Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13575
@lw-lin sorry we haven't visited this pr in the past, but the goal of this
pr will be accomplished by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17924
(as a side effect). It reduces a lot of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15706
**[Test build #3385 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3385/consoleFull)**
for PR 15706 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67869/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
**[Test build #67869 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67869/consoleFull)**
for PR 1 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15708
Ok interesting, it seems the test repeatedly fails. This probably means it
is a suite ordering issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
I see. That seems nice too but I hope the version is fixed if this one is
also fine too..
I am worried if the version is suddenly bumped up and some tests are failed
(at least, I was a
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710#discussion_r85878038
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.scala
---
@@ -84,17 +84,22 @@ case class
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
cc @ericl, @marmbrus, @zsxwing and @lw-lin (I guess this would supersede
your old PR).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user zjffdu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599#discussion_r85877935
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonWorkerFactory.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +84,66 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
**[Test build #67874 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67874/consoleFull)**
for PR 15710 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15703
I can't reproduce those test failures when executing failed test cases
individually. Seems that it's related to execution order. Still investigating.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user zjffdu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599#discussion_r85877793
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonWorkerFactory.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +84,66 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
**[Test build #67873 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67873/consoleFull)**
for PR 15710 at commit
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Thanks for the review @mridulm , this approach is trying the move the
overhead from user to cluster. User just need to specify the requirement file
and spark will set up the virtualenv
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
**[Test build #3384 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3384/consoleFull)**
for PR 15707 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
**[Test build #3387 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3387/consoleFull)**
for PR 15710 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67872/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
This approach is fine - The other thing we could do is just use the latest
stable version as described in https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/ -
If you see the link at the bottom it says
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
[SPARK-18025] Use commit protocol API in structured streaming
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds a new commit protocol implementation
ManifestFileCommitProtocol
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
Looks like the test failed due to a flaky test, but other than that
everything else was fine. I'm going to merge this optimistically.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
@rxin I believe https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18168 will need
to be resolved before I can rebase this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67865/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67864/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
**[Test build #67865 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67865/consoleFull)**
for PR 15707 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705
**[Test build #67864 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67864/consoleFull)**
for PR 15705 at commit
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705#discussion_r85875944
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/CatalogFileIndex.scala
---
@@ -67,7 +67,10 @@ class CatalogFileIndex(
Github user cjjnjust commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172#discussion_r85875690
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/SaslRpcHandler.java
---
@@ -80,46 +84,71 @@ public void
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15688
@gatorsmile that's a good point. I checked with hive, the behaviour is:
1. if the given partition spec specifies all partition columns, throw
exception if the partition not exist
2.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15688
**[Test build #67871 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67871/consoleFull)**
for PR 15688 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67863/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
**[Test build #67863 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67863/consoleFull)**
for PR 15541 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
@mallman can you bring this up-to-date?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67859/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
**[Test build #67859 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67859/consoleFull)**
for PR 15673 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
**[Test build #67870 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67870/consoleFull)**
for PR 15172 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67860/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
**[Test build #67860 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67860/consoleFull)**
for PR 15666 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599#discussion_r85859191
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonWorkerFactory.scala ---
@@ -55,6 +65,11 @@ private[spark] class
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599#discussion_r85860115
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonWorkerFactory.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +84,66 @@ private[spark] class
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599#discussion_r85872283
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonWorkerFactory.scala ---
@@ -307,6 +387,7 @@ private[spark] class
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599#discussion_r85859768
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonWorkerFactory.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +84,67 @@ private[spark] class
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599#discussion_r85859164
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonWorkerFactory.scala ---
@@ -46,6 +50,12 @@ private[spark] class
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599#discussion_r85859942
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonWorkerFactory.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +84,66 @@ private[spark] class
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599#discussion_r85859906
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonWorkerFactory.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +84,66 @@ private[spark] class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r85873381
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -631,6 +631,42 @@ private[spark] class HiveExternalCatalog(conf:
Github user eyalfa commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
@hvanhovell please have a look.
BTW, for some reason Jenkins shows all test cases as 'sql', see
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
**[Test build #67869 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67869/consoleFull)**
for PR 1 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
@HyukjinKwon Thanks for your time!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
(cc @nchammas too who I also guess met this issue first. I would like to
let him know.)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
Maybe, I might create a JIRA to describe the known issues with AppVeyor.
(does it make sense?)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15669
**[Test build #67868 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67868/consoleFull)**
for PR 15669 at commit
Github user zjffdu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15669#discussion_r85872343
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1716,29 +1716,12 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67857/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
**[Test build #67857 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67857/consoleFull)**
for PR 15704 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
**[Test build #67867 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67867/consoleFull)**
for PR 15709 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
cc @felixcheung, @shivaram, @srowen and @wangmiao1981 (who I believe met
this issue first).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
Build started: [SparkR] `ALL`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15626
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15626
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67845/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
**[Test build #67866 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67866/consoleFull)**
for PR 15702 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
**[Test build #67865 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67865/consoleFull)**
for PR 15707 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15626
**[Test build #67845 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67845/consoleFull)**
for PR 15626 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
[SPARK-18190][Build][SparkR] Fix R version to not the latest in AppVeyor
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, Spark supports the test on Windows via AppVeyor
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
**[Test build #3386 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3386/consoleFull)**
for PR 15707 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15706
**[Test build #3385 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3385/consoleFull)**
for PR 15706 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15706
Actually is there a test case you can create for this? Make sure the test
case would fail when the patch is not applied.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
This LGTM, just a minor comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67855/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
**[Test build #67855 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67855/consoleFull)**
for PR 15707 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15694
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15694
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67856/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15694
**[Test build #67856 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67856/consoleFull)**
for PR 15694 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15686
Never mind, @HyunjinKwon .
I was also curious about AppVoyer failure. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15708
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15708
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
**[Test build #3384 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3384/consoleFull)**
for PR 15707 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15696
Closing this in favor of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rxin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15696
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15696
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15696
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67852/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15696
**[Test build #67852 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67852/consoleFull)**
for PR 15696 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
@sethah I'm recently busy on company work. Will start to work on open
source code review soon this week.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707#discussion_r85870354
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/WriteOutput.scala
---
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ object WriteOutput extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15708
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67854/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705#discussion_r85870248
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -173,12 +175,22 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15675
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
**[Test build #3382 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3382/consoleFull)**
for PR 15673 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15708
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15675
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67851/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 572 matches
Mail list logo
