Github user 1236897 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10881
@ zsxwing if I just ignore it, will it avoid my issue? my issue is I
need complete my job within 5 mins. but the issue "RpcEnv already stopped"
waste a lot of time to disconnect and make my job
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637#discussion_r86410847
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/MapAggregate.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
@jkbradley Thanks for bringing that up. I'm ok with alternate solutions
provided they don't require someone to remember to manually add or manually
except a new param, and that we can ensure that we
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
@srowen, that's a great tip about `UseStringDeduplication`; I'll give this
a try in my deployment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637#discussion_r86408951
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/MapAggregate.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743#discussion_r86410060
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
// To avoid UI
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10881
@1236897 If you don't want to build Spark, it's fine to just catch this
special exception thrown from `SparkContxt.stop` and ignore it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637#discussion_r86409288
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/MapAggregate.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637#discussion_r86409090
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/MapAggregate.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10881
> compile the code through ecplise.
No. Take a look at this page about how to build Spark:
http://spark.apache.org/docs/1.6.2/building-spark.html
> Lastly, add the output jar to
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15731
Still working on it, sorry for delay.
The listed works are:
1. Port `SparkHadoopWriter` to use commit protocol;
2. Write a new `SparkNewHadoopWriter` to write `RDD` through new Hadoop
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743#discussion_r86407389
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/UIData.scala ---
@@ -197,8 +196,32 @@ private[spark] object UIData {
shuffleWriteMetrics:
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743#discussion_r86407326
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/UIData.scala ---
@@ -197,8 +196,32 @@ private[spark] object UIData {
shuffleWriteMetrics:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13911
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13911
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68073/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13911
**[Test build #68073 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68073/consoleFull)**
for PR 13911 at commit
Github user 1236897 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10881
@zsxwing could you give the link about spark 1.6.2 of github?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743#discussion_r86406738
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
// To avoid UI
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
I don't want to truncate Param strings because it would create invalid JSON
in case people want to try to catch and parse the logs. I like the idea of
allowing exceptions and possibly adding
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15746
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15746
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68072/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15746
**[Test build #68072 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68072/consoleFull)**
for PR 15746 at commit
Github user 1236897 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10881
@zsxwing Thank you for your reply and sorry to disturb you, cos this
project is so import for me, I descrise what i need to do. Firistly, check out
the spark 1.6 from Github. Secondly, use the git
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15755
This duplicates https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15733 -- can you close
this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10881
@1236897 You can check out Spark 1.6.2 tag and apply this patch. Then build
the Spark and use this one to submit your Spark application. You can still use
the Spark maven artifact to build your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15755
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user krishnakalyan3 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15755
[SPARK-15902][PySpark] Add deprecation warning if python version below
Python 2.7
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Deprecation warning if we detect we are running in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15754
**[Test build #68074 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68074/consoleFull)**
for PR 15754 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15754
[SPARK-18200][GRAPHX][FOLLOW-UP] Support zero as an initial capacity in
OpenHashSet
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a folloup PR of #15741 in order to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13911
**[Test build #68073 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68073/consoleFull)**
for PR 13911 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68071/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #68071 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68071/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15745#discussion_r86395330
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
---
@@ -1658,4 +1658,49 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15745#discussion_r86394739
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -247,15 +247,16 @@ abstract class HashExpression[E]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68070/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #68070 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68070/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86393914
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ partitionSpec
;
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15746
**[Test build #68072 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68072/consoleFull)**
for PR 15746 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14498
@rxin Sure, will do it this weekend. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86389182
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,56 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
Sure, @hvanhovell will do it. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15590
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15741#discussion_r86388101
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/OpenHashSet.scala ---
@@ -271,8 +271,12 @@ class OpenHashSet[@specialized(Long, Int) T:
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r86381839
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -42,18 +60,43 @@ private[spark] case class AccumulatorMetadata(
* `OUT`
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15590
LGTM. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86386317
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,56 @@ case class
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r86384551
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -306,18 +428,19 @@ class LongAccumulator extends AccumulatorV2[jl.Long,
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r86384061
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -22,17 +22,36 @@ import java.io.ObjectInputStream
import
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r86383782
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ShuffledRDD.scala ---
@@ -104,10 +105,26 @@ class ShuffledRDD[K: ClassTag, V: ClassTag, C:
ClassTag](
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r84380686
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -136,15 +179,76 @@ abstract class AccumulatorV2[IN, OUT] extends
Serializable
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r86384641
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -383,16 +506,7 @@ class DoubleAccumulator extends
AccumulatorV2[jl.Double,
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86385850
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -204,6 +207,41 @@ class AstBuilder extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86385701
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,56 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86385537
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ partitionSpec
;
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Thank you, @hvanhovell . I'll revise the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15741#discussion_r86382636
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/OpenHashSet.scala ---
@@ -271,8 +271,12 @@ class OpenHashSet[@specialized(Long, Int) T:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15741#discussion_r86382197
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/OpenHashSet.scala ---
@@ -271,8 +271,12 @@ class OpenHashSet[@specialized(Long, Int) T:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15741#discussion_r86379957
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/OpenHashSet.scala ---
@@ -271,8 +271,12 @@ class OpenHashSet[@specialized(Long, Int) T:
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86377116
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,56 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86378445
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,56 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68069/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
**[Test build #68069 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68069/consoleFull)**
for PR 14995 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86376440
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -204,6 +207,41 @@ class AstBuilder extends
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9
@yinxusen Status update?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86374321
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ partitionSpec
;
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
Merging to master/2.1. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
@gatorsmile can you open a PR for 2.0 if we also need to port it to that
branch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86365769
--- Diff: python/pyspark/find_spark_home.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+#!/usr/bin/python
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
I created [SPARK-18253](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18253)
to track it. We may have to get to it after 2.1 QA period.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15746
Sure, I can make a pass tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15746
@mengxr @yanboliang Could you review this ? I'll try to take a look by end
of this week.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15628#discussion_r86360982
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Matrices.scala ---
@@ -1076,4 +1240,15 @@ object Matrices {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15692
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044#discussion_r86358423
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/RowEncoder.scala
---
@@ -119,18 +119,36 @@ object RowEncoder {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #68071 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68071/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15741#discussion_r86359753
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/OpenHashSet.scala ---
@@ -271,8 +271,12 @@ class OpenHashSet[@specialized(Long, Int) T:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15753
@advaitraut it seems mistakenly opened. We might have to close this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15692
LGTM, merged into master and branch-2.1. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044#discussion_r86358654
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ case class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044#discussion_r86358543
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/RowEncoder.scala
---
@@ -193,7 +211,8 @@ object RowEncoder {
// as
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15628#discussion_r86358529
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Matrices.scala ---
@@ -1076,4 +1240,15 @@ object Matrices {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #68070 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68070/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15750
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14937
@sethah Yeah, I agree it's better to run more test against large-scale
data. If the number of feature or cluster is large, the center array slice cost
and some other place can be optimized which
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15011
shall we backport it to 2.0? it works in spark 1.6 and earlier.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user antoniobarbuzzi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12904
I agree with @HyukjinKwon and comment
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12904#issuecomment-217605160, except for
third use case, i.e. I'd rather do this:
With the option,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
**[Test build #68069 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68069/consoleFull)**
for PR 14995 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15753
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user advaitraut opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15753
Dev advait
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15752
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15752
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68068/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15752
**[Test build #68068 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68068/consoleFull)**
for PR 15752 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432
I will rebase and clean up this tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15751
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15751
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68067/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15751
**[Test build #68067 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68067/consoleFull)**
for PR 15751 at commit
301 - 400 of 558 matches
Mail list logo
