Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16009
[SPARK-18318][ML] ML, Graph 2.1 QA: API: New Scala APIs, docs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
API review for 2.1, except ```LSH``` related classes which are still under
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69147/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
**[Test build #69147 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69147/consoleFull)**
for PR 13775 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16008
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16008
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69146/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16008
**[Test build #69146 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69146/consoleFull)**
for PR 16008 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977
**[Test build #69151 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69151/consoleFull)**
for PR 15977 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69150/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977
**[Test build #69150 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69150/consoleFull)**
for PR 15977 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977
**[Test build #69150 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69150/consoleFull)**
for PR 15977 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
**[Test build #69149 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69149/consoleFull)**
for PR 13775 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
**[Test build #69148 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69148/consoleFull)**
for PR 13775 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16003
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69145/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16003
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16003
**[Test build #69145 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69145/consoleFull)**
for PR 16003 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15992
@JoshRosen and @zsxwing waiting for your feedback.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69144/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
**[Test build #69144 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69144/consoleFull)**
for PR 14136 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16001
@srowen waiting for your feedback :D
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zhengruifeng closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15955
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15955
After offline discussion with @zhengruifeng , we think the validation in
the ```Param``` itself should be better, so other ways (which not calling
setter method) of setting params can also
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15966
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15966
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69143/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15966
**[Test build #69143 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69143/consoleFull)**
for PR 15966 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
**[Test build #69147 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69147/consoleFull)**
for PR 13775 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16008
**[Test build #69146 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69146/consoleFull)**
for PR 16008 at commit
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16008
[SPARK-18585][SQL] Use `ev.isNull = "false"` if possible for Janino to have
a chance to optimize.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Janino can optimize `true ? a : b`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16007
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16003
**[Test build #69145 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69145/consoleFull)**
for PR 16003 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16007
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69142/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16007
**[Test build #69142 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69142/consoleFull)**
for PR 16007 at commit
Github user ChorPangChan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16000#discussion_r89563670
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/status/api/v1/JacksonMessageWriter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977
Thank you for comment@rxin@srowen@gatorsmile! I'll update that later today!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
**[Test build #69144 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69144/consoleFull)**
for PR 14136 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15966
**[Test build #69143 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69143/consoleFull)**
for PR 15966 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15966#discussion_r89561319
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -35,11 +35,12 @@ class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15966#discussion_r89560765
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -35,11 +35,12 @@ class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15966#discussion_r89560594
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -35,11 +35,12 @@ class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15966#discussion_r89560507
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -35,11 +35,12 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16007
**[Test build #69142 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69142/consoleFull)**
for PR 16007 at commit
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16007
[SPARK-18583][SQL] Fix nullability of InputFileName.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The nullability of `InputFileName` should be `false`.
## How was this patch
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15955
After offline discussion with @yanboliang , I will update this PR to make
solvers more private and include MLPC in this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user tanxinz closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16004
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15955
@yanboliang I add the `private[regression]` limitation refering to
`MultilayerPerceptronClassifier` implementation:
Github user ChorPangChan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16000#discussion_r89558292
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/status/api/v1/JacksonMessageWriter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user witgo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
Thanks, I am glad to hear this, and I want to solve the issues of reading,
storing and transmitting data as much as possible.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15916
Hello @rxin @hvanhovell Can you let me know if this is needed or not? So I
can close it. Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15970
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15970
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69141/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15970
**[Test build #69141 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69141/consoleFull)**
for PR 15970 at commit
Github user kxepal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15961
@holdenk @srowen
Added a warning message, please take a second look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15966#discussion_r89554371
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -35,11 +35,12 @@ class
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15966
LGTM other than that one change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15970
**[Test build #69141 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69141/consoleFull)**
for PR 15970 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15462
@andrewor14 thank you for your review. Could you please see it again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15358#discussion_r89547862
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ddl.scala ---
@@ -56,6 +56,14 @@ case class CreateTempViewUsing(
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15358#discussion_r89547695
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -766,4 +766,5 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15358#discussion_r89547692
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -52,12 +52,10 @@ case class CatalogStorageFormat(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15358
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15358
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69140/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15358
**[Test build #69140 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69140/consoleFull)**
for PR 15358 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16004
Hmmm. Seems that you have opened against the wrong branch. Could you close,
open against the correct branch, and add the JIRA ticket and the Spark
component to the title (look at every other
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16001
Not sure this is worth a whole commit, but it is probably good to fix. LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69139/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975
**[Test build #69139 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69139/consoleFull)**
for PR 15975 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15462
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69138/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15462
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15462
**[Test build #69138 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69138/consoleFull)**
for PR 15462 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16005
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16005
Hmmm. I cannot merge to 2.0 :(... Can you open a backport against 2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16005
LGTM. Merging to master/2.1/2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977
Also use NonFoldableLiteral to do the test. Make sure you create a null
nonfoldable literal to verify the result is null.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977
How about adding the following two lines into the test case in
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977#discussion_r89540400
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -120,7 +120,9 @@ object JDBCRDD extends Logging {
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913
One more thing: This breaks several public APIs, although in mostly minor
ways and with good reasons. Could you please update the JIRA to list the
public API changes?
---
If your project is
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913#discussion_r89537340
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -547,21 +547,6 @@ trait Params extends Identifiable with Serializable {
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913#discussion_r89537785
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -443,12 +429,11 @@ private[ml] trait GBTParams extends
TreeEnsembleParams
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913#discussion_r89537864
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -317,8 +317,32 @@ private[ml] trait TreeEnsembleParams extends
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15913#discussion_r89537771
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -443,12 +425,11 @@ private[ml] trait GBTParams extends
TreeEnsembleParams
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16005
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16005
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69137/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16005
**[Test build #69137 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69137/consoleFull)**
for PR 16005 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977
I believe the correct replacement for "x in ()" is "if (isnull(x)) null
else false"
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15358
**[Test build #69140 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69140/consoleFull)**
for PR 15358 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975
**[Test build #69139 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69139/consoleFull)**
for PR 15975 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15358
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16005
@hvanhovell I will work on the whitelist in a new JIRA under SPARK-18455.
It will be my top priority task and I hope we can merge it in the next minor
release of 2.0.x. Let's have this PR scoped for
Github user opme commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
@witgo I have a Pyspark application that was failing in 3 different places
but is able to run without errors now. I'm glad for this patch as I am not
sure how I would have explained to my professors
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16005
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69135/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16005
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16005
**[Test build #69135 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69135/consoleFull)**
for PR 16005 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15462
**[Test build #69138 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69138/consoleFull)**
for PR 15462 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15462#discussion_r89535856
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryColumnarQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -20,18 +20,83 @@ package
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15462#discussion_r89535786
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryColumnarQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -20,18 +20,83 @@ package
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
