Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13541
Merging this into master and 2.0, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13541
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13734
Hi, @shivaram and @felixcheung .
Now the document is updated with master and shows merged notes correctly. I
manually checked all the merged notes and used function signatures for
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13592
@liancheng Is it worth adding two parameters
`spark.sql.files.maxPartitionBytes` and `spark.sql.files.openCostInBytes` in
`Other Configuration Options`? They are kinds of internal parameters
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13752
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60763/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13752
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13752
**[Test build #60763 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60763/consoleFull)**
for PR 13752 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13753
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60762/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13753
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13753
**[Test build #60762 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60762/consoleFull)**
for PR 13753 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13734
**[Test build #60765 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60765/consoleFull)**
for PR 13734 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13750
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13750
Merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641#discussion_r67596152
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/ElementwiseProduct.scala ---
@@ -33,21 +33,26 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.DataType
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641#discussion_r67596150
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/ElementwiseProduct.scala ---
@@ -33,21 +33,26 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.DataType
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13755
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13755
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60761/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13755
**[Test build #60761 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60761/consoleFull)**
for PR 13755 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13753
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13753
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60757/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13753
**[Test build #60757 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60757/consoleFull)**
for PR 13753 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13751
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60756/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13751
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13751
**[Test build #60756 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60756/consoleFull)**
for PR 13751 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13752
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60755/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13752
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13752
**[Test build #60755 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60755/consoleFull)**
for PR 13752 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13745
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60758/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13745
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
**[Test build #60764 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60764/consoleFull)**
for PR 13756 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13745
**[Test build #60758 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60758/consoleFull)**
for PR 13745 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
[SPARK-16041][SQL] Disallow Duplicate Columns in partitionBy, blockBy and
sortBy in DataFrameWriter
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Duplicate columns are not allowed
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13745
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13745
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60752/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13745
**[Test build #60752 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60752/consoleFull)**
for PR 13745 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13752
**[Test build #60763 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60763/consoleFull)**
for PR 13752 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13753
**[Test build #60762 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60762/consoleFull)**
for PR 13753 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13755
**[Test build #60761 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60761/consoleFull)**
for PR 13755 at commit
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13755
[SPARK-16040][MLlib][DOC]:spark.mllib PIC document extra line of refernece
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the 2.0 document, Line "A full example that
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13753
LGTM pending Jenkins. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13635
Oh, great!!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13718
@tdas I fixed the test. Could you take another look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13746
**[Test build #60760 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60760/consoleFull)**
for PR 13746 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13754
**[Test build #60759 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60759/consoleFull)**
for PR 13754 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13740
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13754
[SPARK-16036][SPARK-16037][SQL] fix various table insertion semantics
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current table insertion has some weird behaviours:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13754
cc @yhuai @marmbrus @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13740
The added test passed. I'm going to merge it into master and 2.0 to make
sure it's in rc1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13745
**[Test build #60758 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60758/consoleFull)**
for PR 13745 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13753
**[Test build #60757 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60757/consoleFull)**
for PR 13753 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13752
**[Test build #60755 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60755/consoleFull)**
for PR 13752 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13751
**[Test build #60756 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60756/consoleFull)**
for PR 13751 at commit
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13753
[SPARK-16029][SPARKR] SparkR add dropTempView and deprecate dropTempTable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add dropTempView and deprecate dropTempTable
##
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13752
example update in the other PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13752
[SPARK-16028][SPARKR] spark.lapply can work with active context
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
spark.lapply and setLogLevel
## How was this patch
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13751
[SPARK-15159][SPARKR] SparkSession roxygen2 doc, programming guide, example
updates
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
roxygen2 doc, programming guide, example
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13725
I am closing this as this is merged. Thank you @mengxr again!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13725
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13750
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60749/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13749
**[Test build #60754 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60754/consoleFull)**
for PR 13749 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13750
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13750
**[Test build #60749 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60749/consoleFull)**
for PR 13750 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13635
awesome!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13635
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13749
**[Test build #60753 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60753/consoleFull)**
for PR 13749 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13635
LGTM. Merging this to master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13731
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13745
**[Test build #60752 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60752/consoleFull)**
for PR 13745 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13745#discussion_r67595234
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -46,14 +46,16 @@ In MLlib, we separate TF and IDF to make them flexible.
`HashingTF` is a `Transformer` which takes
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13731
LGTM, merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13745
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13749
**[Test build #60750 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60750/consoleFull)**
for PR 13749 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13749
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60750/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13749
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13750
LGTM. It is bad that we don't have full coverage here. Given the fact that
`parse` is more like an internal feature paired with `str`, it is probably okay
to manual test this.
---
If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13749
**[Test build #60750 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60750/consoleFull)**
for PR 13749 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268
**[Test build #60751 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60751/consoleFull)**
for PR 12268 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13750
**[Test build #60749 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60749/consoleFull)**
for PR 13750 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13750
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13285
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13285
Merged into master and branch-2.0. Saw some very minor issues. I make
another pass and fix them in a follow-up PR. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13725
LGTM. Merged into branch-1.6. Thanks for backporting the patch!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13734
Thank you for opinions! I'll revise and update the html doc.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721
Thank you for merging, @shivaram .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12675
**[Test build #60748 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60748/consoleFull)**
for PR 12675 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12675
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60748/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12675
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60747/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727
**[Test build #60747 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60747/consoleFull)**
for PR 13727 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13635
Test passed and merge cleanly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12675
**[Test build #60748 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60748/consoleFull)**
for PR 12675 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13748
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13748
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60746/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13748
**[Test build #60746 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60746/consoleFull)**
for PR 13748 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13747
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13747
LGTM. Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13635#discussion_r67594224
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -615,11 +619,12 @@ clearCache <- function() {
#' @method dropTempTable default
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13734
hopefully we don't have a lot of these...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13748
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60740/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 544 matches
Mail list logo
