Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13221#issuecomment-222415753
Thanks a lot @marmbrus for your reply.
My concern is that ContinuousQuery still transforms the logical plan in the
runtime according to the Sources, so it is
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13335#discussion_r65024979
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/CompositeOffset.scala
---
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ package
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13335#issuecomment-222415048
I reverted
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c24b6b679c3efa053f7de19be73eb36dc70d9930
as there is a Option serialization bug in jackson-module-scala 2.7.3
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13335#discussion_r65024904
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/util/ContinuousQueryListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -183,35 +179,23 @@ class ContinuousQueryListenerSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13335#issuecomment-222414970
**[Test build #59608 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59608/consoleFull)**
for PR 13335 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222412709
**[Test build #59607 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59607/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13219#issuecomment-222412544
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13219#issuecomment-222412506
**[Test build #59605 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59605/consoleFull)**
for PR 13219 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13219#issuecomment-222412543
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222412185
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222412184
**[Test build #59606 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59606/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222412187
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222411932
**[Test build #59606 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59606/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222409876
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222409877
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222409808
**[Test build #59604 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59604/consoleFull)**
for PR 13147 at commit
Github user GayathriMurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176#issuecomment-222409058
@MLnick Please let me know if there is anything else that I can help with
this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13219#issuecomment-222408967
**[Test build #59605 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59605/consoleFull)**
for PR 13219 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371#issuecomment-222408752
also cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371#issuecomment-222408282
cc @nongli @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rajeshbalamohan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12105#issuecomment-222408035
Sorry about the delay in responding to this. Will try to rebase and post
the patch asap.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user ueshin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222403715
@marmbrus Could you review this pr again and let me know if I have
something to do to merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-222403702
**[Test build #59604 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59604/consoleFull)**
for PR 13147 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13392#discussion_r65019806
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -937,7 +937,8 @@ object SimplifyConditionals
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222403231
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222403233
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222403154
**[Test build #59603 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59603/consoleFull)**
for PR 13351 at commit
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000#issuecomment-222398286
ping @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222394724
**[Test build #59603 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59603/consoleFull)**
for PR 13351 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#discussion_r65015447
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2345,17 +2345,19 @@ private[spark] class RedirectThread(
*/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222394155
**[Test build #59602 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59602/consoleFull)**
for PR 13351 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222394159
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222394158
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#issuecomment-222394058
**[Test build #59602 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59602/consoleFull)**
for PR 13351 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13351#discussion_r65015360
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2345,17 +2345,19 @@ private[spark] class RedirectThread(
*/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13385#issuecomment-222390801
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13385#issuecomment-222390798
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user catapan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13396#discussion_r65014383
--- Diff: core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/historypage.js
---
@@ -54,7 +54,8 @@ function makeIdNumeric(id) {
}
function
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13385#issuecomment-222390746
**[Test build #59601 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59601/consoleFull)**
for PR 13385 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13396#discussion_r65014109
--- Diff: core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/historypage.js
---
@@ -54,7 +54,8 @@ function makeIdNumeric(id) {
}
function
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13396#issuecomment-222389159
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13396#issuecomment-222389158
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13396#issuecomment-222389122
**[Test build #59599 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59599/consoleFull)**
for PR 13396 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13395#discussion_r65013574
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -936,7 +936,47 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf) extends
Github user catapan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13396#issuecomment-222388056
revised as suggested. Thanks for the suggestions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13395#discussion_r65013372
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -936,7 +936,47 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13395#discussion_r65013342
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -936,7 +936,47 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user tejasapatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13396#issuecomment-222387582
nit: the title of the PR could be made better:
`[SPARK-15641] HistoryServer to not show invalid date for incomplete
application`
---
If your project is
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13396#discussion_r65013295
--- Diff: core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/historypage.js
---
@@ -54,7 +54,8 @@ function makeIdNumeric(id) {
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#issuecomment-222386802
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#issuecomment-222386805
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#issuecomment-222386772
**[Test build #59600 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59600/consoleFull)**
for PR 13394 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13385#issuecomment-222386241
**[Test build #59601 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59601/consoleFull)**
for PR 13385 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#issuecomment-222386047
**[Test build #59600 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59600/consoleFull)**
for PR 13394 at commit
Github user vectorijk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#issuecomment-222385824
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13377
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13377#issuecomment-222384857
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222384540
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222384541
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222384486
**[Test build #59598 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59598/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13396#issuecomment-222384278
**[Test build #59599 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59599/consoleFull)**
for PR 13396 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13388#issuecomment-222384252
OK. Convention is to add `[MINOR]` to the title BTW. LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13385#discussion_r65011967
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/receiver/Receiver.scala ---
@@ -242,8 +242,7 @@ abstract class Receiver[T](val storageLevel:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13385#discussion_r65011957
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ParallelCollectionRDD.scala ---
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
private[spark]
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13396#issuecomment-222384154
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13396#discussion_r65011946
--- Diff: core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/historypage.js
---
@@ -54,7 +54,8 @@ function makeIdNumeric(id) {
}
function
Github user mawise commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13388#issuecomment-222383817
Nothing jumps out at me as I scan though the docs for similar errors.
