Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
For now let's just do it for text file. I took a look - I guess it is ok to
leave them in datasources for now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14172
**[Test build #62214 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62214/consoleFull)**
for PR 14172 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14172
@liancheng I thought both were omitted in the original codes because
`BigDecimal` and `Timestamp` are not supported but it seems they are and work
fine. Could you please take a look?
---
If
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14172
[SPARK-16516][SQL] Support for pushing down filters for decimal and
timestamp types in ORC
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It seems ORC supports all the types in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
**[Test build #62213 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62213/consoleFull)**
for PR 14036 at commit
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
@cloud-fan Updated the PR, all tests should pass now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
**[Test build #62212 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62212/consoleFull)**
for PR 14036 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
**[Test build #62207 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62207/consoleFull)**
for PR 14158 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62207/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user adrian-wang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
This is strange because I can pass the specific test on my local.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user uzadude commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14068
Have done the requested nit changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14171
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62211/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14171
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14171
**[Test build #62211 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62211/consoleFull)**
for PR 14171 at commit
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151#discussion_r70564698
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/HadoopFileWholeTextReader.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
Actually what you said sounds like a nice idea, I was considering is it
possible to propogate this as an option in all other formats like CSV and Json
too ?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151#discussion_r70564514
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/HadoopFileWholeTextReader.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r70564289
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -249,11 +241,12 @@ case class Divide(left:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14171
**[Test build #62211 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62211/consoleFull)**
for PR 14171 at commit
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r70563932
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -249,11 +241,12 @@ case class Divide(left:
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14171
[SPARKR][MINOR] R examples and test updates
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Minor example updates
## How was this patch tested?
manual
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14149
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14149
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62204/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62206/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14149
**[Test build #62204 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62204/consoleFull)**
for PR 14149 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
**[Test build #62206 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62206/consoleFull)**
for PR 14170 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111#discussion_r70563183
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -263,7 +263,9 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990#discussion_r70562875
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StringFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -384,4 +384,39 @@ class StringFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r70562757
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -249,11 +241,12 @@ case class Divide(left:
Github user nblintao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
**In the commit above, I made three adjustments:**
1. If the query has no related query text, show a blank in that field.
1. If there is no query in the table has a query text, not
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990#discussion_r70562486
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StringFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -384,4 +384,39 @@ class StringFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990#discussion_r70562420
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ComplexTypeSuite.scala
---
@@ -246,4 +246,26 @@ class ComplexTypeSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990#discussion_r70562365
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -393,3 +394,56 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990#discussion_r70562343
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -393,3 +394,56 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704#discussion_r70562239
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/SimplifyCastsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62205/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
**[Test build #62205 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62205/consoleFull)**
for PR 14169 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
I have a simpler idea to implement this feature:
1. in `SparkPlan`, build a map from distinct subqueries to future result,
and still keep the original subquery list.
2. in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #62210 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62210/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14168
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14168
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62202/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14168
**[Test build #62202 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62202/consoleFull)**
for PR 14168 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62209/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #62209 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62209/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #62209 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62209/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
@cloud-fan all comments addressed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #62208 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62208/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
**[Test build #62207 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62207/consoleFull)**
for PR 14158 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111#discussion_r70560854
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -263,7 +263,9 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
> To be fair if you have a bug in another part of the shuffle service that
is not in the startup path, it still could take out your whole cluster. That
can't be fixed until the NM runs aux
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990#discussion_r70560643
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -393,3 +394,54 @@ case class
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670#discussion_r70560042
--- Diff:
core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/executorspage-template.html
---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+
+
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670#discussion_r70560022
--- Diff:
core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/executorspage.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,410 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990#discussion_r70559727
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -393,3 +394,54 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
**[Test build #62206 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62206/consoleFull)**
for PR 14170 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
**[Test build #62205 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62205/consoleFull)**
for PR 14169 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Hi, @rxin .
Could you review this PR again when you have some time?
All the features are implemented and Spark Parser accepts general hints now.
---
If your project is set up for it,
GitHub user brkyvz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
[MINOR][SQL][TEST] Remove timezone setting from DataFrameTimeWindowingSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's unnecessary. `QueryTest` already sets it.
You can merge
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14149
**[Test build #62204 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62204/consoleFull)**
for PR 14149 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
cc @rxin @hvanhovell @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62203/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
**[Test build #62203 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62203/consoleFull)**
for PR 14169 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
**[Test build #62203 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62203/consoleFull)**
for PR 14169 at commit
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
[SPARK-16515][SQL]set default record reader and writer for script
transformation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `ScriptInputOutputSchema`, we read default
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14168
Sure
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user tilumi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14129
Ok, I'll change the implementation to non-array version and run benchmark
on both versions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
Addressed a comment. Since the following code cannot pass information on
`valueContainsNull = false`, I use the current code.
```
def map(mapType: MapType): AttributeReference =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62198/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34
**[Test build #49 has
finished](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/49/consoleFull)**
for PR 34 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
**[Test build #62198 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62198/consoleFull)**
for PR 14132 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14168
@ericl please open a JIRA ticket for this. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14168
**[Test build #62202 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62202/consoleFull)**
for PR 14168 at commit
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14168
[MINOR] [SQL] Fix various regex codegen bugs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
RegexExtract and RegexReplace currently crash on non-nullable input due use
of a hard-coded
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62199/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34
**[Test build #49 has
started](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/49/consoleFull)**
for PR 34 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14166#discussion_r70554897
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnClusterSuite.scala ---
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ class YarnClusterSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
**[Test build #62199 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62199/consoleFull)**
for PR 14165 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786
@vazin, sorry for the delay.
I think your concern is valid that this change will probably harm the
performance since 15 seconds (preemption waiting) is not a short time.
But
Github user jerryshao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14163#discussion_r70553491
--- Diff: docs/monitoring.md ---
@@ -224,10 +224,12 @@ both running applications, and in the history server.
The endpoints are mounted
for the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13409
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62200/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13409
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13409
**[Test build #62200 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62200/consoleFull)**
for PR 13409 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
**[Test build #62201 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62201/consoleFull)**
for PR 14167 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62201/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
**[Test build #62201 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62201/consoleFull)**
for PR 14167 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62196/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
**[Test build #62196 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62196/consoleFull)**
for PR 14132 at commit
GitHub user mgummelt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
[WIP] [SPARK-16194] Mesos Driver env vars
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added new configuration namespace: spark.mesos.env.*
This allows a user submitting a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62195/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 545 matches
Mail list logo
