Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16486
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16484#discussion_r94910539
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/Worker.scala
---
@@ -445,12 +445,24 @@ private[deploy] class Worker(
// Create
GitHub user leonfl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16486
[SPARK-13610][ML] Create a Transformer to disassemble vectors in Dataâ¦
JIRA Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13610
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70966/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
**[Test build #70966 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70966/testReport)**
for PR 14451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70965/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
**[Test build #70965 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70965/testReport)**
for PR 14451 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430#discussion_r94909141
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/ProjectEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16485
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user 351zyf opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16485
[SPARK-19099] correct the wrong time display in history server web UI
JIRA Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19099
Correct the wrong job start/end time display in spark
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16484
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16480
**[Test build #70972 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70972/testReport)**
for PR 16480 at commit
GitHub user zuotingbing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16484
Sh
JIRA Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19083#
sbin/start-history-server.sh script use of $@ without quotes, this will
affect the length of args which used in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70969/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483
**[Test build #70969 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70969/testReport)**
for PR 16483 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16479
**[Test build #70971 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70971/testReport)**
for PR 16479 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16480
**[Test build #70970 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70970/testReport)**
for PR 16480 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16480
LGTM pending Jenkins tests
Thanks @sueann !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16480
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16480
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16479#discussion_r94907874
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/source/libsvm/LibSVMRelation.scala ---
@@ -45,9 +45,12 @@ private[libsvm] class LibSVMOutputWriter(
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16240
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16240
@michalsenkyr please create 2 more tickets for the optimization you
metioned in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16240#issuecomment-266318016
and the nested custom collection problem.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16240
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
Thanks for review! I'll fix it today
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user merlintang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819#discussion_r94906952
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -216,5 +219,37 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430#discussion_r94906707
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/ProjectEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483
**[Test build #70969 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70969/testReport)**
for PR 16483 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16431#discussion_r94906692
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/AggregateEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429
Yah I think the third party library is definitly a follow up type task, but
something we should consider after this since we are back porting fixes from
another repo into our own code :)
---
If
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r94906528
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,479 @@
+/*
+ *
GitHub user aray opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483
[SPARK-18847][GraphX] PageRank gives incorrect results for graphs with sinks
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Graphs with sinks (vertices with no outgoing edges) don't have
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r94906278
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,479 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r94906270
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,479 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r94906266
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,479 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r94906221
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,479 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r94906180
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/Range.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429
BTW, this at least makes Spark on working state in Python 3.6.0 with a
minimised changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r94906142
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/Range.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429
@holdenk, Yup. (actually, it is cloudpipe/cloudpickle@cbd3f34 because there
were more minor fixes). It seems there are several customized codes such as
injecting `numpy` as below:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r94905939
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,479 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r94905864
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,479 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r94905897
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,479 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r94905771
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/estimation/FilterEstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70961/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
**[Test build #70961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70961/testReport)**
for PR 14451 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429
(We might want to consider using cloudpickle as a library since others are
working on maintaining it and they had a fix for 3.6 support back in early
November, but that would involve adding another
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429
Am I correct in assuming this is based on
https://github.com/cloudpipe/cloudpickle/commit/4945361c2db92095f934b92a6c00316243caf3cc
?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464#discussion_r94905455
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/LDAWrapper.scala ---
@@ -172,6 +187,8 @@ private[r] object LDAWrapper extends
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430#discussion_r94905442
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/estimation/EstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16401
How about the following?
```
def stats(conf: CatalystConf): Statistics = statsCache.getOrElse {
invalidateStatsCache()
statsCache = Some(computeStats(conf))
statsCache.get
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464#discussion_r94905327
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib.R ---
@@ -907,6 +917,8 @@ test_that("spark.lda with text input", {
expect_equal(logPerplexity,
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464#discussion_r94905196
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/LDAWrapper.scala ---
@@ -123,6 +126,10 @@ private[r] object LDAWrapper extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
**[Test build #70968 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70968/testReport)**
for PR 13599 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454#discussion_r94905140
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -214,8 +214,14 @@ def __init__(self, sparkContext, jsparkSession=None):
self._wrapped =
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16401
do you mean no cache for `def statistics(conf)`:
```
def statistics(conf: CatalystConf): Statistics = {
if(conf.cboEnabled) newStats else oldStats
}
lazy val newStats...
lazy
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16482
I think there's no issue in yarn side, please check the yarn container's
local cache:
```
-rw--- 1 spark hadoop 200 Jan 6 05:59 container_tokens
-rwx-- 1 spark hadoop
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454#discussion_r94904472
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -214,8 +214,14 @@ def __init__(self, sparkContext, jsparkSession=None):
self._wrapped =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70958/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257
**[Test build #70958 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70958/testReport)**
for PR 12257 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16441
It looks like I am failing the binary compatibility tests despite this
constructor being private:
class GBTClassificationModel private[ml](
@Since("1.6.0") override val uid:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16478
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70951/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16478
**[Test build #70951 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70951/testReport)**
for PR 16478 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16478
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
**[Test build #70967 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70967/testReport)**
for PR 14451 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
**[Test build #70966 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70966/testReport)**
for PR 14451 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454#discussion_r94903491
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -214,8 +214,14 @@ def __init__(self, sparkContext, jsparkSession=None):
self._wrapped =
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451#discussion_r94903467
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -536,10 +539,17 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
**[Test build #70965 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70965/testReport)**
for PR 14451 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451#discussion_r94903385
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -536,10 +539,17 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user vijoshi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454#discussion_r94903274
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -214,8 +214,14 @@ def __init__(self, sparkContext, jsparkSession=None):
self._wrapped =
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430#discussion_r94903216
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/estimation/EstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451#discussion_r94903231
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -536,10 +539,17 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430#discussion_r94903188
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/estimation/EstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16401
@wzhfy I thought about this more. Why don't we just get rid of the existing
"def statistics", and keep only one function
```
def statistics(conf: CatalystConf): Statistics
```
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9920
@jliwork @srowen are you currently working on this in-progress JIRA 11569?
If not, I would be interested in continuing the initial pull request that was
closed. Please let me know, thank
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819#discussion_r94902388
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -216,5 +219,37 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430#discussion_r94902185
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/ProjectEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
**[Test build #70964 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70964/consoleFull)**
for PR 15819 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70964/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430#discussion_r94902161
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/ProjectEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
Yeap. Then, let me add a test case and fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430#discussion_r94902084
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/EstimationUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430#discussion_r94902048
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/estimation/EstimationUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16441#discussion_r94902030
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/GBTClassifier.scala ---
@@ -248,12 +269,38 @@ class GBTClassificationModel private[ml](
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
**[Test build #70964 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70964/consoleFull)**
for PR 15819 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16441#discussion_r94901794
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/GBTClassifier.scala ---
@@ -248,12 +269,38 @@ class GBTClassificationModel private[ml](
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430#discussion_r94901694
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/estimation/EstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16482
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user parente opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16482
[SPARK-19038][YARN] Fix for misnamed keytab in app staging dir
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Bug fix to respect the generate AM keytab name when copying the local
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
That assumes `JDBCRelation` does not extend `SchemaRelationProvider`. Yeah.
That is right so far, but we do not know whether this might be changed.
Normally, the best way is to add a test case
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
Sure, I will add. It seems `format("jdbc").load()` thorws an exception
already which is being tested
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16481
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70956/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 540 matches
Mail list logo
