Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13800
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13799
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13800
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60907/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13800
**[Test build #60907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60907/consoleFull)**
for PR 13800 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109#discussion_r67811795
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -134,9 +129,7 @@ setMethod("freqItems", signature(x = "SparkDataFrame",
cols = "character"),
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798#discussion_r67811733
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -689,67 +689,67 @@ setGeneric("randomSplit", function(x, weights, seed)
{ standardGeneric("randomSp
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13799
LGTM. Thanks! Merging to master and branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109#discussion_r67811551
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -134,9 +129,7 @@ setMethod("freqItems", signature(x = "SparkDataFrame",
cols = "character"),
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60906/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13720#discussion_r67811389
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ case class CatalogTable(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
**[Test build #60906 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60906/consoleFull)**
for PR 13798 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13720#discussion_r67811340
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -180,7 +180,8 @@ case class CatalogTable(
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13295
@mhnatiuk Given that #13786 was merged, can you close this PR ? Only the PR
authors have permission to close a PR in the Spark project
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13791
OK. PS it's not javadoc, but, that's not important
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60905/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
**[Test build #60908 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60908/consoleFull)**
for PR 13109 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
**[Test build #60905 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60905/consoleFull)**
for PR 13109 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109#discussion_r67810438
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -430,19 +430,19 @@ setGeneric("coltypes<-", function(x, value) {
standardGeneric("coltypes<-") })
#' @export
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13738#discussion_r67810196
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -421,6 +421,13 @@ object SparkHadoopUtil {
val
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798#discussion_r67810125
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -689,67 +689,67 @@ setGeneric("randomSplit", function(x, weights, seed)
{ standardGeneric("randomSp
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
Yes. Indeed, we had better keep each function on own RD generally.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13800#discussion_r67809875
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -268,10 +270,12 @@ def json(self, path, schema=None,
primitivesAsString=None, prefersDecimal=None,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13800
**[Test build #60907 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60907/consoleFull)**
for PR 13800 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13800
cc @felixcheung
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13800
[SPARK-13792][SQL] Addendum: Fix Python API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13795 to
properly set CSV options in
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109#discussion_r67809806
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -430,19 +430,19 @@ setGeneric("coltypes<-", function(x, value) {
standardGeneric("coltypes<-") })
#' @export
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13799
Thanks LGTM. Will wait for @liancheng to also take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13795#discussion_r67809544
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -392,6 +392,10 @@ def csv(self, path, schema=None, sep=None,
encoding=None, quote=None, escape=Non
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
That's intentional - covar_pop has a separate page.
cov == covar_samp
putting covar_pop on the same rd would have 2 different descriptions here.
(I think we really should avoid putting
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
Yeah lets do that in a separate PR with discussion ? We don't lose much by
leaving in a few extra functions that we deprecate / remove later.
Thanks for the doc cleanup - I'll take one
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
No more jobGroup changes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13772
@viirya Can you comment in the jira with your case?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
**[Test build #60906 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60906/consoleFull)**
for PR 13798 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13795#discussion_r67809152
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -392,6 +392,10 @@ def csv(self, path, schema=None, sep=None,
encoding=None, quote=None, escape=Non
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13795#discussion_r67808964
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -392,6 +392,10 @@ def csv(self, path, schema=None, sep=None,
encoding=None, quote=None, escape=Non
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
In line 333 of `functions.R`, `@rdname covar_pop` -> `@rdname cov`?
```
#' covar_pop
#'
#' Compute the population covariance between two expressions.
#'
#' @rdname
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
Right they are really SparkContext methods - I could leave/deprecate them
if you'd prefer, or separate that into a different PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13799
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60904/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13799
**[Test build #60904 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60904/consoleFull)**
for PR 13799 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
It's nasty! ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13799
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
Oh, the root cause exists in `generics.R`. Nice catch!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
**[Test build #60905 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60905/consoleFull)**
for PR 13109 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13759
@rxin Sure!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109#discussion_r67808208
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
setOldClass("jobj")
-#' crosstab
+#' @title SparkDataFrame statistic functions
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13759
Can you submit a pr for 1.6? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13744
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13759
Thank you @rxin! Would this be sensible if this one is backported to 1.6.2?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13759
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13744
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
Hmm can we document somewhere why we want to remove this functionality ? Is
this because spark context is no longer accessible ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13759
LGTM - merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13789
@rxin Thanks, failed to merge it due to network issue...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13789
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60903/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13789
I've merged this in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
**[Test build #60903 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60903/consoleFull)**
for PR 13798 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13773
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
**[Test build #60901 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60901/consoleFull)**
for PR 13796 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60901/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13795
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13773
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13795
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13799
**[Test build #60904 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60904/consoleFull)**
for PR 13799 at commit
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13799
[SPARK-15863][SQL][DOC][SPARKR] sql programming guide updates to include
sparkSession in R
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update doc as per discussion in PR
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13789
Merging to master and branch-2.0 on behalf of @mengxr.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13789
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109#discussion_r67806444
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
setOldClass("jobj")
-#' crosstab
+#' @title SparkDataFrame statistic functions
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13786
Thank you, @shivaram !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109#discussion_r67806331
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
setOldClass("jobj")
-#' crosstab
+#' @title SparkDataFrame statistic functions
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13797
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60902/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13797
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13797
**[Test build #60902 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60902/consoleFull)**
for PR 13797 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109#discussion_r67806157
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
setOldClass("jobj")
-#' crosstab
+#' @title SparkDataFrame statistic functions
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109#discussion_r67805814
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
setOldClass("jobj")
-#' crosstab
+#' @title SparkDataFrame statistic functions
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13786
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
**[Test build #60903 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60903/consoleFull)**
for PR 13798 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
Opened a JIRA since we are removing methods.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
@shivaram @dongjoon-hyun
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13786
LGTM. Merging this to master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
cc @dbtsai @jkbradley @mengxr If you get a chance to review and/or provide
feedback on the approach I'd appreciate it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13793
Merged into 1.5, 1.6, 2.0 and master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user davies closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13793
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13797
**[Test build #60902 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60902/consoleFull)**
for PR 13797 at commit
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13797
Update docs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update docs for two parameters `spark.sql.files.maxPartitionBytes` and
`spark.sql.files.openCostInBytes ` in Other Configuration
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13797
@liancheng ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
**[Test build #60901 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60901/consoleFull)**
for PR 13796 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13786
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60899/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13786
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13786
**[Test build #60899 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60899/consoleFull)**
for PR 13786 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13786
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13786
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60898/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13786
**[Test build #60898 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60898/consoleFull)**
for PR 13786 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13795
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60896/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13795
**[Test build #60896 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60896/consoleFull)**
for PR 13795 at commit
1 - 100 of 713 matches
Mail list logo
