Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95054651
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +341,91 @@ object CaseKeyWhen
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95054605
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ConditionalExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -137,4 +139,48 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95054575
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ConditionalExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -137,4 +139,48 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95054547
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +341,91 @@ object CaseKeyWhen
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95054508
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +341,91 @@ object CaseKeyWhen
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95054387
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +341,91 @@ object CaseKeyWhen
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
**[Test build #71006 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71006/testReport)**
for PR 16493 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71005/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
**[Test build #71005 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71005/testReport)**
for PR 16493 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400#discussion_r95053274
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1362,6 +1362,13 @@ options.
- Dataset and DataFrame API `explode` has been deprecated,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400#discussion_r95053222
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1362,6 +1362,13 @@ options.
- Dataset and DataFrame API `explode` has been deprecated,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71004/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
**[Test build #71004 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71004/testReport)**
for PR 16493 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16488
Yeah I think it does get automatically updated during the release but its
good to keep this in sync this just for the development builds etc.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
**[Test build #71005 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71005/testReport)**
for PR 16493 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16344
@srowen @yanboliang
I'm closing this PR since it does not seem to be very clean to integrate
into the current GLM setup. I appreciate all the comments and discussions.
---
If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400#discussion_r95052715
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1362,6 +1362,13 @@ options.
- Dataset and DataFrame API `explode` has been deprecated,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400#discussion_r95052705
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1362,6 +1362,13 @@ options.
- Dataset and DataFrame API `explode` has been deprecated,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400#discussion_r95052691
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1362,6 +1362,13 @@ options.
- Dataset and DataFrame API `explode` has been deprecated,
Github user actuaryzhang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16344
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400#discussion_r95052654
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1362,6 +1362,13 @@ options.
- Dataset and DataFrame API `explode` has been deprecated,
Github user witgo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
@kayousterhout
Okay, I'll do the code revision this weekend.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zuotingbing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16439#discussion_r95052089
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/Worker.scala
---
@@ -445,12 +445,24 @@ private[deploy] class Worker(
//
Github user zuotingbing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16439#discussion_r95052088
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/Worker.scala
---
@@ -445,12 +445,24 @@ private[deploy] class Worker(
//
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493#discussion_r95052038
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -565,4 +567,82 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493#discussion_r95051560
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -565,4 +577,67 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16495
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493#discussion_r95051550
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -565,4 +577,67 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16495
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71003/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16495
**[Test build #71003 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71003/testReport)**
for PR 16495 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493#discussion_r95051546
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -565,4 +567,82 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
**[Test build #71004 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71004/testReport)**
for PR 16493 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493#discussion_r95051398
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -131,6 +132,12 @@ class CacheManager extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15119
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71001/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15119
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15119
**[Test build #71001 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71001/testReport)**
for PR 15119 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493#discussion_r95050805
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -131,6 +132,12 @@ class CacheManager extends Logging {
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493#discussion_r95050799
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -565,4 +567,82 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493#discussion_r95050745
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -131,6 +132,12 @@ class CacheManager extends Logging {
Github user 351zyf commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16485
But the time display on history server web UI is not correct. It is 8 hours
eralier than the actual time here.
Am I using the wrong configuration ?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493#discussion_r95050711
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -565,4 +567,82 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493#discussion_r95050708
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -565,4 +567,82 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
In the test suite, we can have such a helper function to count
`InMemoryRelation`
```Scala
private def getNumInMemoryRelations(plan: LogicalPlan): Int = {
var sum = plan.collect
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16480
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
OK, I'll just wait so @sethah can make a final pass and so @yanboliang can
merge the 2 tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454#discussion_r95050517
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -1886,6 +1887,28 @@ def test_hivecontext(self):
self.assertTrue(os.path.exists(metastore_path))
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16480
Merging with master.
Not backporting unless people request it since this memory leak is very
minor.
Thanks @sueann !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16495
**[Test build #71003 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71003/testReport)**
for PR 16495 at commit
GitHub user mhmoudr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16495
SPARK-16920: Add a stress test for evaluateEachIteration for 2000 trees
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Just adding a test to prove error by tree is working for 2000
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70999/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
**[Test build #70999 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70999/testReport)**
for PR 16493 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16492
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16492
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70998/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16492
**[Test build #70998 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70998/testReport)**
for PR 16492 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70997/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
**[Test build #70997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70997/testReport)**
for PR 16138 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493#discussion_r95049506
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -565,4 +567,82 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493#discussion_r95049495
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -565,4 +567,82 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
@dilipbiswal Could you post the nested subquery in the PR description? It
can help the other reviewers understand the fix. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16494
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16494
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71002/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
Although the test cases can be improved, the code fix looks good to me. cc
@JoshRosen @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16494
**[Test build #71002 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71002/testReport)**
for PR 16494 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16387#discussion_r95048733
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/ExternalAppendOnlyMap.scala
---
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ class ExternalAppendOnlyMap[K, V, C](
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430#discussion_r95048331
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/statsEstimation/ProjectEstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user merlintang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user merlintang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
Many thanks, Xiao. I learnt lots.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
@merlintang Can you close this PR? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
Thanks! Merging to 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16492
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16492
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70995/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16492
**[Test build #70995 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70995/testReport)**
for PR 16492 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16494
@jkbradley @vanzin @skyluc @luluorta @uncleGen @kanzhang Could you please
take a look at this pull request to fix the method fromEdges in EdgeRDD class
used by LDA? Thank you!
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16480
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16491#discussion_r95047025
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDASuite.scala ---
@@ -260,6 +260,14 @@ class LDASuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16480
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70996/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16480
**[Test build #70996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70996/testReport)**
for PR 16480 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16494
**[Test build #71002 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71002/testReport)**
for PR 16494 at commit
GitHub user imatiach-msft opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16494
[SPARK-17975][MLLIB] Fix EMLDAOptimizer failing with ClassCastException
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
LDA fails with a ClassCastException when run on a dataset
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15119
@vanzin and @themodernlife , I have this fixed up to use the additional
repositories when loading ivy settings from a file. Added a new test for
loading a settings and fixed up the docs for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16473
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16473
**[Test build #71000 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71000/testReport)**
for PR 16473 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16473
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71000/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16491#discussion_r95045854
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDASuite.scala ---
@@ -260,6 +260,14 @@ class LDASuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15119
**[Test build #71001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71001/testReport)**
for PR 15119 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
**[Test build #70999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70999/testReport)**
for PR 16493 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16473
**[Test build #71000 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71000/testReport)**
for PR 16473 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16473
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user dilipbiswal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
[SPARK-19093][SQL] Cached tables are not used in SubqueryExpression
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Consider the plans inside subquery expressions while looking up cache
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16387#discussion_r95044381
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/ExternalAppendOnlyMap.scala
---
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ class ExternalAppendOnlyMap[K, V, C](
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16492
**[Test build #70998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70998/testReport)**
for PR 16492 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16443#discussion_r95044096
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -34,12 +34,14 @@ import org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkHadoopUtil
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
**[Test build #70997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70997/testReport)**
for PR 16138 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16480
**[Test build #70996 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70996/testReport)**
for PR 16480 at commit
1 - 100 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
