Github user cjjnjust commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172#discussion_r80846949
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/aes/SparkAesCipher.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
Yeah, @HyukjinKwon . This PR is just to rewrite the implementation. No need
to resolve all the comments here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15257
**[Test build #66023 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66023/consoleFull)**
for PR 15257 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897#discussion_r80846005
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SharedState.scala ---
@@ -37,39 +37,14 @@ import
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263#discussion_r80845890
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1058,7 +1059,21 @@ the Data Sources API. The following options are
supported:
The JDBC fetch
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263#discussion_r80845726
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -50,67 +51,48 @@ class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15213#discussion_r80845291
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2105,6 +2107,59 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15213#discussion_r80845128
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2105,6 +2107,59 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15213#discussion_r80845459
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2105,6 +2107,59 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15213#discussion_r80845506
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2105,6 +2107,59 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15213#discussion_r80845188
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2105,6 +2107,59 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15213#discussion_r80844742
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1256,11 +1257,13 @@ class DAGScheduler(
if
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15213#discussion_r80844841
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2105,6 +2107,59 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15213#discussion_r80844780
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ import org.apache.spark._
import
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
@gatorsmile Would this be sensible if I submit another PR to clean up
options for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263#issuecomment-250072008
later as strictly the purpose of this PR is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15257
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66022/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15257
**[Test build #66022 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66022/consoleFull)**
for PR 15257 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15257
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263#discussion_r80845381
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -50,67 +51,48 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15257
**[Test build #66022 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66022/consoleFull)**
for PR 15257 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15257#discussion_r80845375
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/literals.scala
---
@@ -52,13 +53,51 @@ object Literal {
case t:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
**[Test build #66021 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66021/consoleFull)**
for PR 14897 at commit
Github user JasonMWhite commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15254
@JoshRosen @lins05 As requested, I've removed all remaining explicit
mentions of `ListConverter` and `MapConverter` as they seemed to all be doing
the same thing - getting around
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263#discussion_r80844741
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -50,67 +51,48 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15275
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15275
**[Test build #66020 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66020/consoleFull)**
for PR 15275 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15275
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66020/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66018/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273
**[Test build #66018 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66018/consoleFull)**
for PR 15273 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66017/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273
**[Test build #66017 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66017/consoleFull)**
for PR 15273 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
Good idea. Yes I will.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
Regarding the JDBC options, which properties are used for the table
reading? Which ones are used for writing? Can you please improve the document
and make users easily find the answer?
---
If
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15258
@frreiss That is correct, I will look into it. Moving the PR to WIP, as at
least I would like to document these situations.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239
re: test - I mean for each function we are adding the `...` param, that we
have a test for calling it without the extra stuff, ie.
one test with
```
write.json(df, jsonPath)
```
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15275
**[Test build #66020 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66020/consoleFull)**
for PR 15275 at commit
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15275
[SPARK-17702][SQL] Code generation including too many mutable states
exceeds JVM size limit.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Code generation including too many mutable
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239#discussion_r80841590
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/utils.R ---
@@ -342,7 +342,8 @@ varargsToStrEnv <- function(...) {
for (name in names(pairs)) {
value <- pairs[[name]]
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239#discussion_r80841566
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -328,6 +328,7 @@ setMethod("toDF", signature(x = "RDD"),
#' It goes through the entire dataset once to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14646
**[Test build #66019 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66019/consoleFull)**
for PR 14646 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239#discussion_r80841401
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -55,6 +55,19 @@ setMethod("initialize", "SparkDataFrame",
function(.Object, sdf, isCached) {
.Object
})
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239#discussion_r80841143
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/utils.R ---
@@ -334,6 +334,27 @@ varargsToEnv <- function(...) {
env
}
+# Utility function to capture the varargs
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66014/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15232
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273
**[Test build #66014 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66014/consoleFull)**
for PR 15273 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14818
make sense, I think then we should have a separate function
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66013/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
**[Test build #66013 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66013/consoleFull)**
for PR 15247 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15272
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15272
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66010/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15272
**[Test build #66010 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66010/consoleFull)**
for PR 15272 at commit
Github user frreiss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15258
This change allows FileInputStream to consume partial outputs of a system
such as Hadoop or another copy of Spark, provided that the system adheres
rigidly to the write policy of recent versions of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66012/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
**[Test build #66012 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66012/consoleFull)**
for PR 15263 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66011/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
**[Test build #66011 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66011/consoleFull)**
for PR 15263 at commit
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15258#discussion_r80838376
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ListingFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -50,6 +50,19 @@ class ListingFileCatalog(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15271
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15271
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66009/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15271
**[Test build #66009 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66009/consoleFull)**
for PR 15271 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273
**[Test build #66018 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66018/consoleFull)**
for PR 15273 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15213
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15213
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66006/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15213
**[Test build #66006 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66006/consoleFull)**
for PR 15213 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274#discussion_r80837055
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -467,3 +469,26 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273
**[Test build #66017 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66017/consoleFull)**
for PR 15273 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15267
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15267
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66015/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15267
**[Test build #66015 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66015/consoleFull)**
for PR 15267 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274#discussion_r80836637
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -467,3 +469,26 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66008/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
**[Test build #66008 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66008/consoleFull)**
for PR 14638 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66007/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
**[Test build #66007 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66007/consoleFull)**
for PR 14897 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
FYI: #15274 adds support for parsing JSON from the key/value into a Spark
SQL `StructType`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66016/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274
**[Test build #66016 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66016/consoleFull)**
for PR 15274 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274
**[Test build #66016 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66016/consoleFull)**
for PR 15274 at commit
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274
[SPARK-17699] Support for parsing JSON string columns
Spark SQL has great support for reading text files that contain JSON data.
However, in many cases the JSON data is just one column amongst
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15267
**[Test build #66015 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66015/consoleFull)**
for PR 15267 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9
@yinxusen Looking good. I left a few small comments, and we should take
care of the checking of initial model params in the read/write test now. After
that, I think it will be ready to merge.
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r80834369
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/ReadWrite.scala ---
@@ -300,15 +301,23 @@ private[ml] object DefaultParamsWriter {
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r80835092
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeansSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,12 +17,19 @@
package org.apache.spark.ml.clustering
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r80835086
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeansSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,12 +17,19 @@
package org.apache.spark.ml.clustering
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r80835233
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeansSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,12 +17,19 @@
package org.apache.spark.ml.clustering
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15267
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15189#discussion_r80835147
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryColumnarQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -232,4 +232,29 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66003/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
**[Test build #66003 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66003/consoleFull)**
for PR 15248 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15189#discussion_r80834862
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryColumnarQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -232,4 +232,29 @@ class
1 - 100 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
