Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766#discussion_r82450939
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -202,6 +202,10 @@ def registerFunction(self, name, f,
returnType=StringType()):
"""
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963
I think this could be a good change for allowing more developers to onboard
with PySpark - is there any interest in the current PySpark/Build focused
committers [ @davies @srowen @rxin ] in seeing
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #66506 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66506/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15393#discussion_r82450501
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239#discussion_r82450472
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -341,11 +342,13 @@ setMethod("toDF", signature(x = "RDD"),
#' @name read.json
#' @method read.json
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601
Thanks for the comments @MLnick @jkbradley @sethah
I have sent update according to the comments and change
`ImputerModel.surrogate` and persistence format into DataFrame.
As for the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66507/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
Maybe @marmbrus could take a look if @davies is busy?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15393
**[Test build #66521 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66521/consoleFull)**
for PR 15393 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #66507 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66507/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14653
Huh I'm not sure why jenkins isn't picking this up - @jkbradley or
@davidnavas can you tell jenkins this is ok to test again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15393#discussion_r82449644
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ class
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15355
Also check-picked this one into branch 2.0 since it's also helpful for 2.0
backport PRs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15393#discussion_r82449290
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15393#discussion_r82449361
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15384
**[Test build #66520 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66520/consoleFull)**
for PR 15384 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15384
Since deleting a normal topic may be timeout as well:
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15365
It would be great to get some feedback on the name `spark.logit`
What do folks think about it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15365#discussion_r82448237
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -647,6 +654,195 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"KMeansModel"),
predict_internal(object,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66517/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
**[Test build #66517 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66517/consoleFull)**
for PR 15375 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15393
**[Test build #66519 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66519/consoleFull)**
for PR 15393 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
Oh, thank you for pointing this out.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15393
@yhuai @zsxwing Do you mind if I ask to take a look please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Related to the docs, some more comments defining terminology would be
useful for non-experts:
* OR-amplification
* probing buckets
* false positives/negatives (w.r.t. finding nearest
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15393
[HOTFIX][BUILD] Do not use contains in Option in JdbcRelationProvider
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes the fix the use of `contains` API which only
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
**[Test build #66517 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66517/consoleFull)**
for PR 15375 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15366
**[Test build #66518 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66518/consoleFull)**
for PR 15366 at commit
Github user zsxwing closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15367
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14561
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user falaki commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375#discussion_r82446808
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/context.R ---
@@ -123,19 +126,48 @@ parallelize <- function(sc, coll, numSlices = 1) {
if (numSlices > length(coll))
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15366
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445466
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445905
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSHTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445623
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445705
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RandomProjection.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445915
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSHTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445482
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445651
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445670
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445698
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445744
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RandomProjection.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445909
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSHTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445506
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445715
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RandomProjection.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445919
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSHTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445897
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RandomProjection.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445477
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445726
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RandomProjection.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445890
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RandomProjection.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601
**[Test build #66516 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66516/consoleFull)**
for PR 11601 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
# Packaging:
1. this addresses the problem that it's not always immediately obvious to
people what they have to do to get, say s3a working. Do you know precisely
which version of
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445385
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,334 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239#discussion_r82445435
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -341,11 +342,13 @@ setMethod("toDF", signature(x = "RDD"),
#' @name read.json
#' @method read.json
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82445404
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,334 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15366
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66508/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15367
Thanks! I'm going to merge this one since the concern from @koeninger is
addressed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15366
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15366
**[Test build #66508 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66508/consoleFull)**
for PR 15366 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15389#discussion_r82443930
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -2029,7 +2030,11 @@ def coalesce(self, numPartitions, shuffle=False):
>>> sc.parallelize([1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15389#discussion_r82444378
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -2029,7 +2030,11 @@ def coalesce(self, numPartitions, shuffle=False):
>>> sc.parallelize([1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354#discussion_r82443073
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/JsonExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -343,4 +343,23 @@ class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14087
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
Option.contains is only in Scala 2.11...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
Seems it breaks scala 2.10 compilation. Can you take a look? Thanks!
```
[error]
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14087
Thanks, merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
**[Test build #66515 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66515/consoleFull)**
for PR 14426 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
Hi, @gatorsmile .
Could you review this PR when you have some time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377#discussion_r82441129
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2474,25 +2474,36 @@ private[spark] class CallerContext(
val context =
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
Yeah I figured you'd need to run `./dev/test-dependencies.sh
--replace-manifest` here
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15370
Ah you are right, sorry I totally missed that this is purely a sorting
problem. I was thinking the %05d was causing an issue but it doesn't.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15370
**[Test build #66514 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66514/consoleFull)**
for PR 15370 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
@steveloughran can you clarify what this does? It seems like just 5000
lines of examples and test cases? Users can already use these cloud stores by
just adding the proper dependencies, can't they?
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15390
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dhruve commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15370
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user dhruve commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15370
All tests passed. Error unrelated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66513/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #66513 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66513/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
Thanks! Merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15392
**[Test build #66511 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66511/consoleFull)**
for PR 15392 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #66513 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66513/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15391
**[Test build #66512 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66512/consoleFull)**
for PR 15391 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15392
cc @marmbrus want to review this? It is pretty important to make sure the
APIs are properly annotated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15392
[SPARK-17830] Annotat spark.sql package with InterfaceStability
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch annotates the InterfaceStability level for top level classes in
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15391
[MINOR][ML]:remove redundant comment in LogisticRegression
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
While adding R wrapper for LogisticRegression, I found one extra comment.
It
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15381
FYI, I fixed import conflicts in JettyUtils manually for branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15374#discussion_r82433404
--- Diff:
common/tags/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/annotation/InterfaceStability.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15381
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15381
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15390
**[Test build #66510 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66510/consoleFull)**
for PR 15390 at commit
Github user zhzhan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15218
@mridulm Thanks for the comments. Your concern regarding the locality is
right. The patch does not change this behavior, which takes priority of
locality preference. But if multiple executors
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15390
cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15390
[SPARK-17806] [SQL] fix bug in join key rewritten in HashJoin
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In HashJoin, we try to rewrite the join key as Long to improve the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15374
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15365
cc @sethah @yanboliang
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
401 - 500 of 677 matches
Mail list logo
