Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16345
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70584/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70584 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70584/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16345
Thanks. Merging to master. This seems risky to backport to other branches.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16402
**[Test build #70585 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70585/testReport)**
for PR 16402 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16402
cc @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16402
[SPARK-18999][SQL][minor] simplify Literal codegen
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Literal` can use `CodegenContex.addReferenceObj` to implement codegen,
instead of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70584 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70584/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93847467
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -133,49 +209,26 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664#discussion_r93847101
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -112,7 +112,25 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664#discussion_r93846787
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -112,7 +112,25 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16399 has been merged, feel free if
you wanna backport to 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70578/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70578 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70578/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16399
thanks, merging to 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16401#discussion_r93846292
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -642,6 +642,13 @@ object SQLConf {
.doubleConf
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16383
**[Test build #70583 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70583/testReport)**
for PR 16383 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16383
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16388
**[Test build #70581 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70581/testReport)**
for PR 16388 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #70582 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70582/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16401
cc @rxin @cloud-fan @viirya
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16391#discussion_r93844973
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -170,36 +176,39 @@ object DatasetBenchmark {
val benchmark3
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664#discussion_r93844970
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -112,7 +112,25 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16401
**[Test build #70580 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70580/testReport)**
for PR 16401 at commit
GitHub user wzhfy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16401
[SPARK-18998] [SQL] Add a cbo conf to switch between default statistics and
estimated statistics
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We add a cbo configuration to switch
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93844718
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -133,49 +209,26 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93844582
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +57,108 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93844573
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +57,108 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93844552
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +57,107 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9759
@srowen @rxin @zsxwing The Option json serialization issue
(https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-module-scala/issues/240) looks like fixed
now. Do you think it is ok I try to upgrade Jackson now?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70579/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400
**[Test build #70579 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70579/testReport)**
for PR 16400 at commit
Github user alokob commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355
@imatiach-msft Did you find the dataset suitable. Is anything else needed
from my side?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user debasish83 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14473
ADMM is already available as a breeze solver (BFGS, OWLQN,
NonlinearMinimizer) which is integrated with ml/mllib...It will be great if you
can look into it and let me know if you need pointers
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400
**[Test build #70579 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70579/testReport)**
for PR 16400 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400
[SPARK-18941][SQL][DOC] Add a new behavior document on `CREATE/DROP TABLE`
with `LOCATION`
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a new behavior change
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
@davies It is true that pushing down different predicates results in
different CTE logical/physical plans. I spend some LOC changes in this to
address that cases, i.e., preparing a disjunctive
Github user debasish83 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12574
Can we close it ? Looks like SPARK-18235 opened up recommendForAll
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user debasish83 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12574
test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70577/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
**[Test build #70577 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70577/testReport)**
for PR 15664 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70576/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
**[Test build #70576 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70576/testReport)**
for PR 16320 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16255#discussion_r93841751
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ object RemoveAliasOnlyProject
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70578 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70578/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93841229
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +57,107 @@ case class
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93841112
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +57,107 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
LGTM except for few minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93839843
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +57,107 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93839797
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +57,107 @@ case class
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93839767
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +57,107 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93839620
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +57,107 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93839535
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +57,107 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93839460
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +57,107 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93839456
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +57,107 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16399#discussion_r93838816
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -55,7 +55,10 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16399
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70575/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16399
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16399
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16399
**[Test build #70575 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70575/consoleFull)**
for PR 16399 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
**[Test build #70577 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70577/testReport)**
for PR 15664 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
**[Test build #70576 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70576/testReport)**
for PR 16320 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16370
@zsxwing Is there any farther feedbackï¼
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16399
**[Test build #70575 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70575/consoleFull)**
for PR 16399 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
I think that it is good time to close this when #13909 is closed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16399
[SPARK-18237][SPARK-18703] [SPARK-18675] [SQL] [BACKPORT-2.1] CTAS for hive
serde table should work for all hive versions AND Drop Staging Directories and
Data Files
### What changes were
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16309
For reference: [scala-xml
releases](https://github.com/scala/scala-xml/releases)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16388#discussion_r93832614
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -408,8 +408,8 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
I'm working on the last option approach, I hope I could finish that in one
or two more days.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70574/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
**[Test build #70574 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70574/testReport)**
for PR 15730 at commit
Github user zhaorongsheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16389
@mridulm Please check it. Thanks~
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16398
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16398
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70573/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16398
**[Test build #70573 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70573/testReport)**
for PR 16398 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
**[Test build #70574 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70574/testReport)**
for PR 15730 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16397
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70572/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16397
**[Test build #70572 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70572/testReport)**
for PR 16397 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16397
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16397#discussion_r93829600
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveCommandSuite.scala
---
@@ -221,7 +223,7 @@ class HiveCommandSuite extends
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16397#discussion_r93829539
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveCommandSuite.scala
---
@@ -221,7 +223,7 @@ class HiveCommandSuite extends
Github user philipphoffmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14936
will do ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16397
Note to myself, there should be more but I could not identify them all
although I believe these are almost all, because some errors are suppressed and
there are still many test failures
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16398
cc @srowen, this is a similar problem in the last PR in this JIRA, which
make the test hanging. I think this is the last one. Could I please ask to take
a look?
---
If your project is set up
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16398
Build started: [TESTS] `org.apache.spark.repl.ReplSuite`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16398
**[Test build #70573 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70573/testReport)**
for PR 16398 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16398
[SPARK-18842][TESTS] De-duplicate paths in classpaths in processes for
local-cluster mode in ReplSuite to work around the length limitation on Windows
## What changes were proposed in this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16397
Build started: [TESTS] `ALL`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16397
**[Test build #70572 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70572/testReport)**
for PR 16397 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16397
[WIP][SPARK-18922][TESTS] Fix more path-related test failures on Windows
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to fix the test failures due to different
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16388#discussion_r93827087
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -408,8 +408,8 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16391#discussion_r93826236
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -170,36 +176,39 @@ object DatasetBenchmark {
val benchmark3 =
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
Hive does not allow to use a CTAS statement to create a partitioned table,
but we allow it in the Create Data Source table syntax.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
`CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE` is not supported for all the types of hive serde
tables. However, in `CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE` is allowed for creating data souce
tables if `AS query` is not specified.
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