There might be some left- I'm not doing a super thorough review.
On Sun, May 29, 2016
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13375#issuecomment-222383405
I think that's fine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390#discussion_r65011713
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/MulticlassClassificationEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ class
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390#discussion_r65011674
--- Diff: docs/mllib-evaluation-metrics.md ---
@@ -182,17 +183,22 @@ $$\hat{\delta}(x) = \begin{cases}1 & \text{if $x =
0$}, \\ 0 & \text{otherwise}.
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390#discussion_r65011652
--- Diff: docs/mllib-evaluation-metrics.md ---
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ for all other classes. So, a true positive occurs
whenever the prediction and th
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390#discussion_r65011630
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/MulticlassClassificationEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ class
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390#discussion_r65011625
--- Diff: docs/mllib-evaluation-metrics.md ---
@@ -182,17 +183,22 @@ $$\hat{\delta}(x) = \begin{cases}1 & \text{if $x =
0$}, \\ 0 & \text{otherwise}.
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390#discussion_r65011611
--- Diff: docs/mllib-evaluation-metrics.md ---
@@ -182,17 +183,22 @@ $$\hat{\delta}(x) = \begin{cases}1 & \text{if $x =
0$}, \\ 0 & \text{otherwise}.
Github user jodersky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061#issuecomment-222380888
What I understand from the conversation is that maven assumes the
target/extra-resources directory:
> Unfortunately I'm not an maven expert but I wonder if we can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13395#issuecomment-222380672
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13395#issuecomment-222380673
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13395#issuecomment-222380607
**[Test build #59596 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59596/consoleFull)**
for PR 13395 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222379303
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222379304
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222379286
**[Test build #59598 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59598/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13386#issuecomment-222379256
**[Test build #59594 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59594/consoleFull)**
for PR 13386 at commit
Github user NarineK commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222379022
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222378750
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222378755
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222378756
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222378743
**[Test build #59597 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59597/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222378749
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222378722
**[Test build #59593 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59593/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user vectorijk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#issuecomment-222378580
Jenkins test this again please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-222378255
**[Test build #59597 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59597/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13396#issuecomment-222376647
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user catapan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13396
SPARK-15641 do not show for incomplete application
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/catapan/spark
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13395#issuecomment-222376429
**[Test build #59596 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59596/consoleFull)**
for PR 13395 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13395#issuecomment-222376388
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13395#issuecomment-222376022
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13395#issuecomment-222376014
**[Test build #59595 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59595/consoleFull)**
for PR 13395 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13395#issuecomment-222376021
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13395#issuecomment-222375644
**[Test build #59595 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59595/consoleFull)**
for PR 13395 at commit
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13395
[SPARK-14507] [SQL] EXTERNAL keyword in a CTAS statement is not allowed
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR makes the parser to throw an exception if a hive style CTAS
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
