Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/6/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373
**[Test build #6 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/6/consoleFull)**
for PR 13373 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373
**[Test build #6 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/6/consoleFull)**
for PR 13373 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15669
Quite strange `--files` in yarn-client will fall into `SparkContext`? AFAIK
it will be handled by yarn#client to add to distributed cache, it will not
involve SparkContext's addFiles.
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15683
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user actuaryzhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15683
[SPARK-18166][MLib] Fix Poisson GLM bug due to wrong requirement of
response values
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current implementation of Poisson GLM
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637#discussion_r85652094
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/MapAggregate.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,324 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67776/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
**[Test build #67776 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67776/consoleFull)**
for PR 15666 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Dropping WIP since the jenkins integration appears to be functioning now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15682
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67775/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15682
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15682
**[Test build #67775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67775/consoleFull)**
for PR 15682 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
**[Test build #67776 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67776/consoleFull)**
for PR 15666 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417#discussion_r85650659
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FilterPushdownSuite.scala
---
@@ -1016,6 +1016,8 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417#discussion_r85650553
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FilterPushdownSuite.scala
---
@@ -1016,6 +1016,8 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15682
**[Test build #67775 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67775/consoleFull)**
for PR 15682 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15682
[SPARK-18169][SQL] Suppress warnings when dropping views on a dropped table
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Apache Spark 2.0.0 ~ 2.0.2-rc1 shows an
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67774/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
**[Test build #67774 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67774/consoleFull)**
for PR 15666 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
For large tables, the degraded performance should be considered a bug as
well.
How about this.
1) If direct sql is disabled, log a warning about degraded performance with
this flag and
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14937
@yanboliang I began to run some performance tests on this patch today. With
this patch the way it is, I am seeing a huge performance **_degradation_**. The
most critical reason is the slicing
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15538
Actually, this may not be working for remote executors. I tested this patch
running in local mode, but in running a version of this with actual remote
executors I'm seeing the original parquet log
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67772/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
**[Test build #67772 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67772/consoleFull)**
for PR 15673 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
**[Test build #67774 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67774/consoleFull)**
for PR 15666 at commit
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647470
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/PythonMLLibAPI.scala ---
@@ -1358,6 +1363,41 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647311
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/mllib/streaming_test_example.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647567
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/stat/test.py ---
@@ -80,3 +85,118 @@ class KolmogorovSmirnovTestResult(TestResult):
"""
Contains test
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647915
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/TestResult.scala ---
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ class KolmogorovSmirnovTestResult
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647656
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tests.py ---
@@ -1688,6 +1689,44 @@ def test_binary_term_freqs(self):
": expected
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647664
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tests.py ---
@@ -1688,6 +1689,44 @@ def test_binary_term_freqs(self):
": expected
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647454
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/PythonMLLibAPI.scala ---
@@ -1358,6 +1363,41 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647843
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/PythonMLLibAPI.scala ---
@@ -1576,17 +1616,49 @@ private[spark] object SerDe extends
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647607
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/stat/test.py ---
@@ -80,3 +85,118 @@ class KolmogorovSmirnovTestResult(TestResult):
"""
Contains test
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647232
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/mllib/streaming_test_example.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647320
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/PythonMLLibAPI.scala ---
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.mllib.regression._
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647221
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/mllib/streaming_test_example.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647632
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tests.py ---
@@ -1688,6 +1689,44 @@ def test_binary_term_freqs(self):
": expected
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647207
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/mllib/streaming_test_example.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647534
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/stat/test.py ---
@@ -15,10 +15,15 @@
# limitations under the License.
#
+from collections import
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647905
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/stat/test.py ---
@@ -80,3 +85,118 @@ class KolmogorovSmirnovTestResult(TestResult):
"""
Contains test
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647272
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/mllib/streaming_test_example.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11374#discussion_r85647289
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/mllib/streaming_test_example.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67773/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
**[Test build #67773 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67773/consoleFull)**
for PR 15666 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
**[Test build #67773 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67773/consoleFull)**
for PR 15666 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
**[Test build #67772 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67772/consoleFull)**
for PR 15673 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
The current merge conflict is from
d2d438d1d549628a0183e468ed11d6e85b5d6061, which touches the same code. I'll
wait for that to be settled before rebasing.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
> Could we enable this fallback only when the conf is set to false?
Otherwise, it might mask legitimate bugs.
Certainly, but my intent with this PR is to prevent a (painful and
confusing)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637#discussion_r85646444
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/MapAggregate.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,324 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15538
@srowen I ran my manual tests for this build and they worked as expected.
Can you merge this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67770/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257
**[Test build #67770 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67770/consoleFull)**
for PR 12257 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637#discussion_r85646119
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/MapAggregate.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,324 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67771/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373
**[Test build #67771 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67771/consoleFull)**
for PR 13373 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637#discussion_r85645925
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/MapAggregate.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,324 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637#discussion_r85645802
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/MapAggregateQuerySuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637#discussion_r85645776
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/MapAggregateQuerySuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67769/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ahmed-mahran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13866
Related PR #512
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
**[Test build #67769 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67769/consoleFull)**
for PR 15637 at commit
Github user ahmed-mahran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13866
@zsxwing, it is great that you have pointed to unallocated blocks, I've
missed those.
**What to clean?**
So, there are three kinds of stored blocks here: *unallocated stream
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
Could we enable this fallback only when the conf is set to false?
Otherwise, it might mask legitimate bugs.
I also wonder if some of our flaky tests around this issue are due to the
conf
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637#discussion_r85645394
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/MapAggregate.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,324 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15651#discussion_r85645164
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExistingRDD.scala ---
@@ -130,17 +130,40 @@ case class ExternalRDDScanExec[T](
/**
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15651#discussion_r85645138
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExistingRDD.scala ---
@@ -130,17 +130,40 @@ case class ExternalRDDScanExec[T](
/**
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373
**[Test build #67771 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67771/consoleFull)**
for PR 13373 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15471
Thanks @HyukjinKwon - The appveyor tests seem to pass as well
Change LGTM to merge to master. @felixcheung Any other comments ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677#discussion_r85644253
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -148,8 +171,15 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
How about splitting this PR to two parts? One is the document improvement
(fixing typos and adding examples). Another is to add argument descriptions
(many parts are not clearly defined. More
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15681
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67763/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15681
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15681
**[Test build #67763 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67763/consoleFull)**
for PR 15681 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
@srowen If the newly added contents are not right, should we commit them
and fix them later?
If this PR does not add argument descriptions, I am fine to merge it (after
one more pass)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257
**[Test build #67770 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67770/consoleFull)**
for PR 12257 at commit
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15603
The test failure doesn't seem to be due to my change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67764/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257
**[Test build #67764 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67764/consoleFull)**
for PR 12257 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
**[Test build #67769 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67769/consoleFull)**
for PR 15637 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15679
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15679
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67767/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15679
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15679
**[Test build #67767 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67767/consoleFull)**
for PR 15679 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15679
**[Test build #67766 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67766/consoleFull)**
for PR 15679 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15679
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67766/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15679
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15672
The failed test case looks not related to our change here. It didn't fail
in my local envirement.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
