Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14335#discussion_r72011858
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -472,12 +473,13 @@ final class OnlineLDAOptimizer extends
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14335#discussion_r72011821
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -472,12 +473,13 @@ final class OnlineLDAOptimizer extends
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14336#discussion_r72011689
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -118,9 +118,11 @@ private[spark] object RandomForest extends Logging {
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132#discussion_r72011582
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1774,6 +1775,49 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132#discussion_r72011413
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1774,6 +1775,49 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14336#discussion_r72011376
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -118,9 +118,11 @@ private[spark] object RandomForest extends Logging {
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132#discussion_r72011394
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1774,6 +1775,49 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14333
I don't understand the last change. As far as I can see it can be destroyed
inside the loop iteration. It's also possible to reuse the broadcast (declare
outside the loop), and unpersist each
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14296#discussion_r72011203
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1207,6 +1207,12 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132#discussion_r72011145
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1774,6 +1775,49 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14331
**[Test build #62798 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62798/consoleFull)**
for PR 14331 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14334
BTW can you change the title to say "Remove extra whitespace in SQL
generation for window functions"?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14297
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14297
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62786/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14297
**[Test build #62786 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62786/consoleFull)**
for PR 14297 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14334
**[Test build #62797 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62797/consoleFull)**
for PR 14334 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14331#discussion_r72010784
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -173,8 +190,18 @@ case class CatalogTable(
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13077#discussion_r72010691
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -502,41 +502,53 @@ private[spark] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14339
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14339
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62787/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14339
**[Test build #62787 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62787/consoleFull)**
for PR 14339 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14334
@rxin @dongjoon-hyun Thanks! JIRA ticket added and updated the golden files.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132#discussion_r72010521
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1774,6 +1775,49 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14257
**[Test build #62796 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62796/consoleFull)**
for PR 14257 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14296#discussion_r72009959
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1207,6 +1207,12 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14332#discussion_r72009839
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/DataFrameExample.scala ---
@@ -54,14 +54,13 @@ object DataFrameExample {
}
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14331
Overall LGTM, a few minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14331#discussion_r72009811
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/BucketedReadSuite.scala ---
@@ -20,10 +20,11 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.sources
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14331#discussion_r72009802
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -110,6 +110,25 @@ case class CatalogTablePartition(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14331#discussion_r72009804
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -173,8 +190,18 @@ case class CatalogTable(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14340
**[Test build #62795 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62795/consoleFull)**
for PR 14340 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14342
**[Test build #62794 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62794/consoleFull)**
for PR 14342 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14296#discussion_r72009643
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1207,6 +1207,12 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14296#discussion_r72009599
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,14 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14296#discussion_r72009571
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1207,6 +1207,12 @@ class Analyzer(
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14342
[SPARK-16685] Remove audit-release scripts.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch removes dev/audit-release. It was initially created to do basic
release auditing, but we
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14333
**[Test build #62793 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62793/consoleFull)**
for PR 14333 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327#discussion_r72009385
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -150,11 +150,13 @@ class SimpleTestOptimizer extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14339
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14339
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62785/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14339
**[Test build #62785 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62785/consoleFull)**
for PR 14339 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313
**[Test build #62792 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62792/consoleFull)**
for PR 14313 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13077
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62783/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14337
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13077
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14337
@ooq next time please open a pull request against master branch rather than
2.0. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13077
**[Test build #62783 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62783/consoleFull)**
for PR 13077 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14341
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14337
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14339
**[Test build #62791 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62791/consoleFull)**
for PR 14339 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327#discussion_r72008673
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -150,11 +150,13 @@ class SimpleTestOptimizer extends
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14341
cc @cloud-fan @liancheng Just minor document changes. Please review if this
change is proper. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14339
LGTM, cc @liancheng to take another look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327#discussion_r72008576
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -150,11 +150,13 @@ class SimpleTestOptimizer extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14339#discussion_r72008560
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2982,4 +2982,19 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14341
**[Test build #62790 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62790/consoleFull)**
for PR 14341 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313
LGTM except some style comments, thanks for working on it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313#discussion_r72008447
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -322,46 +322,133 @@ private[sql] class JDBCRDD(
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14341
[Minor][Doc][SQL] Fix two documents regarding size in bytes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix two places in SQLConf documents regarding size in bytes and statistics.
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313#discussion_r72008403
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -322,46 +322,133 @@ private[sql] class JDBCRDD(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327#discussion_r72008303
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -150,11 +150,13 @@ class SimpleTestOptimizer extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327#discussion_r72008210
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -150,11 +150,13 @@ class SimpleTestOptimizer extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14340
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14340
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62784/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14340
**[Test build #62784 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62784/consoleFull)**
for PR 14340 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132#discussion_r72008134
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1774,6 +1775,49 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62782/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327
**[Test build #62782 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62782/consoleFull)**
for PR 14327 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313
@cloud-fan I just addressed your comments. I added another argument in
`JDBCConversion` for `MutableRow` so that we can avoid type-boxing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313
**[Test build #62789 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62789/consoleFull)**
for PR 14313 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313#discussion_r72007301
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -407,84 +496,8 @@ private[sql] class JDBCRDD(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327
**[Test build #62788 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62788/consoleFull)**
for PR 14327 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327
Besides, according to the JIRA, this may need to be backported to 1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327
cc @cloud-fan @liancheng @yhuai Please review this change. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14339
**[Test build #62787 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62787/consoleFull)**
for PR 14339 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14331
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62777/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14331
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14331
**[Test build #62777 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62777/consoleFull)**
for PR 14331 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14331
**[Test build #62776 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62776/consoleFull)**
for PR 14331 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14297
**[Test build #62786 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62786/consoleFull)**
for PR 14297 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14331
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14331
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62776/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14204
In my test, the column does not exist.
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:41 PM -0700, "Tao Lin"
wrote:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14339
Sure!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14297
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62775/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313#discussion_r72005471
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -407,84 +496,8 @@ private[sql] class JDBCRDD(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313#discussion_r72005487
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -322,46 +322,135 @@ private[sql] class JDBCRDD(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14297
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14297
**[Test build #62775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62775/consoleFull)**
for PR 14297 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313#discussion_r72005398
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -322,46 +322,135 @@ private[sql] class JDBCRDD(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313#discussion_r72005309
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -322,46 +322,135 @@ private[sql] class JDBCRDD(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313#discussion_r72005232
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -407,84 +496,8 @@ private[sql] class JDBCRDD(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14333
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14333
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62779/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14333
**[Test build #62779 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62779/consoleFull)**
for PR 14333 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313#discussion_r72005172
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -407,84 +496,8 @@ private[sql] class JDBCRDD(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14313#discussion_r72005085
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -322,46 +322,135 @@ private[sql] class JDBCRDD(
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14339
can we test it in `SQLQuerySuite` or something? I think
`FileSourceStrategySuite` should be used to test the strategy.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14339
**[Test build #62785 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62785/consoleFull)**
for PR 14339 at commit
1 - 100 of 290 matches
Mail list logo