Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60002/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
**[Test build #60002 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60002/consoleFull)**
for PR 13514 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65811458
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/package.scala
---
@@ -86,11 +86,31 @@ package object expressions {
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13508
@felixcheung As we discussed, I opened a JIRA on exporting the is.nan. Can
you review it? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13476
@felixcheung Any more comments? The version check is needed otherwise it
can't pass unit tests. All other review comments are done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/6/
Test FAILed.
---
If
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
**[Test build #6 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/6/consoleFull)**
for PR 13513 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60001/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
**[Test build #60001 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60001/consoleFull)**
for PR 13514 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
**[Test build #60002 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60002/consoleFull)**
for PR 13514 at commit
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59998/
Test FAILed.
---
If
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #59998 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59998/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
**[Test build #60001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60001/consoleFull)**
for PR 13514 at commit
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
[SPARK-15770][ML] 'Experimental' annotation audit
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, remove comments `:: Experimental ::` for non-experimental API
2, add comments
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59994/
Test FAILed.
---
If
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
**[Test build #59994 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59994/consoleFull)**
for PR 13505 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
**[Test build #6 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/6/consoleFull)**
for PR 13513 at commit
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
[SPARK-15698][SQL][Streaming] Add the ability to remove the old MetadataLog
in FileStreamSource
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Current `metadataLog` in
Github user koertkuipers commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13512
**[Test build #5 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5/consoleFull)**
for PR 13512 at commit
Github user koertkuipers commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13512
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user koertkuipers commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13512
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user koertkuipers commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13512
**[Test build #5 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5/consoleFull)**
for PR 13512 at commit
GitHub user koertkuipers opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13512
[SPARK-15769][SQL] Add Encoder for input type to Aggregator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Aggregator also has an Encoder for the input type
## How was this
Github user xiaowangyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9113
@rxin
Thanks! I get it.
BTW,any component will take the place of the thrift server?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user drcrallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10232
@drcrallen Did https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4027 covered the memory
constraints you were adding as part of this issue? I can't find another open or
closed issue that addresses the issue
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #59998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59998/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
**[Test build #59997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59997/consoleFull)**
for PR 13511 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59997/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59996/
Test FAILed.
---
If
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #59996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59996/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
@srowen It is just the local test code, please ignore it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
Looks correct, what are you pointing out?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
**[Test build #59997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59997/consoleFull)**
for PR 13511 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
cc @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
```
>>> from pyspark.mllib.evaluation import *
>>> predictionAndLabels = sc.parallelize([(0.0, 0.0), (0.0, 1.0), (0.0,
0.0), (1.0, 0.0), (1.0, 1.0), (1.0, 1.0), (1.0, 1.0), (2.0, 2.0),
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
[SPARK-14900][ML][PySpark] Add accuracy and deprecate precison,recall,f1
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, add accuracy for MulticlassMetrics
2, deprecate overall
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
**[Test build #3065 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3065/consoleFull)**
for PR 13491 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59995/
Test PASSed.
---
If
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
**[Test build #59995 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59995/consoleFull)**
for PR 13491 at commit
Github user xiaowangyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9113
@xiaowangyu the thrift server has gone through a lot of changes lately, and
we are not sure whether we'd want to keep the existing thrift server at all
because it has a huge amount of technical
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #59996 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59996/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13439
Sorry I don't understand what this is trying to accomplish from your pr
description. Are you trying to save space for the partition column?
This adds the number of concrete implementations
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59993/
Test FAILed.
---
If
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #59993 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59993/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user MechCoder commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13503
cc @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
lgtm - I didn't look too closely though. Would be great @ericl to look at
this in detail.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
**[Test build #3066 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3066/consoleFull)**
for PR 13505 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
**[Test build #3065 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3065/consoleFull)**
for PR 13491 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
**[Test build #59995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59995/consoleFull)**
for PR 13491 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
**[Test build #59994 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59994/consoleFull)**
for PR 13505 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
Alright, updated to address comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65809321
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/AttributeMap.scala
---
@@ -26,13 +26,6 @@ object AttributeMap {
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #59993 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59993/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65808923
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/package.scala
---
@@ -86,11 +86,31 @@ package object expressions {
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
@rxin, I think that it might make sense to use AttributeSeq more widely.
Right now there's an implicit conversion so we can gradually and naively
migrate APIs to accept AttributeSeq.
---
If
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65808887
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/package.scala
---
@@ -86,11 +86,31 @@ package object expressions {
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65808880
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/package.scala
---
@@ -86,11 +86,31 @@ package object expressions {
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65808854
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/package.scala
---
@@ -86,11 +86,31 @@ package object expressions {
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #59992 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59992/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59992/
Test FAILed.
---
If
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #59992 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59992/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59991/
Test FAILed.
---
If
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #59991 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59991/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #59991 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59991/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13448
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13448
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user javabrett commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13462
@javabrett have a look at my comment on the JIRA, what do you think? this
might be more fix-able.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r65807864
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/worker/worker.R ---
@@ -27,6 +27,58 @@ elapsedSecs <- function() {
proc.time()[3]
}
+computeHelper <-
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504#discussion_r65807744
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/Metadata.scala ---
@@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ sealed class Metadata private[types]
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
Merging to master and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504#discussion_r65807740
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/Metadata.scala ---
@@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ sealed class Metadata private[types]
Github user srowen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13510
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13510
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13510
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13510
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59990/
Test PASSed.
---
If
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13510
**[Test build #59990 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59990/consoleFull)**
for PR 13510 at commit
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13506#discussion_r65805306
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1441,6 +1441,32 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging with
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13510
**[Test build #59990 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59990/consoleFull)**
for PR 13510 at commit
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13482
cc @vanzin @tgravescs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13472#discussion_r65804521
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Benchmark.scala ---
@@ -33,18 +38,37 @@ import org.apache.commons.lang3.SystemUtils
*
* The
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13472#discussion_r65804523
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Benchmark.scala ---
@@ -33,18 +38,37 @@ import org.apache.commons.lang3.SystemUtils
*
* The
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65804344
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/package.scala
---
@@ -86,11 +86,31 @@ package object expressions {
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65804276
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/package.scala
---
@@ -86,11 +86,31 @@ package object expressions {
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13326
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59989/
Test FAILed.
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13326
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13326
**[Test build #59989 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59989/consoleFull)**
for PR 13326 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13483
@viirya You know, as I said above, both ways are not perfect. My inputs are
just based on my previous design experiences. All the design decisions I made
are based on usage scenarios.
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
