Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13553
**[Test build #60356 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60356/consoleFull)**
for PR 13553 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13553
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13604
**[Test build #60355 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60355/consoleFull)**
for PR 13604 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60354/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
**[Test build #60354 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60354/consoleFull)**
for PR 13617 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60353/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619
**[Test build #60353 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60353/consoleFull)**
for PR 13619 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12601#discussion_r66716164
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -96,7 +97,16 @@ private[sql] case class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12601#discussion_r66716162
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -19,37 +19,105 @@ package
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12601#discussion_r66716158
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -19,37 +19,105 @@ package
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12601#discussion_r66716161
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -19,37 +19,105 @@ package
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13614
I think it will be nicer if it follows
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599#discussion_r66716081
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonWorkerFactory.scala ---
@@ -29,7 +30,10 @@ import org.apache.spark._
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
**[Test build #60354 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60354/consoleFull)**
for PR 13617 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619
**[Test build #60353 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60353/consoleFull)**
for PR 13619 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619
@jkbradley Sure!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user koertkuipers commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8416
this patch should not have broken reading files that include comma.
i also added unit test for this:
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13381#discussion_r66715565
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -685,6 +685,76 @@ The implementation matches the result from R's
survival function
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13381
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60352/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13381
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13381
**[Test build #60352 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60352/consoleFull)**
for PR 13381 at commit
Github user avulanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13621
@mengxr @jkbradley could you take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13381
**[Test build #60352 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60352/consoleFull)**
for PR 13381 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13381
Other than that, this looks ready.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13381#discussion_r66714994
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -685,6 +685,76 @@ The implementation matches the result from R's
survival function
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13621
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60351/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13621
**[Test build #60351 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60351/consoleFull)**
for PR 13621 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13621
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13586
Fixed
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016, 7:07 PM UCB AMPLab wrote:
> Test PASSed.
>
>
> Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13586
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60349/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13586
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13586
**[Test build #60349 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60349/consoleFull)**
for PR 13586 at commit
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585#discussion_r66714698
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -92,6 +92,36 @@ object PhysicalOperation extends
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13545
Thank you for merging, @rxin !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13621
**[Test build #60351 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60351/consoleFull)**
for PR 13621 at commit
Github user watermen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13524
@davies @rxin Can you review the code for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user watermen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13561
@davies @rxin Can you review the code for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user yangw1234 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585#discussion_r66714468
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -92,6 +92,36 @@ object PhysicalOperation extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13621
**[Test build #60350 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60350/consoleFull)**
for PR 13621 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13621
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60350/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13621
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13621
**[Test build #60350 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60350/consoleFull)**
for PR 13621 at commit
GitHub user avulanov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13621
[SPARK-2623] [ML] Implement stacked autoencoder
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implement stacked autoencoder
- Base on ml.ann Layer and LossFunction
- Implement
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585#discussion_r66714358
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveStrategies.scala ---
@@ -65,15 +65,20 @@ private[hive] trait HiveStrategies {
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585#discussion_r66714324
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -92,6 +92,36 @@ object PhysicalOperation extends
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585#discussion_r66714314
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/QueryPartitionSuite.scala ---
@@ -65,4 +69,95 @@ class QueryPartitionSuite extends
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
Thank you all for the review, but I am not going to solve the CNF, the
intention of this PR is to exact more partition pruning expression, so we will
get have less partition to scan during
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585#discussion_r66714297
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -92,6 +92,36 @@ object PhysicalOperation extends
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
We can do it in a separate pr -- it'd be great to move all Python and R
methods over to a single class. Otherwise it has two major problems:
1. Those methods are public for Java.
2.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13602
**[Test build #3080 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3080/consoleFull)**
for PR 13602 at commit
Github user asfer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12983
Apart from the merge conflict, everything looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13338#discussion_r66714041
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2262,21 +2262,39 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60348/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #60348 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60348/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
@rxin I think in this case we need access to grouping expression and
DataFrame from within the RelationalGroupedDataset class. One solution could be
to move the function `flatMapGroupsInR` to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13586
**[Test build #60349 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60349/consoleFull)**
for PR 13586 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r66713462
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/RelationalGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -381,6 +385,50 @@ class RelationalGroupedDataset
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13482#discussion_r66713200
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -462,10 +464,23 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13482
@andrewor14, I think we should consider two problems here: the fact that
the thread will sleep for less than the min interval if something triggers it
and whatever is currently triggering it. We
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13482#discussion_r66713080
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -462,10 +464,23 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13602
**[Test build #3080 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3080/consoleFull)**
for PR 13602 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8416
@marmbrus mind sharing how to do it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8416
@rxin I believe I fixed that limitation in my recent refactoring.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161
FYI I accidentally merged this in branch-2.0 too, but I reverted it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13586
Looks like this failed some tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13545
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13545
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13595
@tdas this matches what we discussed right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8416
Is there still a way to specify a file that includes comma after this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13605
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13604
Can you update the pr and link to this ticket?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15898
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13607
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13605
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13607
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13607#discussion_r66712617
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ object TestSettings {
javaOptions in Test += "-Dspark.ui.enabled=false",
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13607#discussion_r66712619
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ object TestSettings {
javaOptions in Test += "-Dspark.ui.enabled=false",
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13607#discussion_r66712579
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ object TestSettings {
javaOptions in Test += "-Dspark.ui.enabled=false",
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #60348 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60348/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13616
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13616
Merging in master/2.0. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13552
The line is too long @peterableda but otherwise looks fine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Thanks @liancheng and @rxin !
With respect to your point, @rxin - "private[sql] signature in public
APIs ."
dapply added that signature to `Dataset.scala `and gapply adds it to
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r66712035
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/RelationalGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -381,6 +385,50 @@ class RelationalGroupedDataset
Github user sjjpo2002 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13615
I'm closing this. I'm not sure how this caused build errors. I just
referred to the typo in the documentation and didn't make any changes!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user sjjpo2002 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13615
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60347/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
**[Test build #60347 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60347/consoleFull)**
for PR 13617 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
**[Test build #60347 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60347/consoleFull)**
for PR 13617 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
jenkins add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13611
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60346/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13611
**[Test build #60346 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60346/consoleFull)**
for PR 13611 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13611
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13611
**[Test build #60346 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60346/consoleFull)**
for PR 13611 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13611#discussion_r66710277
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SharedState.scala ---
@@ -40,10 +42,16 @@ private[sql] class SharedState(val sparkContext:
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo