Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16134
is this PR related to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979
```
val x: Dataset[String, Option[(String, String)]] = ...
x.groupByKey(_._1).mapValues(_._2).agg(someAgg)
```
Does it work before?
Please see the discussion in the JIRA:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user koertkuipers commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979
this means anything that uses an encoder can no longer use Option[_ <:
Product].
encoders are not just used for the top level Dataset creation.
Dataset.groupByKey[K] requires an
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
**[Test build #69634 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69634/consoleFull)**
for PR 16135 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69634/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15683#discussion_r90771932
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -88,6 +89,12 @@ class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16133#discussion_r90771895
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/NewHadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -132,54 +132,57 @@ class NewHadoopRDD[K, V](
override def
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
**[Test build #69634 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69634/consoleFull)**
for PR 16135 at commit
GitHub user xuanyuanking opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
SPARK-18700: add ReadWriteLock for each table's relation in cache
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As the scenario describe in
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16131
Jenkins, add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16134
**[Test build #69633 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69633/consoleFull)**
for PR 16134 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16104#discussion_r90771606
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -121,21 +121,61 @@ case class
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16134
[SPARK-18703] [SQL] Drop Staging Directories and Data Files After each
Insertion/CTAS of Hive serde Tables
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Below are the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16133
**[Test build #69632 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69632/consoleFull)**
for PR 16133 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16133
cc @ueshin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16133
[SPARK-18702][SQL] input_file_block_start and input_file_block_length
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We currently have function input_file_name to get the path of the input
Github user koertkuipers commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979#discussion_r90770855
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/ExpressionEncoder.scala
---
@@ -47,16 +47,26 @@ object ExpressionEncoder
Github user koertkuipers commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979#discussion_r90770824
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/ExpressionEncoder.scala
---
@@ -47,16 +47,26 @@ object ExpressionEncoder
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16132
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16132
Merging in master. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16132
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user linbojin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16132
[MINOR] [README] Correct Markdown link inside readme
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
"Useful Developer Tools" link inside
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16131
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user actuaryzhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16131
[SPARK-18701][ML] Poisson GLM fails due to wrong initialization
Poisson GLM fails for many standard data sets (see example in test or
JIRA). The issue is incorrect initialization leading to
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
@rxin
Could you give me any advice for this issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480#discussion_r90769457
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala
---
@@ -118,7 +118,42 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69631/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
**[Test build #69631 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69631/consoleFull)**
for PR 16122 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16090
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16090
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69630/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16090
**[Test build #69630 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69630/consoleFull)**
for PR 16090 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
**[Test build #69631 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69631/consoleFull)**
for PR 16122 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15795
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15795
LGTM
merging with master and branch-2.1
Thanks all!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69629/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
**[Test build #69629 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69629/consoleFull)**
for PR 16122 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16090
**[Test build #69630 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69630/consoleFull)**
for PR 16090 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16090
Not sure I follow - could you explain more on why that would resolve the
issue?
Btw, I reverted this pr to b405635, which passes all tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
**[Test build #69629 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69629/consoleFull)**
for PR 16122 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16125#discussion_r90767030
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQueryException.scala
---
@@ -24,32 +24,42 @@ import
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15813#discussion_r90766854
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -173,51 +179,37 @@ class CSVFileFormat extends
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15813#discussion_r90766169
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -173,51 +179,37 @@ class CSVFileFormat
Github user koertkuipers commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15918
It can be done with shapeless (which perhaps uses macros under hood, I
don't know).
On Dec 1, 2016 19:56, "Michael Armbrust" wrote:
I don't think
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103#discussion_r90765451
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/stopwords/english.txt ---
@@ -149,5 +149,58 @@ shan
shouldn
wasn
weren
-won
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69628/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
**[Test build #69628 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69628/consoleFull)**
for PR 16130 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16094#discussion_r90764328
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/column.py ---
@@ -298,19 +299,34 @@ def isin(self, *cols):
isNotNull = _unary_op("isNotNull", "True if the current
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16121
I was hesistant with the previous PR since it seemed like we didn't fully
understand why we were changing what we were at the time, I can try and take a
closer look at this over the next few days
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
Since the current tests pass without this change I'd say that we should add
a test for the behaviour we are planning to support that isn't currently
supported (would also make the purpose of the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
**[Test build #69628 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69628/consoleFull)**
for PR 16130 at commit
Github user nchammas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
cc @vanzin?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user nchammas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
Update location of Spark YARN shuffle jar
Looking at the distributions provided on spark.apache.org, I see that the
Spark YARN shuffle jar is under `yarn/` and not `lib/`.
You can merge this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
@felixcheung maybe you can advise me on this. I think this is a correct
fix, but ends up changing the results of decision forests a little bit. The
SparkR test you wrote fails:
```
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046
Merging to master/2.1/2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
**[Test build #3467 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3467/consoleFull)**
for PR 16129 at commit
Github user zhzhan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068#discussion_r90763121
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveUDFSuite.scala
---
@@ -487,6 +488,29 @@ class HiveUDFSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user zhzhan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
@gatorsmile we cannot use deterministic = true/false, as there are
existing udf with deterministic as true, but stateful as true as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/FunctionRegistry.java#L1373-L1378
Copied the code from Hive `FunctionRegistry.java`:
```JAVA
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
Found the link: [HIVE-1994: Support new annotation @UDFType(stateful =
true)](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1994 )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
Could we directly use `@UDFType(deterministic = true/false)`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zhzhan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
My understanding is that the non-deterministic udf does not need to be
stageful, but a stateful udf has to be non-deterministic.
Here is the comments in hive regarding this property
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
**[Test build #3467 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3467/consoleFull)**
for PR 16129 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69625/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
**[Test build #69625 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69625/consoleFull)**
for PR 16122 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69627/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69627 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69627/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
**[Test build #3466 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3466/consoleFull)**
for PR 16129 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16090
If we are going to hack it, how about this?
```
val dataSource = DataSource(...)
if (classOf[FileFormat].isAssignableFrom(dataSource.providingClass)) {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69627 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69627/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r90758322
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,27 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69626 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69626/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69626/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15995
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69623/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15995
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69626 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69626/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15995
**[Test build #69623 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69623/consoleFull)**
for PR 15995 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r90758182
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,27 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
**[Test build #69625 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69625/consoleFull)**
for PR 16122 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69624 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69624/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69624/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69624 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69624/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
This patch fails because hive-0.12 and hive-0.13 doesn't has `getMetaConf`
method.
see [HIVE-7532](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-7532),
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043#discussion_r90757729
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/ComplexTypes.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69621/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
**[Test build #69621 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69621/consoleFull)**
for PR 16030 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69622/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
**[Test build #69622 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69622/consoleFull)**
for PR 16122 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo