Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16603#discussion_r96581689
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/memory/TaskMemoryManager.java
---
@@ -144,8 +164,24 @@ public long acquireExecutionMemory(long required,
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16613#discussion_r96580856
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/views.scala ---
@@ -275,21 +286,80 @@ case class AlterViewAsCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
**[Test build #71580 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71580/testReport)**
for PR 16606 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16613#discussion_r96580761
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/views.scala ---
@@ -207,29 +210,35 @@ case class CreateViewCommand(
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16613#discussion_r96580350
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/views.scala ---
@@ -275,21 +286,80 @@ case class AlterViewAsCommand(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16613#discussion_r96580275
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/views.scala ---
@@ -207,29 +210,35 @@ case class CreateViewCommand(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16613
**[Test build #71579 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71579/testReport)**
for PR 16613 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621
After merging https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16517, it introduces a
few conflicts.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16517
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16517
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16624
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71571/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16624
**[Test build #71571 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71571/testReport)**
for PR 16624 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16624
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user paragpc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
I am not sure why the build is failing with following error,
stderr: fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/apache/spark.git/':
Failed connect to github.com:443; Operation now in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71578/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16517
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71569/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16517
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16517
**[Test build #71569 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71569/testReport)**
for PR 16517 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16630
The following code illustrates the idea of this PR.
```
val datasetWithWeight = Seq(
(1.0, 1.0, 0.0, 5.0),
(0.5, 2.0, 1.0, 2.0),
(1.0, 3.0, 2.0, 1.0),
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71577/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16630
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71570/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
**[Test build #71570 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71570/testReport)**
for PR 16605 at commit
GitHub user actuaryzhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16630
[SPARK-19270][ML] Add summary table to GLM summary
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add R-like summary table to GLM summary, which includes feature name (if
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621#discussion_r96577649
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -215,37 +215,43 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16585
LGTM, pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621#discussion_r96577543
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreDataSourcesSuite.scala
---
@@ -1322,4 +1322,26 @@ class MetastoreDataSourcesSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621#discussion_r96577471
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
---
@@ -1626,17 +1626,6 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621#discussion_r96577427
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -215,37 +215,43 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71568/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
**[Test build #71568 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71568/testReport)**
for PR 16605 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621#discussion_r96576872
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -586,12 +594,12 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621
**[Test build #71576 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71576/testReport)**
for PR 16621 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16517
No concern after the latest changes. LGTM pending Jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621
No more comments. It looks pretty good! Let us see whether all the test
cases can pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621#discussion_r96575899
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1799,6 +1799,7 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621#discussion_r96575520
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -586,12 +594,12 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621
**[Test build #71574 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71574/testReport)**
for PR 16621 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16585
**[Test build #71575 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71575/testReport)**
for PR 16585 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16585#discussion_r96574565
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -435,6 +435,31 @@ def test_udf_with_input_file_name(self):
row =
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16585#discussion_r96574569
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -435,6 +435,31 @@ def test_udf_with_input_file_name(self):
row =
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
**[Test build #71573 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71573/testReport)**
for PR 12064 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621
**[Test build #71572 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71572/testReport)**
for PR 16621 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16603#discussion_r96574267
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/memory/TaskMemoryManager.java
---
@@ -144,23 +170,31 @@ public long acquireExecutionMemory(long required,
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16576#discussion_r96573963
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1539,6 +1539,9 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
// NOTE: we use a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71567/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16603#discussion_r96572902
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/memory/TaskMemoryManager.java
---
@@ -144,23 +170,31 @@ public long acquireExecutionMemory(long required,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621
Sure. No problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621
can we do it later? We are going to merge `CatalogRelation` implementations
and unify the table relation representations soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621
**[Test build #71567 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71567/testReport)**
for PR 16621 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16585#discussion_r96572553
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -435,6 +435,31 @@ def test_udf_with_input_file_name(self):
row =
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16585#discussion_r96572514
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -435,6 +435,31 @@ def test_udf_with_input_file_name(self):
row =
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621
Could we rename `SimpleCatalogRelation` to `UnresolvedCatalogRelation`? The
current name looks very confusing to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621#discussion_r96572359
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -215,37 +215,44 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71564/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
**[Test build #71564 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71564/testReport)**
for PR 13599 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16624
**[Test build #71571 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71571/testReport)**
for PR 16624 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71566/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621#discussion_r96571473
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -650,14 +659,21 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
**[Test build #71566 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71566/testReport)**
for PR 12064 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16547
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71565/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16547
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16585
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71561/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16547
**[Test build #71565 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71565/testReport)**
for PR 16547 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16585
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16585
**[Test build #71561 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71561/testReport)**
for PR 16585 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16609
@emlyn I'm not sure this should be associated with RDD, since we are
working with DataFrame here?
As for the existing `name` methods in RDD.R - they are not public APIs
---
If your project
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16621#discussion_r96570432
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -215,37 +215,44 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606#discussion_r96569991
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/PartitionedWriteSuite.scala
---
@@ -92,6 +92,30 @@ class PartitionedWriteSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606#discussion_r96569809
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1374,4 +1377,47 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16623
merged to 2.1. thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606#discussion_r96569387
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1374,4 +1377,47 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606#discussion_r96569222
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1374,4 +1377,47 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606#discussion_r96569205
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1374,4 +1377,47 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16623
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606#discussion_r96569171
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ case class
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16589#discussion_r96569089
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/install.R ---
@@ -201,14 +221,20 @@ directDownloadTar <- function(mirrorUrl, version,
hadoopVersion, packageName, pa
msg <-
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
@vanzin
Sorry for the stupid mistake I made. I've changed. Please take another look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16589#discussion_r96567761
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/install.R ---
@@ -201,14 +221,20 @@ directDownloadTar <- function(mirrorUrl, version,
hadoopVersion, packageName, pa
msg <-
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16589#discussion_r96289817
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/install.R ---
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
#' }
#' @param overwrite If \code{TRUE}, download and overwrite the existing
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71560/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71558/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
**[Test build #71558 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71558/testReport)**
for PR 16503 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
**[Test build #71560 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71560/testReport)**
for PR 16503 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14204
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71557/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user nblintao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14204#discussion_r96568190
--- Diff:
core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/executorspage.js ---
@@ -408,12 +420,17 @@ $(document).ready(function () {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71556/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14204
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
**[Test build #71556 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71556/testReport)**
for PR 15125 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14204
**[Test build #71557 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71557/testReport)**
for PR 14204 at commit
1 - 100 of 686 matches
Mail list logo
