Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16690
Jenkins, ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
**[Test build #71935 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71935/testReport)**
for PR 16605 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r97406162
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1218,7 +1225,9 @@ class DAGScheduler(
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r97586026
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1193,7 +1193,14 @@ class DAGScheduler(
}
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r97417513
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -648,4 +648,69 @@ class BasicSchedulerIntegrationSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r97417399
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -648,4 +648,69 @@ class BasicSchedulerIntegrationSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16661
**[Test build #71937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71937/testReport)**
for PR 16661 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71933/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
**[Test build #71933 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71933/testReport)**
for PR 16693 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329#discussion_r97580048
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/JavaUserDefinedTypedAggregation.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user gmoehler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660
@viirya Which comment are you referring to? I thought i had included all of
them ;-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
**[Test build #71936 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71936/testReport)**
for PR 16677 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71932/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
**[Test build #71932 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71932/testReport)**
for PR 16269 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16661#discussion_r97571098
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/GaussianMixture.scala ---
@@ -486,6 +491,9 @@ class GaussianMixture @Since("2.0.0") (
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16661#discussion_r97570174
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/GaussianMixture.scala ---
@@ -486,6 +491,9 @@ class GaussianMixture @Since("2.0.0") (
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
**[Test build #71934 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71934/testReport)**
for PR 16605 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
thanks @paragpc
merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
**[Test build #71935 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71935/testReport)**
for PR 16605 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14918
I do not agree with this change too by the same reason in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14918#issuecomment-250882422.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16614
**[Test build #3549 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3549/testReport)**
for PR 16614 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71934/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
**[Test build #71934 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71934/testReport)**
for PR 16605 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308#discussion_r97556081
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DateFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -475,6 +1164,45 @@ class DateFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308#discussion_r97554829
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DateFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -475,6 +1164,45 @@ class DateFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71931/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
**[Test build #71931 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71931/testReport)**
for PR 16677 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
**[Test build #71933 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71933/testReport)**
for PR 16693 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
cc @gatorsmile @windpiger
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
[SPARK-19152][SQL][followup] simplify CreateHiveTableAsSelectCommand
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552 ,
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660
LGTM except one minor comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97545280
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +73,104 @@ object UDT {
}
+// object and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16691
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71930/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16691
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16691
**[Test build #71930 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71930/testReport)**
for PR 16691 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
**[Test build #71932 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71932/testReport)**
for PR 16269 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71928/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16668#discussion_r97537116
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3406,3 +3406,28 @@ setMethod("randomSplit",
}
sapply(sdfs, dataFrame)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
**[Test build #71928 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71928/testReport)**
for PR 16680 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
I have updated the PR title and description, and added a release_notes
label in the ticket.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71929/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660
**[Test build #71929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71929/testReport)**
for PR 16660 at commit
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97534883
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -194,4 +293,35 @@ class UserDefinedTypeSuite extends QueryTest
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15837
Close this as alternative one #16659 is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15837
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
**[Test build #71931 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71931/testReport)**
for PR 16677 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16692
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16614
**[Test build #3549 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3549/testReport)**
for PR 16614 at commit
GitHub user kevinyu98 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16692
[SPARK-19335] Introduce UPSERT feature to SPARK
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to add the UPSERT feature support into SPARK through
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16661#discussion_r97530588
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/GaussianMixture.scala ---
@@ -486,6 +491,9 @@ class GaussianMixture @Since("2.0.0") (
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12380
Isn't this just one-hot encoding? Spark has had this for a long time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652
This is looking OK to me, but it needs a (squash, optionally, and) rebase
now before it can test again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16654
Sure, and classification metrics like AUC only make sense for classifiers
that output more than just a label -- they have to output a probability or
score of some kind. Not every metric necessarily
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16676
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16658
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16676
Merged to master. Please read http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html for
next time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16658
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355
Done, and it synced now. Merged to master/2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355
It's an apache-github sync issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/commits/branch-2.1
is missing the latest commit from
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71926/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
**[Test build #71926 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71926/testReport)**
for PR 15945 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71925/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
**[Test build #71925 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71925/testReport)**
for PR 16552 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71924/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71922/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
**[Test build #71924 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71924/testReport)**
for PR 15880 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
**[Test build #71922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71922/testReport)**
for PR 16606 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71923/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16656#discussion_r97519002
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -536,6 +539,7 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
**[Test build #71923 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71923/testReport)**
for PR 16552 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97518422
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -194,4 +293,35 @@ class UserDefinedTypeSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16691
**[Test build #71930 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71930/testReport)**
for PR 16691 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16691#discussion_r97518189
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
---
@@ -422,16 +423,36 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc:
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16691
[SPARK-19349][DStreams] Check resource ready to avoid multiple receivers to
be scheduled on the same node.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
remove related TODO
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660
**[Test build #71929 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71929/testReport)**
for PR 16660 at commit
Github user gmoehler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660
Thanks for the valuable (and fast!) comments - i have worked them in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97512560
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -194,4 +293,35 @@ class UserDefinedTypeSuite extends QueryTest
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
**[Test build #71928 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71928/testReport)**
for PR 16680 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16676
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16676
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71927/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16676
**[Test build #71927 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71927/testReport)**
for PR 16676 at commit
Github user titicaca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
Sure. Shall I add the tests in pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689#discussion_r97508643
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1136,9 +1136,17 @@ setMethod("collect",
# Note that "binary" columns behave like
301 - 400 of 457 matches
Mail list logo
