Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
@felixcheung Checking whether it is running from shell is not exactly the
same as checking which shell is calling it. My approach is depends on the fact
that the Logging trait is used in three
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14471
Can you add a test case?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
I think both checks are a bit fragile and would be great to a single way to
check if running as shell that is shared, and that could be what
SparkSubmit.scala call as well.
Would be
Github user maver1ck closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14390
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user maver1ck commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14390
Done.
Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
yea, it looks much better. Although golden files are always generated, we
should make it easy to read and verify its correctness.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475
**[Test build #63156 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63156/consoleFull)**
for PR 14475 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475#discussion_r73283038
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillReader.java
---
@@ -50,7 +55,19 @@ public
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475#discussion_r73283047
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillReader.java
---
@@ -31,6 +34,8 @@
* of the file
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
I don't think these golden files should be manually created. They should
always be generated. I tried JSON earlier and it was not very friendly either
(worse than XML in this case).
Do
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Actually I've already tried to change the classes to be public, and open
them to not only `[r]` but every module which still does not work.
And exactly, above comment msg is the only
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
Is there any case that people need to write a golden file themselves? If we
wanna use some standard formats, I prefer json over xml.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12983
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12983
**[Test build #63155 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63155/consoleFull)**
for PR 12983 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12983
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63155/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Actually I don't have an excellent debug way for SparkR wrappers. Usually
you can create a ```RWrapperSuite``` and test whether it works well in the
Scala side (If you encounter some issues
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
@felixcheung "I think we might have a need to create a helper for "am I
running in the SparkR shell" function?" Do you mean for #14258 ? Not for this
PR, right?
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12983
**[Test build #63155 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63155/consoleFull)**
for PR 12983 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63153/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475
**[Test build #63153 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63153/consoleFull)**
for PR 14475 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
For output file -- one other way I thought about was to use
```
-- query 1
query
-- query 1: schema
schema
-- query 1: result
result
-- query 2
query
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63152/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
**[Test build #63152 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63152/consoleFull)**
for PR 14136 at commit
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472#discussion_r73281256
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472#discussion_r73281270
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472#discussion_r73281221
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/number-format.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+-- Verifies how we parse numbers
+
+-- parse
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14446
**[Test build #63154 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63154/consoleFull)**
for PR 14446 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472#discussion_r73280922
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/number-format.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+-- Verifies how we parse numbers
+
+-- parse as
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472#discussion_r73280876
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472#discussion_r73280720
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14474
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63151/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14474
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14474
**[Test build #63151 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63151/consoleFull)**
for PR 14474 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63149/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
**[Test build #63149 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63149/consoleFull)**
for PR 14472 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14471
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63150/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14471
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14471
**[Test build #63150 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63150/consoleFull)**
for PR 14471 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475#discussion_r73278229
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillReader.java
---
@@ -50,7 +55,19 @@ public
Github user gurvindersingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13950
@ajbozarth it seems @tgravescs is busy, is anybody else then who you think
could help us in merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475#discussion_r73278175
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillReader.java
---
@@ -31,6 +34,8 @@
* of the file format).
Github user eyalfa commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
As a separate till running before CleanupAliases?
I'll sketch something later today.
On Aug 3, 2016 04:07, "Wenchen Fan" wrote:
> I'd like to make
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
Seems like a good idea.
@cloud-fan can you review?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14110
cc @kayousterhout
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475
**[Test build #63153 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63153/consoleFull)**
for PR 14475 at commit
GitHub user tejasapatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475
[SPARK-16862] Configurable buffer size in `UnsafeSorterSpillReader`
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16862
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user lovexi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14110
Ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
**[Test build #63152 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63152/consoleFull)**
for PR 14136 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14474
**[Test build #63151 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63151/consoleFull)**
for PR 14474 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14470
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14470
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63146/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14470
**[Test build #63146 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63146/consoleFull)**
for PR 14470 at commit
GitHub user clockfly opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14474
[SPARK-16853][SQL] fixes encoder error in DataSet typed select
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For DataSet typed select:
```
def select[U1: Encoder](c1:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14473
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user ZunwenYou opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14473
[SPARK-16495] Add ADMM optimizer in mllib package
Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) is well suited to
distributed convex optimization, and in particular to large-scale problems
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14471
**[Test build #63150 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63150/consoleFull)**
for PR 14471 at commit
Github user rajeshbalamohan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14471
Fixed scalastyle issues
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
@vanzin , I did refactoring on some interfaces, especially for
`obtainCredentials` method, and the implementation of `HDFSCredentialProvider`
and `HiveCredential`, would you please help to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
**[Test build #63149 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63149/consoleFull)**
for PR 14472 at commit
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472#discussion_r73272864
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472#discussion_r73272873
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63148/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
**[Test build #63148 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63148/consoleFull)**
for PR 14472 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
**[Test build #63148 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63148/consoleFull)**
for PR 14472 at commit
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
cc @cloud-fan and @rxin for feedback.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472#discussion_r73272687
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
GitHub user petermaxlee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
[SPARK-16866][SQL] Infrastructure for file-based SQL end-to-end tests
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch introduces SQLQueryTestSuite, which is a basic framework
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14471
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63147/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14471
**[Test build #63147 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63147/consoleFull)**
for PR 14471 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14471
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14450
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63145/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14450
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14471
**[Test build #63147 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63147/consoleFull)**
for PR 14471 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14450
**[Test build #63145 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63145/consoleFull)**
for PR 14450 at commit
Github user rajeshbalamohan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12293
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user rajeshbalamohan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12293
@yuananf Thanks for trying it out. I have rebased it and created
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14471. Closing this one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
GitHub user rajeshbalamohan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14471
[SPARK-14387][SQL] Exceptions thrown when querying ORC tables
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR improves ORCFileFormat to handle cases when schema stored in
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14449
Hi @srowen, thanks for your comment.
I agree for your comment, user can get the number of features without
percentage method. For the user experience, sometimes the percentage method
seems
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63144/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #63144 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63144/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
awesome!
I think we might have a need to create a helper for "am I running in the
SparkR shell" function?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14258#issuecomment-236336042
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14470
**[Test build #63146 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63146/consoleFull)**
for PR 14470 at commit
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14470
[SPARK-16863][ML] ProbabilisticClassifier.fit check threshoulds' length
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add threshoulds' length checking for Classifiers which
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14468
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14468
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63142/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14468
**[Test build #63142 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63142/consoleFull)**
for PR 14468 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13624
@mhmoudr There were a few follow-up comments on your PR commit, visible
here:
[https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/393db655c3c43155305fbba1b2f8c48a95f18d93]
Could you please send a quick
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
I'd like to make `CreateStruct` just a place holder, and create a new rule
in `Analyzer` to always convert `CreateStruct` to `CreateNamedStruct`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14450
**[Test build #63145 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63145/consoleFull)**
for PR 14450 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14458
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14458
LGTM, merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14469
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63143/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14469
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #63144 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63144/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
1 - 100 of 454 matches
Mail list logo