Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15729
**[Test build #67958 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67958/consoleFull)**
for PR 15729 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
For the specific failure here, it was due to not syncing the latest version
between the releases for Winodws and the others (when R 3.3.2 was released). As
we use a fixed version, R 3.3.1 now
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67946/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user jagadeesanas2 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15729
[SPARK-18133] [branch-2.0] [Examples] [ML] [Python ML Pipeline Examplâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[Fix] [branch-2.0] In Python 3, there is only one integer
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
**[Test build #67946 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67946/consoleFull)**
for PR 15677 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
**[Test build #67957 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67957/consoleFull)**
for PR 15567 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #67956 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67956/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15700
This might not handle packages the best it can on mesos but that could be a
follow-up
@sun-rui
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67950/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705
I think you don't have to since this is just the test suite.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, 8:49 PM Wenchen Fan wrote:
> *@cloud-fan* commented on this pull request.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
**[Test build #67950 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67950/consoleFull)**
for PR 15725 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86076296
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -226,6 +227,63 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
Github user jagadeesanas2 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15728
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15728
could you close this and create a PR against branch-2.0 instead of master?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86075964
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,53 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86075872
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,53 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #67955 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67955/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67955/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #67955 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67955/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15484#discussion_r86075526
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -229,10 +235,14 @@ class Analyzer(
* Group
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15484#discussion_r86075344
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -229,10 +235,14 @@ class Analyzer(
* Group
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15484#discussion_r86075252
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -216,10 +216,16 @@ class Analyzer(
* Group
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024#discussion_r86075163
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/PathOptionSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86075107
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,53 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702#discussion_r86075063
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StatefulAggregate.scala
---
@@ -104,85 +110,105 @@ case class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
@HyukjinKwon the time window when download of an older version for windows
could fail seem concerning. Is there a way to address that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
Merging in master. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15608
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86074588
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -204,6 +207,38 @@ class AstBuilder extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15608
merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67949/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
**[Test build #67949 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67949/consoleFull)**
for PR 15673 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
**[Test build #67954 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67954/consoleFull)**
for PR 15659 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86073517
--- Diff: python/setup.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86073446
--- Diff: python/setup.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86073257
--- Diff: python/pyspark/version.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86073111
--- Diff: python/pyspark/version.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
This looks to be low-ish risk given it is mostly build & script changes.
It would be great to get more python developers to review and test this out.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86072893
--- Diff: dev/run-tests.py ---
@@ -583,6 +589,7 @@ def main():
modules_with_python_tests = [m for m in test_modules if
m.python_test_goals]
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86072643
--- Diff: python/setup.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15726
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67945/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15726
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15726
**[Test build #67945 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67945/consoleFull)**
for PR 15726 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15723
**[Test build #67953 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67953/consoleFull)**
for PR 15723 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15723
**[Test build #3393 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3393/consoleFull)**
for PR 15723 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67947/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
**[Test build #67947 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67947/consoleFull)**
for PR 15671 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15724
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jagadeesanas2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15660
@yanboliang PR for branch-2.0 https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15728
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
**[Test build #67952 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67952/consoleFull)**
for PR 15711 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15693
@hvanhovell any more thoughts?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15724
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
**[Test build #3392 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3392/consoleFull)**
for PR 15711 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
@marmbrus I ended up adding test cases since they were trivial to add (and
an existing test case was asserting that text would not be supported).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15728
**[Test build #67951 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67951/consoleFull)**
for PR 15728 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024#discussion_r86070024
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -91,7 +73,8 @@ case class CreateTableLikeCommand(
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024#discussion_r86070455
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -207,6 +207,9 @@ private[spark] class HiveExternalCatalog(conf:
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024#discussion_r86069832
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -85,14 +86,7 @@ case class
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024#discussion_r86069964
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -665,15 +665,7 @@ case class AlterTableSetLocationCommand(
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024#discussion_r86070624
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -383,8 +389,22 @@ private[spark] class HiveExternalCatalog(conf:
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024#discussion_r86070959
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -513,6 +555,16 @@ private[spark] class HiveExternalCatalog(conf:
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024#discussion_r86070329
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/PathOptionSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024#discussion_r86070568
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -259,10 +266,9 @@ private[spark] class HiveExternalCatalog(conf:
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024#discussion_r86070169
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -541,3 +434,123 @@ case class DataSource(
}
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024#discussion_r86066888
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/InMemoryCatalog.scala
---
@@ -196,18 +196,32 @@ class InMemoryCatalog(
GitHub user jagadeesanas2 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15728
[SPARK-18133] [branch-2.0] [Examples] [ML] [Python ML Pipeline Example has
syntax errors]
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[Fix] [branch-2.0] In Python 3, there
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
**[Test build #67950 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67950/consoleFull)**
for PR 15725 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15668
@cloud-fan yes,It is simpler,I check the query plan, my test case
`sql("SELECTpercentile_approx(key, 0.9)" +
", count(distinct key),sum(distinct key) FROM src LIMIT 1")`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15692
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67948/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15692
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15692
**[Test build #67948 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67948/consoleFull)**
for PR 15692 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15727
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user david-weiluo-ren opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15727
[SPARK-17895] Improve doc for rangeBetween and rowsBetween
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Copied description for row and range based frame boundary from
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15703
OK, now it's ready for review and merge.
cc @yhuai @JoshRosen @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705#discussion_r86069348
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/PlanParserSuite.scala
---
@@ -180,7 +180,16 @@ class PlanParserSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
**[Test build #67949 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67949/consoleFull)**
for PR 15673 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
Rebased.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15692
**[Test build #67948 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67948/consoleFull)**
for PR 15692 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15692
that's ok. I have delete the params.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
**[Test build #67946 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67946/consoleFull)**
for PR 15677 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
**[Test build #67947 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67947/consoleFull)**
for PR 15671 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14937
A small update: I have run a few tests on a refactored version of this
patch which avoids some data copying. I have found at least one case where the
current patch is faster, but many where it is
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
Oh cool it flaked on that run
jenkins retest this please. // let's try to get a successful run for
comparison
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15669
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
Given the concerns Ofir raised about a single far future event screwing up
monotonic event time, do you want to document that problem even if there isn't
an enforced filter for it?
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15669
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67941/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15669
**[Test build #67941 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67941/consoleFull)**
for PR 15669 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702#discussion_r86066774
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -536,6 +535,41 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702#discussion_r86067616
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StatefulAggregate.scala
---
@@ -104,85 +110,105 @@ case class
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702#discussion_r86066376
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -536,6 +535,41 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702#discussion_r86066082
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -536,6 +535,41 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15675
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15675
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67942/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 740 matches
Mail list logo