Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
**[Test build #68513 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68513/consoleFull)**
for PR 15843 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
**[Test build #68512 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68512/consoleFull)**
for PR 15704 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68512/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
@jkbradley looks good, merged ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87549789
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -225,6 +226,102 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
**[Test build #68512 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68512/consoleFull)**
for PR 15704 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
You're right! It's another bug: copy should be implemented in JavaParams,
not JavaModel. I'm sending this PR to fix that:
https://github.com/techaddict/spark/pull/1
Can you please
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87549043
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -226,6 +227,63 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15850
**[Test build #68511 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68511/consoleFull)**
for PR 15850 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15850
[SPARK-18411] [SQL] Add Argument Types and Test Cases for String Functions
[WIP]
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add argument types and test cases into the extended
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593#discussion_r87547519
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1486,57 +1504,65 @@ private class LogisticAggregator(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15849
**[Test build #68510 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68510/consoleFull)**
for PR 15849 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15849
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68510/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15849
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15849
**[Test build #68510 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68510/consoleFull)**
for PR 15849 at commit
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15849
[SPARK-18410][STREAMING] Add structured kafka example
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR provides structured kafka wordcount examples
## How was this
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r87546426
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
---
@@ -43,11 +43,38 @@ trait ExpressionEvalHelper
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87546041
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -226,6 +227,63 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
@jkbradley yes I did it for `JavaWrapper` first, but try running tests with
it gives
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68478/consoleFull
---
If your project is
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
Thanks a lot for finding & reporting this! The fix should probably go in
JavaWrapper, not JavaModel, right?
I tested this manually (in JavaWrapper), and it seems to fix the
problematic
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68509/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
**[Test build #68509 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68509/consoleFull)**
for PR 15840 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Thank you, @viirya ! I also feel like that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15847#discussion_r87541254
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -1431,43 +1431,49 @@ case class FormatNumber(x:
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r87538921
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
---
@@ -43,11 +43,38 @@ trait
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
The changes to parsing looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15790
So one proposal I was thinking of is to just check in a built version of
the vignette in to the source tree. That way the release packaging wouldn't
need to change. The only thing to keep in mind
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68506/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706
**[Test build #68506 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68506/consoleFull)**
for PR 13706 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
@hvanhovell @kiszk I tried to use `CodegenContext.nullSafeExec()` in
`MapObjects` as an example.
If you can bear with this for now, I'll apply it to other places to
generate nullability checking
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
**[Test build #68509 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68509/consoleFull)**
for PR 15840 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68505/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706
**[Test build #68505 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68505/consoleFull)**
for PR 13706 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68507/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
**[Test build #68507 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68507/consoleFull)**
for PR 15172 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Thank you, @hvanhovell .
Now, this PR becomes much concise due to your advice.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68504/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
**[Test build #68504 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68504/consoleFull)**
for PR 15702 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Also like if there is any testing or anything I can do or coordinate to get
done that would help y'all feel comfortable with this please let me know :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68503/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
**[Test build #68503 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68503/consoleFull)**
for PR 15704 at commit
Github user mariobriggs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15742
ok. will look into that
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15820
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15820
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68508/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15820
**[Test build #68508 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68508/consoleFull)**
for PR 15820 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15847
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68502/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15847
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15847
**[Test build #68502 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68502/consoleFull)**
for PR 15847 at commit
Github user skanjila commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848
Also I really would love to avoid having to rebase yet again due to more
needed commits :) to this pull request
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user skanjila commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848
Yes to your first comment on PageViewStream, for the other one
TestSQLContext it was unfortunately missed, I'lol add that with the next pull
request which will also contain the code fixes to the
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15800#discussion_r87528327
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHash.scala ---
@@ -76,7 +72,19 @@ class MinHashModel private[ml] (
@Since("2.1.0")
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15820#discussion_r87527804
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaConsumer.scala
---
@@ -83,6 +86,129 @@ private[kafka010] case
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15820
**[Test build #68508 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68508/consoleFull)**
for PR 15820 at commit
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
cc: @jkbradley @davies @holdenk
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15817
cc: @sethah @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848
Just to be clear, from the discussion in the JIRA, it seems
`PageViewStream` example is missed intendedly here for now because changing
from `local[2]` to `local[4]` is failed for an unknown
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r87525792
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
---
@@ -43,11 +43,38 @@ trait
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r87525740
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
---
@@ -43,11 +43,38 @@ trait
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
**[Test build #68507 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68507/consoleFull)**
for PR 15172 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68499/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
**[Test build #68499 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68499/consoleFull)**
for PR 15172 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15742
It doesn't merge cleanly into branch-2.0. You can file a separate PR if you
want it fixed there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user mariobriggs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15742
@vanzin since this a regression bux in 2.0, any particular reason it is
merged only to 2.1 . I believe this should be in 2.0.2/3 as well
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706
**[Test build #68506 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68506/consoleFull)**
for PR 13706 at commit
Github user hayashidac commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15652#discussion_r87522936
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ private[ml] trait DecisionTreeParams extends
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15790
I think
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/dev/make-distribution.sh should
change too but I'm not 100% how the R package is built there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706
**[Test build #68505 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68505/consoleFull)**
for PR 13706 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15846
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15846
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68494/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15846
**[Test build #68494 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68494/consoleFull)**
for PR 15846 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706
@hvanhovell I have updated this PR. Can you take a look? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11122
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68501/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11122
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11122
**[Test build #68501 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68501/consoleFull)**
for PR 11122 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15842
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14612
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14612
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68495/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15842
Merged into master and branch-2.1. Thanks for reviewing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14612
**[Test build #68495 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68495/consoleFull)**
for PR 14612 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15814
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
**[Test build #68504 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68504/consoleFull)**
for PR 15702 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15814
Merging in master/branch-2.1. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15847#discussion_r87519874
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/mathExpressions.scala
---
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ import
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15847#discussion_r87519832
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -1431,43 +1431,49 @@ case class FormatNumber(x:
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68496/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
**[Test build #68496 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68496/consoleFull)**
for PR 15702 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
**[Test build #68503 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68503/consoleFull)**
for PR 15704 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593#discussion_r87518789
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1486,57 +1504,65 @@ private class LogisticAggregator(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
1 - 100 of 494 matches
Mail list logo
