Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
Hi, @vanzin .
Could you review this when you have some time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
[SPARK-15913][CORE] Dispatcher.stopped should be enclosed by synchronized
block.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Dispatcher.stopped` is guarded by `this`, but
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13623
In this file PartitioningAwareFileCatalog.scala, we have multiple places
that we filter out files that start with underscore. Should we also filter dot
in those places?
---
If your project is set
Github user yangw1234 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585#discussion_r66742485
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -92,6 +92,36 @@ object PhysicalOperation extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13633
**[Test build #60382 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60382/consoleFull)**
for PR 13633 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13633
[SPARK-15912] [SQL] Replace getPartitionsByFilter by getPartitions in
inputFiles of MetastoreRelation
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Always returns the files of all
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13631
@cloud-fan There is a test ("Detect table partitioning with correct
partition order") in `InsertIntoHiveTableSuite` which is dedicated to test
`insertInto` with this column re-ordering. What you
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585#discussion_r66741771
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveStrategies.scala ---
@@ -65,15 +65,20 @@ private[hive] trait HiveStrategies {
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#discussion_r66741569
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -218,9 +222,9 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"GeneralizedLinearRegressionModel"),
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#discussion_r66741577
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -582,9 +586,9 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#discussion_r66741575
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -357,9 +361,9 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
cluster = cluster,
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#discussion_r66741568
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -197,7 +201,7 @@ print.summary.GeneralizedLinearRegressionModel <-
function(x, ...) {
invisible(x)
}
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#discussion_r66741560
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/column.R ---
@@ -170,6 +172,8 @@ setMethod("between", signature(x = "Column"),
}
})
+#' cast
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394#discussion_r66741566
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -249,10 +249,7 @@ col <- function(x) {
#'
#' Returns a Column based on the given column name.
#'
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60379/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413
**[Test build #60379 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60379/consoleFull)**
for PR 13413 at commit
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585#discussion_r66741254
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveStrategies.scala ---
@@ -65,15 +65,20 @@ private[hive] trait HiveStrategies {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13631
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13631
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60380/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13631
**[Test build #60380 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60380/consoleFull)**
for PR 13631 at commit
Github user clockfly commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13623
Looks good! +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13604
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13604
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13629
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13629
Thanks - merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13632
**[Test build #60381 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60381/consoleFull)**
for PR 13632 at commit
GitHub user clockfly opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13632
[SPARK-15910][SQL] Check schema consistency when using Kryo encoder to
convert DataFrame to Dataset
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enforces schema check when
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13631
**[Test build #60380 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60380/consoleFull)**
for PR 13631 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13631
[SPARK-15911][SQL] Remove the additional Project to be consistent with SQL
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently In `DataFrameWriter`'s `insertInto` and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60376/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
**[Test build #60376 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60376/consoleFull)**
for PR 13585 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413
**[Test build #60379 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60379/consoleFull)**
for PR 13413 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706
@kamalcoursera you could use a predicate scalar subquery here, i.e.:
```sql
select runon as runon
case
when (select max(true) from sqltesttable b where b.key =
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13630
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13630
It seems this should be reverted first. Closing this (see
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619
Yes, it seems it is still failing. I can change the PR to revert this if he
is busy for now. Otherwise, I will close mine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619
@HyukjinKwon OK, but this pr should be reverted first.
@jkbradley could you revert this pr for branch-1.6 ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13558
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60378/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13558
**[Test build #60378 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60378/consoleFull)**
for PR 13558 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13558
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13630
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13630
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60377/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13630
**[Test build #60377 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60377/consoleFull)**
for PR 13630 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13558
**[Test build #60378 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60378/consoleFull)**
for PR 13558 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13558
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619
@zzcclp I made a PR against branch-1.6 here,
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13630. Thank you for pointing this out
quickly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13630
**[Test build #60377 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60377/consoleFull)**
for PR 13630 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13630
cc @jkbradley and @zzcclp
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13630
[SPARK-15892][ML] Change spark to sqlContext in the test in
AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite for 1.6
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user kamalcoursera commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706
Thank you ! Any alternative options to use instead of predicate subquery ?
