Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15649
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15649
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67621/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15649
**[Test build #67621 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67621/consoleFull)**
for PR 15649 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15636
@jkbradley @yanboliang Could you please make a review in your spare time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
It seems that many metrics in `MultinomialLogisticRegressionSummary` are
generic to other classification algos. So what about create a new class
`MultiClassificationSummary` and put it in a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
**[Test build #67626 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67626/consoleFull)**
for PR 15647 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15656
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67625 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67625/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15656
merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15642
LGTM, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15642
Thank you so much @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15642
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15656
**[Test build #67624 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67624/consoleFull)**
for PR 15656 at commit
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15656
[SPARK-18132] Fix checkstyle
This PR fixes checkstyle.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/yhuai/spark fix-format
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
```
[info] - SPARK-10562: partition by column with mixed case name *** FAILED
*** (605 milliseconds)
[info] java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException:
[info] at
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15651#discussion_r85266229
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExistingRDD.scala ---
@@ -130,17 +130,23 @@ case class ExternalRDDScanExec[T](
/**
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #67623 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67623/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15651#discussion_r85265891
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -482,6 +483,33 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67615/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15527#discussion_r85265049
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -121,16 +124,61 @@ private[kafka010] case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15527#discussion_r85265053
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -121,16 +124,61 @@ private[kafka010] case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #67622 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67622/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67615 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67615/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
@marmbrus Thank you so much.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15653
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15653
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67613/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15653
**[Test build #67613 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67613/consoleFull)**
for PR 15653 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15649
**[Test build #67621 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67621/consoleFull)**
for PR 15649 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15651
@yhuai We have `RDD.localCheckpoint` which provides alternative approach
to truncate periodically long lineages while skipping the expensive step of
replicating the materialized data in a reliable
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15649
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #67620 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67620/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15649
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15651
**[Test build #67619 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67619/consoleFull)**
for PR 15651 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15596
**[Test build #67618 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67618/consoleFull)**
for PR 15596 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15651#discussion_r85264291
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -919,6 +922,44 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15596
**[Test build #67617 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67617/consoleFull)**
for PR 15596 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15596#discussion_r85264043
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/limit.scala ---
@@ -27,32 +27,14 @@ import
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15596
@JoshRosen After few tries, I think to replace `CollectLimitExec` with
`GlobalLimitExec` is not a good idea.
The main reason is whole stage codegen. Since `GlobalLimitExec` supports
whole
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15655
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user vijoshi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15556
@vanzin @srowen - thanks, i've opened pull request #15655 on branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user vijoshi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15655
[SPARK-18010][CORE] Reduce work performed for building up the application
list for the History Server app list UI page
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
backport of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15527
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15527
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67616/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15527
**[Test build #67616 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67616/consoleFull)**
for PR 15527 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15654
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67614/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15654
**[Test build #67614 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67614/consoleFull)**
for PR 15654 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15654
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67612/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
**[Test build #67612 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67612/consoleFull)**
for PR 15513 at commit
Github user chuanlei closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15195
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user chuanlei commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15195
ok, I will close this pr.
Thanks for the reply.
@jerryshao @lw-lin @marmbrus @tdas
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15527
**[Test build #67616 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67616/consoleFull)**
for PR 15527 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15654
**[Test build #67614 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67614/consoleFull)**
for PR 15654 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67615 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67615/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15649
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67610/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67610 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67610/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
GitHub user techaddict opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15654
[SPARK-16881][MESOS] Migrate Mesos configs to use ConfigEntry
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Migrate Mesos configs to use ConfigEntry
## How was this patch
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67611/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67611 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67611/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15651#discussion_r85259326
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -919,6 +922,44 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLContext
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15527#discussion_r85258005
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -153,11 +201,7 @@ private[kafka010] case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15653
**[Test build #67613 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67613/consoleFull)**
for PR 15653 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15653
This is not a serious issue. And it doesn't affect correctness. I would
left this to @cloud-fan or @hvanhovell decide if we want to fix it or not.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15527#discussion_r85258039
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -133,6 +132,41 @@ class KafkaSourceSuite
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
@sethah @jkbradley
Now I am considering elemating the `probabilityToPredictionUDF`,
There are some fussy problems about the `predictionCol` and the summary
class hierarchy
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15653
[SQL] Don't add inferred redundant isnotnull condition from constraints
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `Optimizer`, we will infer additional conditions from
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15651
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67608/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15651
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15651
**[Test build #67608 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67608/consoleFull)**
for PR 15651 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r85254582
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/xpath.scala
---
@@ -107,9 +145,19 @@ case class XPathLong(xml:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r85254596
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/xpath.scala
---
@@ -120,9 +168,19 @@ case class XPathFloat(xml:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
**[Test build #67612 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67612/consoleFull)**
for PR 15513 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
I will take another look closely as suggested and then will let you all
know.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15527#discussion_r85253453
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -153,11 +201,7 @@ private[kafka010] case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15629
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67607/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15629
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67609/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15629
**[Test build #67607 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67607/consoleFull)**
for PR 15629 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #67609 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67609/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15612#discussion_r85251773
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ZippedPartitionsRDD.scala ---
@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ private[spark] class ZippedPartitionsPartition(
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15612#discussion_r85251725
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ZipPartitionsRDDUtils.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15453
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15453
Thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15626
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67605/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15626
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67611 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67611/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15626
**[Test build #67605 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67605/consoleFull)**
for PR 15626 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67610 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67610/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r85192795
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -66,6 +77,29 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r85187855
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,11 +17,17 @@
package
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r85248527
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -282,6 +316,114 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r85248542
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -282,6 +316,114 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r85248691
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -282,6 +316,114 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
1 - 100 of 536 matches
Mail list logo
