Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68889173
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/XPathExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61446/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930
**[Test build #61446 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61446/consoleFull)**
for PR 13930 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r6729
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/XPathExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13860
**[Test build #61451 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61451/consoleFull)**
for PR 13860 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886
**[Test build #61450 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61450/consoleFull)**
for PR 13886 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13860#discussion_r6152
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -52,6 +52,23 @@ class DataTypeSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13966#discussion_r6095
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -162,6 +162,42 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13860#discussion_r6077
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -52,6 +52,23 @@ class DataTypeSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r6030
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -301,6 +302,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13860#discussion_r6029
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/DataFrameReaderWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -363,6 +363,31 @@ class DataFrameReaderWriterSuite
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r6009
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/XPathExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13860#discussion_r68887957
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -52,6 +52,23 @@ class DataTypeSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13860#discussion_r68887844
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -52,6 +52,23 @@ class DataTypeSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
For 3, I respect your opinion. I just make another commit for 2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68887731
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -301,6 +302,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68887674
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/XPathExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13919
**[Test build #61448 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61448/consoleFull)**
for PR 13919 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
**[Test build #61449 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61449/consoleFull)**
for PR 13906 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13966#discussion_r68887526
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -162,6 +162,42 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13893
It's a good point, looks like we can also improve the `PushDownPredicate`
rule according to this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61443/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912
**[Test build #61443 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61443/consoleFull)**
for PR 13912 at commit
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68887194
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -301,6 +302,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61444/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13860#discussion_r68887161
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/DataFrameReaderWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -363,6 +363,31 @@ class DataFrameReaderWriterSuite
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68887178
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/XPathBoolean.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13912
**[Test build #61444 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61444/consoleFull)**
for PR 13912 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13966
**[Test build #3139 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3139/consoleFull)**
for PR 13966 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13860#discussion_r68886986
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -52,6 +52,23 @@ class DataTypeSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964
**[Test build #3140 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3140/consoleFull)**
for PR 13964 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13966
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13966
cc @dongjoon-hyun @cloud-fan @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user petermaxlee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13966
[SPARK-16276][SQL] Implement elt SQL function
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch implements the elt function, as it is implemented in Hive.
## How was
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13893
Predicates should not be reordered if a condition contains
non-deterministic parts, for example, 'rand() < 0.1 AND a=1' should not be
reordered to 'a=1 AND rand() < 0.1' as the number of calls
Github user gurvindersingh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13950#discussion_r68886506
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -127,7 +128,14 @@ private[deploy] class Master(
Github user gurvindersingh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13950#discussion_r68886448
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -127,7 +128,14 @@ private[deploy] class Master(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68886429
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/NonFoldableLiteral.scala
---
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ import
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13948
Feel free to do it - but please take another careful look before you cherry
pick.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13933
@gatorsmile parquet, json or other file formats support both `path` and
`paths` options. So that's not a problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68886317
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/XPathBoolean.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68886279
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/XPathBoolean.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
By the way, for complexity, it's 23 line optimizer without blank/comments.
In fact, it's less than `NullPropagation`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13948
@rxin why don't we merge this one to 2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13955
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
It sounds promising. Maybe, Spark 2.1?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13955
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
Sounds interesting. You mean `LocalNode` that computes all local node
operators on `LocalRelation`, right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13893
no, the predicates order doesn't matter. Our optimizer can reorder the
predicates to run them more efficient.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704#discussion_r68885567
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -837,8 +837,36 @@ case class Cast(child: Expression,
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
I'm not sure if this optimization is useful
1. empty `LocalRelation` is a corner case and seems not worth to optimize.
2. the optimization rule in this PR is kind of complex.
3. if
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13893
@cloud-fan I pushed a commit to apply predicate pushdown on deterministic
parts placed before any non-deterministic predicates, should it be safe to do
this optimizationï¼
---
If your
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68884892
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -301,6 +302,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13965
**[Test build #61447 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61447/consoleFull)**
for PR 13965 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13965
[SPARK-16236] [SQL] [FOLLOWUP] Add Path Option back to Load API in
DataFrameReader
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When users only specify one and only one path, we
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68884564
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/XmlFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68884371
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/XmlFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68884363
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/NonFoldableLiteral.scala
---
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ import
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68884303
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/XmlFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68884274
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/XmlFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61436/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13961
**[Test build #3137 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3137/consoleFull)**
for PR 13961 at commit
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68884185
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/XPathExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
**[Test build #61436 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61436/consoleFull)**
for PR 11863 at commit
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68884156
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/XPathBoolean.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61441/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68884143
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/NonFoldableLiteral.scala
---
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
**[Test build #61441 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61441/consoleFull)**
for PR 13778 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68884058
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/NonFoldableLiteral.scala
---
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13963
**[Test build #61445 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61445/consoleFull)**
for PR 13963 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13963
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68884017
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/XPathBoolean.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13963
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61445/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68883944
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/XPathBoolean.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68883895
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/NonFoldableLiteral.scala
---
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ import
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
@cloud-fan @vlad17 Is this change good for your now? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964#discussion_r68883797
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/NonFoldableLiteral.scala
---
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930
**[Test build #61446 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61446/consoleFull)**
for PR 13930 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930
Rebased to the master for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13939 .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61435/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
**[Test build #61435 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61435/consoleFull)**
for PR 13778 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964
**[Test build #3138 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3138/consoleFull)**
for PR 13964 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964
cc @srowen @cloud-fan @vanzin @squito
If this one works, I can implement the other ones too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964
cc @srowen @cloud-fan @vanzin @squito
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user petermaxlee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13964
[SPARK-16274][SQL] Implement xpath_boolean
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch implements xpath_boolean expression for Spark SQL, a xpath
function that returns
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13961
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
Thank you, @cloud-fan .
It seems to be a good idea to handle operators on LocalRelations.
But, if possible, may I dig that on another PR? :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13961
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494#discussion_r68882374
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/MetadataOnlyOptimizer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13963
**[Test build #61445 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61445/consoleFull)**
for PR 13963 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13963
[TRIVIAL][PYSPARK] Clean up orc compression option as well
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR corrects ORC compression option for PySpark as well. I think this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13963
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
1 - 100 of 779 matches
Mail list logo