Is it in plan for amendment in 2.0?
Select
runon as runon,
case
when key in (Select key
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585#discussion_r66733226
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveStrategies.scala ---
@@ -65,15 +65,20 @@ private[hive] trait HiveStrategies {
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
Updated with more meaningful function name and add more unit test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
cc @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r66733080
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/r/RRunner.scala ---
@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ private[spark] class RRunner[U](
broadcastVars:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619#discussion_r66732958
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -390,6 +390,18 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
**[Test build #60376 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60376/consoleFull)**
for PR 13585 at commit
Github user zzcclp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619#discussion_r66732911
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -390,6 +390,18 @@ class AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite
Github user zzcclp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619#discussion_r66732825
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -390,6 +390,18 @@ class AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13629
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13629
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60375/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6983#discussion_r66732804
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtilsSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,4 +49,41 @@ class DateTimeUtilsSuite extends
Github user zzcclp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13619#discussion_r66732808
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -390,6 +390,18 @@ class AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13629
**[Test build #60375 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60375/consoleFull)**
for PR 13629 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
So this is a WIP of what this could look like, but I'd really like your
thoughts on the draft @davies - do you think this is heading in the right
direction given the performance #s from the
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#discussion_r66732763
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/group.R ---
@@ -142,3 +142,58 @@ createMethods <- function() {
}
createMethods()
+
+#' gapply
+#'
+#'
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13604
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60374/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13604
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13604
**[Test build #60374 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60374/consoleFull)**
for PR 13604 at commit
Github user ssimeonov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13623
ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13628
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60373/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13628
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13628
**[Test build #60373 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60373/consoleFull)**
for PR 13628 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496#discussion_r66731642
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -452,6 +452,17 @@ class Analyzer(
def
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13542#discussion_r66731077
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/CliSuite.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ class CliSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13629
**[Test build #60375 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60375/consoleFull)**
for PR 13629 at commit
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13629
[SPARK-15370][SQL] Fix count bug
# What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request fixes the COUNT bug in the
`RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery` rule.
After this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12313
If this is too large for merging to 2.0, could @rdblue deliver a small fix
for capturing the illegal user inputs? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13628
There is a better fix in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12313. Let me
close it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13628
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496#discussion_r66730126
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -452,6 +452,17 @@ class Analyzer(
def
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13626
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13626
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60372/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13626
**[Test build #60372 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60372/consoleFull)**
for PR 13626 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13604
**[Test build #60374 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60374/consoleFull)**
for PR 13604 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13628
**[Test build #60373 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60373/consoleFull)**
for PR 13628 at commit
Github user shafiquejamal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13614
Ok, I'll close this an open a new PR with the title done correctly. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13628
[SPARK-15907] [SQL] Issue Exceptions when Not Enough Input Columns for
Dynamic Partitioning
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```SQL
CREATE TABLE
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13596
thanks, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13596
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496#discussion_r66729871
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -452,6 +452,17 @@ class Analyzer(
def
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413#discussion_r66729858
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -89,6 +89,10 @@ class SimpleFunctionRegistry
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496#discussion_r66729833
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -452,6 +452,17 @@ class Analyzer(
def
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13627
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user tilumi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13627
[SPARK-15906][MLlib][WIP] Add complementary naive bayes algorithm
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `ComplementaryNaiveBayes.scala` in package
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496#discussion_r66729456
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -452,6 +452,17 @@ class Analyzer(
def
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496#discussion_r66729419
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -452,6 +452,17 @@ class Analyzer(
def
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496#discussion_r66729375
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -452,6 +452,17 @@ class Analyzer(
def
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13570
@hvanhovell @jkbradley Could you add @ioana-delaney to the whitelist?
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
1 - 100 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
