Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63035/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
**[Test build #63035 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63035/consoleFull)**
for PR 14182 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14416
This looks reasonable pending tests and verifying no more kafka deprecation
warnings in the build logs for this file :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14418
**[Test build #63037 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63037/consoleFull)**
for PR 14418 at commit
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14418
[SPARK-16813][SQL] Remove private[sql] and private[spark] from catalyst
package
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The catalyst package is meant to be internal, and as a result
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14416#discussion_r72882305
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka010/KafkaTestUtils.scala
---
@@ -178,8 +178,9 @@ private[kafka010] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14399
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63031/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14399
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14399
**[Test build #63031 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63031/consoleFull)**
for PR 14399 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14399
Please let me cc @srowen here as well because it is anyway about building.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14417
**[Test build #63036 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63036/consoleFull)**
for PR 14417 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14416
Please let me cc @srowen as well because it is anyway about building.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14417
[SPARK-16812] Open up SparkILoop.getAddedJars
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch makes SparkILoop.getAddedJars a public developer API. It is a
useful function to get
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
**[Test build #63035 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63035/consoleFull)**
for PR 14182 at commit
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40
**[Test build #85 has
started](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/85/consoleFull)**
for PR 40 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14389
**[Test build #63034 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63034/consoleFull)**
for PR 14389 at commit
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40
**[Test build #84 has
started](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/84/consoleFull)**
for PR 40 at commit
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14389#discussion_r72881850
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -99,45 +99,13 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14416
**[Test build #63033 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63033/consoleFull)**
for PR 14416 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14416
Could you please take a look, @koeninger and @holdenk ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14416
[SPARK-16776][STREAMING] Replace deprecated API in KafkaTestUtils for
0.10.0.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR replaces the old Kafka API to 0.10.0 ones in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63032/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
**[Test build #63032 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63032/consoleFull)**
for PR 13713 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14366
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
**[Test build #63032 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63032/consoleFull)**
for PR 13713 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14399
**[Test build #63031 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63031/consoleFull)**
for PR 14399 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63029/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
**[Test build #63029 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63029/consoleFull)**
for PR 14407 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14399
@holdenk Yes, the some tests in `ParquetSchemaSuite`. If I remember
correctly this, they were,
```
Backwards-compatibility: LIST with nullable element type - 2
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410#discussion_r72880810
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -236,6 +236,11 @@ case class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14395
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14395
LGTM. Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r72880758
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -596,6 +688,68 @@ setMethod("spark.survreg", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r72880737
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -291,6 +299,88 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori =
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14258
For my comment on
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14258#discussion_r72683426
Like this:
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14258#discussion_r72880687
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/install.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14395
**[Test build #3198 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3198/consoleFull)**
for PR 14395 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384#discussion_r72880604
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib.R ---
@@ -454,4 +454,48 @@ test_that("spark.survreg", {
}
})
+test_that("spark.als",
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384#discussion_r72880581
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +642,137 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384#discussion_r72880583
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +642,137 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384#discussion_r72880568
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +642,137 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384#discussion_r72880558
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -61,7 +68,7 @@ setClass("KMeansModel", representation(jobj = "jobj"))
#' @name write.ml
#' @export
#'
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63028/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
**[Test build #63028 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63028/consoleFull)**
for PR 14398 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410#discussion_r72880504
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -236,6 +236,11 @@ case class
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14258#discussion_r72880489
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/install.R ---
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
#' \code{without-hadoop}.
#'
#' @param hadoopVersion Version of Hadoop to install.
Github user yucai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14366
@rxin this PR has passed tests, could you kindly take a look at? Much
thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14400#discussion_r72880474
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CastSuite.scala
---
@@ -727,6 +727,19 @@ class CastSuite extends
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14346#discussion_r72880469
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -119,7 +121,7 @@ NULL
#' @note spark.glm since 2.0.0
#' @seealso \link{glm}, \link{read.ml}
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14346#discussion_r72880472
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -165,8 +172,8 @@ setMethod("spark.glm", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula"),
#' @note glm
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14392#discussion_r72880444
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib.R ---
@@ -454,4 +454,66 @@ test_that("spark.survreg", {
}
})
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14392#discussion_r72880430
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +659,106 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14392#discussion_r72880418
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +659,106 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14392#discussion_r72880413
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +659,106 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14392#discussion_r72880405
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +659,106 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14392#discussion_r72880330
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +659,106 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
Github user ckadner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398#discussion_r72880137
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -875,11 +877,12 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63030/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
**[Test build #63030 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63030/consoleFull)**
for PR 14398 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14414
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
**[Test build #63030 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63030/consoleFull)**
for PR 14398 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14414
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63027/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14414
**[Test build #63027 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63027/consoleFull)**
for PR 14414 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398#discussion_r72879633
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -875,11 +877,11 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
**[Test build #63029 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63029/consoleFull)**
for PR 14407 at commit
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40
**[Test build #83 has
finished](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/83/consoleFull)**
for PR 40 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
**[Test build #63028 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63028/consoleFull)**
for PR 14398 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14110
**[Test build #3197 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3197/consoleFull)**
for PR 14110 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398#discussion_r72878822
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -875,11 +877,11 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14395
**[Test build #3198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3198/consoleFull)**
for PR 14395 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14396
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14396
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63024/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14396
**[Test build #63024 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63024/consoleFull)**
for PR 14396 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63025/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user breakdawn closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14404
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410
**[Test build #63025 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63025/consoleFull)**
for PR 14410 at commit
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14258#discussion_r72878447
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -365,6 +365,23 @@ sparkR.session <- function(
}
overrideEnvs(sparkConfigMap, paramMap)
}
+
Github user junyangq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14258
@mengxr @shivaram @felixcheung Thank you for the discussion and review of
this PR. For compatibility of SparkR version and the JARs, perhaps it's better
to send the PR and try to merge into branch
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398#discussion_r72877870
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -875,11 +877,11 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37
**[Test build #82 has
finished](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/82/consoleFull)**
for PR 37 at commit
Github user junyangq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
@wangmiao1981 not sure if R formula an essential need here, since there is
only one feature variable. If used, perhaps we need a test to verify only one
variable is included on the right hand side
Github user ckadner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398#discussion_r72877468
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -875,11 +877,11 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63023/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #63023 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63023/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398#discussion_r72877149
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -875,11 +877,11 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user ckadner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398#discussion_r72876907
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -875,11 +877,11 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14346
cc: @junyangq
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
**[Test build #63022 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63022/consoleFull)**
for PR 14355 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63022/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14415
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14413
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user lovexi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14415
[SPARK-16810] Refactor registerSinks with multiple constructos
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For some metrics, it may require some **app detailed information** from
1 - 100 of 380 matches
Mail list logo
