name is all over the git-blame for these docs)
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13375#issuecomment-222341706
Thanks for the review @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13375#discussion_r64997369
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -251,11 +251,12 @@ frequently and don't carry as much meaning.
`StopWordsRemover` takes as input a sequence of
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222341365
**[Test build #59578 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59578/consoleFull)**
for PR 13380 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-222341220
**[Test build #59577 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59577/consoleFull)**
for PR 13070 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222341221
**[Test build #59576 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59576/consoleFull)**
for PR 13147 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-222340717
**[Test build #59575 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59575/consoleFull)**
for PR 13070 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13381#issuecomment-222340650
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13381#issuecomment-222340649
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13381#issuecomment-222340640
**[Test build #59574 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59574/consoleFull)**
for PR 13381 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13381#issuecomment-222340465
**[Test build #59574 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59574/consoleFull)**
for PR 13381 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#discussion_r64997106
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite extends
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#discussion_r64997103
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#discussion_r64997097
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#discussion_r64996988
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite extends
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#discussion_r64996971
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#discussion_r64996960
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222339354
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222339353
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222339329
**[Test build #59573 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59573/consoleFull)**
for PR 13147 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-222338133
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-222338132
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-222338094
**[Test build #59571 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59571/consoleFull)**
for PR 12618 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222337714
@dongjoon-hyun Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222337348
Hi, @gatorsmile .
Personally, I love this PR. :)
I just hesitated to change the function signatures of MLLIB in #13352 .
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13376#issuecomment-222337289
**[Test build #59572 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59572/consoleFull)**
for PR 13376 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13376#issuecomment-222337302
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13376#issuecomment-222337301
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222337216
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222337215
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222337188
**[Test build #59570 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59570/consoleFull)**
for PR 13386 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13385#issuecomment-222337168
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13385#issuecomment-222337169
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13385#issuecomment-222337149
**[Test build #59569 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59569/consoleFull)**
for PR 13385 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222337092
**[Test build #59573 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59573/consoleFull)**
for PR 13147 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13376#issuecomment-222336356
**[Test build #59572 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59572/consoleFull)**
for PR 13376 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-222335855
**[Test build #59571 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59571/consoleFull)**
for PR 12618 at commit
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r64996012
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1695,16 +1695,176 @@ object
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222335661
@dongjoon-hyun @andrewor14 This PR removes `SQLContext` from `MLlib`. Let
me know if we should keep it. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r64995985
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1695,16 +1695,176 @@ object
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13352#issuecomment-222335566
Sorry, I did not notice this PR. I submitted another PR
(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380) that removes `SQLContext` from
`MLlib`. Any reason why you
Github user dhruve commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061#issuecomment-222335144
@jodersky you can get the context if you follow the conversation as to why
its placed in target/extra-resources.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222334903
**[Test build #59570 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59570/consoleFull)**
for PR 13386 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222334796
@ericl @andrewor14 @liancheng Can you review this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386
[SPARK-14507] [SPARK-15646] [SQL] When spark.sql.hive.convertCTAS is true,
we should not convert the table stored as TEXTFILE/SEQUENCEFILE and we need
respect the user-defined location
## What
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13385#issuecomment-222334358
**[Test build #59569 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59569/consoleFull)**
for PR 13385 at commit
GitHub user keypointt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13385
[SPARK-15645][Streaming] Fix some typos of Streaming module
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
No code change, just some typo fixing.
## How was this patch
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13384#issuecomment-222333936
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13384#issuecomment-222333937
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13384#issuecomment-222333909
**[Test build #59567 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59567/consoleFull)**
for PR 13384 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13383#issuecomment-222333782
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13383#issuecomment-222333780
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13383#issuecomment-222333732
**[Test build #59566 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59566/consoleFull)**
for PR 13383 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13122#issuecomment-222333667
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13122#issuecomment-222333666
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13122#issuecomment-222333630
**[Test build #59568 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59568/consoleFull)**
for PR 13122 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13375#discussion_r64994783
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -251,11 +251,12 @@ frequently and don't carry as much meaning.
`StopWordsRemover` takes as input a sequence of
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13122#issuecomment-222330991
**[Test build #59568 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59568/consoleFull)**
for PR 13122 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13122#issuecomment-222330922
@hvanhovell @yhuai This is also ready to review. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13111#issuecomment-222330637
cc @yhuai The code is ready for review. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13384#issuecomment-222330298
**[Test build #59567 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59567/consoleFull)**
for PR 13384 at commit
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13384
[CORE][MINOR][DOC] Removing incorrect scaladoc
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I don't think the method will ever throw an exception so removing a false
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13383#issuecomment-222330114
**[Test build #59566 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59566/consoleFull)**
for PR 13383 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13367
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13383
[CORE][DOC][MINOR] typos + links
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A very tiny change to javadoc (which I don't mind if gets merged with a
bigger change). I've
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13367#issuecomment-222329931
lgtm. Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13111#issuecomment-222329693
**[Test build #59565 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59565/consoleFull)**
for PR 13111 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13111#issuecomment-222329713
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13111#issuecomment-222329712
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13111#issuecomment-222329144
**[Test build #59565 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59565/consoleFull)**
for PR 13111 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#issuecomment-222328340
@rxin `SQLContext` is not being used in the `MLlib` test suites. Thus, this
PR is just to use the latest `SparkSession` to replace the existing
`SQLContext` in
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r64993001
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/worker/worker.R ---
@@ -84,67 +84,78 @@ broadcastElap <- elapsedSecs()
# as number of partitions to create.
numPartitions <-
Github user jurriaan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13374#discussion_r64992937
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVParser.scala
---
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ private[sql] class
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
