Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
@yhuai Your step 3 may not work. We are going to filter the row groups for
each parquet file to read in `VectorizedParquetRecordReader`. I think we don't
do anything regarding creating splits?
---
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r66564793
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1695,16 +1695,176 @@ object
Github user wangyang1992 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585#discussion_r66564745
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/QueryPartitionSuite.scala ---
@@ -65,4 +69,95 @@ class QueryPartitionSuite extends
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413#discussion_r66564698
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -1481,17 +1481,7 @@ def test_list_functions(self):
spark.sql("CREATE DATABASE some_db")
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13436
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13415
**[Test build #60275 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60275/consoleFull)**
for PR 13415 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13436
LGTM - merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13415
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
@yhuai Parquet also does this filtering at ParquetRecordReader
Github user wangyang1992 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585#discussion_r66563744
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -92,6 +92,36 @@ object PhysicalOperation extends
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13576#discussion_r66563599
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -327,6 +334,8 @@ def csv(self, path, schema=None, sep=None,
encoding=None, quote=None, escape=Non
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13569
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13576#discussion_r66563370
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -207,9 +207,10 @@ def json(self, path, schema=None,
primitivesAsString=None, prefersDecimal=None,
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496
try to ping @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413#discussion_r66563299
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -58,15 +60,39 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13569
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13569#discussion_r66563276
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SubquerySuite.scala
---
@@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ class SubquerySuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLContext
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413#discussion_r66563267
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -855,7 +855,8 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413#discussion_r66563161
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -1481,17 +1481,7 @@ def test_list_functions(self):
spark.sql("CREATE DATABASE some_db")
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342
**[Test build #60274 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60274/consoleFull)**
for PR 13342 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66562319
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -232,7 +234,7 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df: DataFrame)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #60273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60273/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r66561815
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1695,16 +1695,176 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13589
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13589
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60268/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13589
**[Test build #60268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60268/consoleFull)**
for PR 13589 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60269/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #60269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60269/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13569#discussion_r66561018
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SubquerySuite.scala
---
@@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ class SubquerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r66561017
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1695,16 +1695,176 @@ object
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r66560947
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1695,16 +1695,176 @@ object
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r66560868
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1695,16 +1695,176 @@ object
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
@viirya I took a look at parquet's code. Seems parquet only evaluate row
group level filters when generating splits
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13591
**[Test build #60272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60272/consoleFull)**
for PR 13591 at commit
GitHub user techaddict opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13591
[Minor] Replace all occurrences of None: Option[X] with Option.empty[X]
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace all occurrences of None: Option[X] with Option.empty[X]
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13569
**[Test build #3073 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3073/consoleFull)**
for PR 13569 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13586
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13586
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60267/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13586
**[Test build #60267 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60267/consoleFull)**
for PR 13586 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13572
**[Test build #60271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60271/consoleFull)**
for PR 13572 at commit
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13541
It's weird that I can pass the python test in local, but fails on github
jenkins. And the error message not clear to me. @davies Could you help take a
look at it ? Thanks. Here's the output from
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13323
Thanks @devaraj-kavali, this LGTM. @andrewor14 can you take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13541
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13541
**[Test build #60270 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60270/consoleFull)**
for PR 13541 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13541
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60270/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66558301
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -232,7 +234,7 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df: DataFrame)
{
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r66558119
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1695,16 +1695,176 @@ object
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r66558125
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1695,16 +1695,176 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13541
**[Test build #60270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60270/consoleFull)**
for PR 13541 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13576
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60265/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13576
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13576
**[Test build #60265 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60265/consoleFull)**
for PR 13576 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13590
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user mhmoudr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13590
SPARK-15858: Fix calculating error by tree stack over flow problem anâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improving evaluateEachIteration function in mllib as it fails
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13572
Yeah, in Spark 1.6, we also silently drop the temporary table if the names
are the same. Let me remove the related changes and update the title and JIRA
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #60269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60269/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13588
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13589
**[Test build #60268 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60268/consoleFull)**
for PR 13589 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13576
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13576
**[Test build #60264 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60264/consoleFull)**
for PR 13576 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13576
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60264/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13589
[SPARK-15822][SPARK-15825][SQL] Fix SMJ Segfault/Invalid results
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I'll add desc later
## How was this patch tested?
TBD
GitHub user mhmoudr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13588
SPARK-15858: Fix calculating error by tree stack over flow problem anâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improving evaluateEachIteration function in mllib as it fails
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13587
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user mortada opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13587
[Documentation] fixed groupby aggregation example for pyspark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
fixing documentation for the groupby/agg example in python
## How
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13576
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60259/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13576
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13586
**[Test build #60267 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60267/consoleFull)**
for PR 13586 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13576
**[Test build #60259 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60259/consoleFull)**
for PR 13576 at commit
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13586
[SPARK-15860] Metrics for codegen size and perf
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds codahale metrics for the codegen source text size and how long it
takes to compile.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60263/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
**[Test build #60263 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60263/consoleFull)**
for PR 13585 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60260/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342
**[Test build #60260 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60260/consoleFull)**
for PR 13342 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13558
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13558
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60266/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13558
**[Test build #60266 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60266/consoleFull)**
for PR 13558 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13569
**[Test build #3073 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3073/consoleFull)**
for PR 13569 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342
LGTM, except a few minor nits.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13580
LGTM -- seems like the lower risk option here, especially for 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66552040
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ForeachWriter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13582
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13577
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13582
LGTM - merging to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13558
**[Test build #60266 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60266/consoleFull)**
for PR 13558 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66551851
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ForeachWriter.scala
---
@@ -68,9 +71,9 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.ContinuousQuery
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13558
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60256/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
**[Test build #60256 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60256/consoleFull)**
for PR 13371 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13584
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60261/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13584
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13584
**[Test build #60261 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60261/consoleFull)**
for PR 13584 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13583
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60254/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342
**[Test build #60254 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60254/consoleFull)**
for PR 13342 at commit
1 - 100 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
