Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16684
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308#discussion_r97490521
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DateFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -475,6 +1164,45 @@ class DateFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138#discussion_r97490239
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -1047,6 +1048,64 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16687
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71914/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16687
**[Test build #71914 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71914/testReport)**
for PR 16687 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16687
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138#discussion_r97489950
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -1047,6 +1048,64 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71910/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
**[Test build #71910 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71910/testReport)**
for PR 16552 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71913/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
**[Test build #71913 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71913/testReport)**
for PR 16138 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
**[Test build #71921 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71921/testReport)**
for PR 16594 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71908/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
**[Test build #71908 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71908/testReport)**
for PR 16269 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16654
Existing metrics (WSSSE,Loglikelihood) are relevant to detail of algorithm.
Computation of WSSSE for KMeans/BisectKMeans use the average vectors as the
centers, but for KMedoids the medoids,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16553
Thank you @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16658
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16658
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71915/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16658
**[Test build #71915 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71915/testReport)**
for PR 16658 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16687#discussion_r97483845
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/JobGenerator.scala
---
@@ -146,6 +147,11 @@ class JobGenerator(jobScheduler:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16687#discussion_r97483687
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContextSuite.scala
---
@@ -837,6 +839,29 @@ class StreamingContextSuite extends
GitHub user titicaca opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
SPARK-19342 bug fixed in collect method for collecting timestamp column
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix a bug in collect method for collecting timestamp column,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
**[Test build #71920 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71920/testReport)**
for PR 16552 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16688
**[Test build #71919 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71919/testReport)**
for PR 16688 at commit
GitHub user dilipbiswal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16688
[TESTS][SQL] Setup testdata at the beginning for tests to run independently
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In CachedTableSuite, we are not setting up the test data
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
**[Test build #71918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71918/testReport)**
for PR 16552 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
**[Test build #71917 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71917/testReport)**
for PR 15945 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16658
**[Test build #71915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71915/testReport)**
for PR 16658 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594#discussion_r97482084
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -54,11 +56,32 @@ case class Statistics(
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308#discussion_r97482071
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DateFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -103,6 +153,51 @@ class DateFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
**[Test build #71916 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71916/testReport)**
for PR 15880 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16683
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
cc @yanboliang @sethah @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
It seems to me following hive is safer, any other ideas?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
LGTM, pending tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16683
Thanks. Merging to master and 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16687
**[Test build #71914 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71914/testReport)**
for PR 16687 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594#discussion_r97481455
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -54,11 +56,32 @@ case class Statistics(
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16687
[SPARK-19343][DStreams] Do once optimistic checkpoint before stop
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Streaming job restarts from checkpoint, and it will rebuild several
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
@liancheng ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16553
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
@gatorsmile I just did a quick fix to show how the improved stats look
like. If @rxin @hvanhovell accept the change proposed in this pr, I'll update
to remove the flag :)
---
If your project is set
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552#discussion_r97481030
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -1461,6 +1461,25 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16553
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552#discussion_r97480933
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ddl.scala ---
@@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ case class CreateTempViewUsing(
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552#discussion_r97480861
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -112,12 +112,6 @@ case class
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16582#discussion_r97478738
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -337,17 +350,20 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16582#discussion_r97479049
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -274,25 +277,28 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #71911 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71911/testReport)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71911/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16661#discussion_r97479326
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/GaussianMixture.scala ---
@@ -486,6 +491,9 @@ class GaussianMixture @Since("2.0.0") (
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
I still do not think using an internal configuration is a user friendly way
to show the plan costs. Using this way, we do not want users to see it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594#discussion_r97478978
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -54,11 +56,32 @@ case class Statistics(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71906/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71905/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
**[Test build #71906 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71906/testReport)**
for PR 16594 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71904/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
**[Test build #71904 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71904/testReport)**
for PR 16638 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
**[Test build #71905 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71905/testReport)**
for PR 16677 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
**[Test build #71913 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71913/testReport)**
for PR 16138 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16661#discussion_r97478414
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/GaussianMixture.scala ---
@@ -486,6 +491,9 @@ class GaussianMixture @Since("2.0.0") (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71907/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
**[Test build #71907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71907/testReport)**
for PR 15880 at commit
Github user anabranch commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
@cloud-fan - Reynold referred me to your for this test failure.
My two tests are failing because Hive tests *allegedly* cover something
like this.
```
SELECT
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
**[Test build #71912 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71912/testReport)**
for PR 16606 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71909/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #71909 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71909/testReport)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #71911 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71911/testReport)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
LGTM
The PR title is not right. BTW, we might need a release note for this PR.
This will change the behaviors.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
@MLnick @jkbradley Could you mind making a final pass?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user anabranch commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
@felixcheung Thank you for your feedback! Small request, can you tell me if
my R test case is sufficient for this? It doesn't seem like there is extensive
R testing right now for virtually any
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71902/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
**[Test build #71902 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71902/testReport)**
for PR 16606 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
**[Test build #71910 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71910/testReport)**
for PR 16552 at commit
Github user smurching commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14872
No worries, apologies for being busy on my end -- I'll leave the branch up
& try to contribute in other ways when I have the time!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #71909 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71909/testReport)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16668#discussion_r97475352
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3406,3 +3406,28 @@ setMethod("randomSplit",
}
sapply(sdfs, dataFrame)
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16668#discussion_r97475188
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3406,3 +3406,28 @@ setMethod("randomSplit",
}
sapply(sdfs, dataFrame)
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16668#discussion_r97474262
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3406,3 +3406,28 @@ setMethod("randomSplit",
}
sapply(sdfs, dataFrame)
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16668#discussion_r97473647
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3406,3 +3406,28 @@ setMethod("randomSplit",
}
sapply(sdfs, dataFrame)
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16679
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16679
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16679
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71900/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16679
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
**[Test build #71908 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71908/testReport)**
for PR 16269 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16679
**[Test build #71900 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71900/testReport)**
for PR 16679 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638#discussion_r97471913
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -81,8 +81,8 @@ statement
rowFormat?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
**[Test build #71907 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71907/testReport)**
for PR 15880 at commit
1 - 100 of 650 matches
Mail list logo
