Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897#discussion_r82658617
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalog/Catalog.scala ---
@@ -262,15 +262,33 @@ abstract class Catalog {
options: Map[String,
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15392
LGTM, merging to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14365
@cloud-fan actually, this conversion was disabled because of this bug.
btw, pr that @cloud-fan mentioned is
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690.
I think it is better to hold
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66672/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
**[Test build #66672 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66672/consoleFull)**
for PR 15386 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319
**[Test build #3319 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3319/consoleFull)**
for PR 15319 at commit
Github user jodersky commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15398
cc @viirya, I changed your original code
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15419
**[Test build #3318 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3318/consoleFull)**
for PR 15419 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
**[Test build #66674 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66674/consoleFull)**
for PR 15408 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15419
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15419
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82655690
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15358#discussion_r82655758
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -52,9 +52,15 @@ case class CatalogStorageFormat(
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342#discussion_r82654945
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -258,149 +252,106 @@ class KMeans private (
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66658/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319
**[Test build #66658 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66658/consoleFull)**
for PR 15319 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66673/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342
**[Test build #66673 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66673/consoleFull)**
for PR 15342 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342
**[Test build #66673 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66673/consoleFull)**
for PR 15342 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342#discussion_r82653577
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -258,149 +252,106 @@ class KMeans private (
}
}
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10342
One thing I noticed when I was reviewing another pr just now: in the future
we should also include test cases when pulling in 3rd party code. Otherwise
it's pretty difficult to ensure correctness if
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342#discussion_r82652315
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -258,149 +252,106 @@ class KMeans private (
}
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
**[Test build #66672 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66672/consoleFull)**
for PR 15386 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82652845
--- Diff:
core/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStreamSuite.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342
@sethah OK I will add a new overload of `train` and deprecate the others.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13675
I just noticed that last item, but otherwise, this looks ready to me.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
Hmm, I don't think there should be a MiMa issue right? It passes locally
anyway.. let me try again
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342#discussion_r82650874
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -258,149 +252,106 @@ class KMeans private (
}
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15316#discussion_r82650465
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/AnalysisException.scala ---
@@ -43,6 +43,11 @@ class AnalysisException protected[sql] (
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14788#discussion_r82650345
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2548,16 +2548,20 @@ object functions {
def to_date(e: Column):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
**[Test build #66671 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66671/consoleFull)**
for PR 15408 at commit
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82649972
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342#discussion_r82649893
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -258,149 +252,106 @@ class KMeans private (
}
}
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342#discussion_r82649829
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -258,149 +252,106 @@ class KMeans private (
}
}
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Thanks for the updates @zjffdu, just 2 minor comments otherwise LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
**[Test build #66670 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66670/consoleFull)**
for PR 15408 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Yeah, the original fix was small and so it was ok to include it here, but
we are expanding the scope of the change so I think it's best to separate it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/6/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
**[Test build #6 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/6/consoleFull)**
for PR 15386 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959#discussion_r82649182
--- Diff: python/pyspark/conf.py ---
@@ -101,13 +109,25 @@ def __init__(self, loadDefaults=True, _jvm=None,
_jconf=None):
self._jconf =
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959#discussion_r82649091
--- Diff: python/pyspark/context.py ---
@@ -121,7 +121,15 @@ def __init__(self, master=None, appName=None,
sparkHome=None, pyFiles=None,
def
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342#discussion_r82648980
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -258,149 +252,106 @@ class KMeans private (
}
}
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342#discussion_r82648993
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -43,21 +43,21 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.random.XORShiftRandom
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15371
**[Test build #9 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/9/consoleFull)**
for PR 15371 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r82648263
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -217,7 +215,7 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15395
@davies I appreciate your efforts. I should have noticed this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13579
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13579
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66657/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13579
**[Test build #66657 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66657/consoleFull)**
for PR 13579 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82648052
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82648070
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/7/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
**[Test build #7 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/7/consoleFull)**
for PR 15408 at commit
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82647961
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82647991
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82648011
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82647820
--- Diff:
core/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStreamSuite.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82647832
--- Diff:
core/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStreamSuite.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
Thanks @srowen , I wasn't aware of that script. Hopefully this should be
good to go now!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
Thanks @srowen, @rxin for the review comments. I have addressed them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r82647560
--- Diff: mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/BLAS.scala
---
@@ -244,6 +244,15 @@ private[spark] object BLAS extends Serializable {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15316
**[Test build #8 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/8/consoleFull)**
for PR 15316 at commit
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82647539
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
**[Test build #7 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/7/consoleFull)**
for PR 15408 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r82647370
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/NormalEquationSolver.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82647325
--- Diff:
core/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStreamSuite.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13675
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13675
**[Test build #2 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2/consoleFull)**
for PR 13675 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13675
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #4 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342#discussion_r82646051
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -558,6 +475,7 @@ object KMeans {
* Trains a k-means model using
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342#discussion_r82634889
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -258,149 +252,106 @@ class KMeans private (
}
}
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342#discussion_r82625386
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -258,149 +252,106 @@ class KMeans private (
}
}
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15342#discussion_r82633045
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -258,149 +252,106 @@ class KMeans private (
}
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
**[Test build #6 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/6/consoleFull)**
for PR 15386 at commit
Github user seyfe commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15371#discussion_r82645595
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -55,7 +55,11 @@ object MimaExcludes {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15395
**[Test build #3317 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3317/consoleFull)**
for PR 15395 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13579
That doesn't answer my question, though. Why can't the history server
explicitly set that value to false after all the settings having been read from
wherever?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15316#discussion_r82643571
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/AnalysisException.scala ---
@@ -43,6 +43,11 @@ class AnalysisException protected[sql] (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13194
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13194
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15399
Thank you for commenting, @gatorsmile . So far, I asked @rxin and you. I'll
find another committer more closer this part.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13194
**[Test build #5 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5/consoleFull)**
for PR 13194 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82641642
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r82641617
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13194
**[Test build #5 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5/consoleFull)**
for PR 13194 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66656/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
**[Test build #66656 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66656/consoleFull)**
for PR 14731 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user davidnavas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14653
@holdenk happy to help if I can, is there something a mere mortal like
myself can accomplish? [dunno how to poke jenkins hereabouts]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user invkrh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15420
@srowen I have tested the code on spark 1.6.2. It works fine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13675
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/1/
Test FAILed.
---
401 - 500 of 780 matches
Mail list logo
