Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16690
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user jinxing64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16690
[SPARK-19347] ReceiverSupervisorImpl can add block to ReceiverTracker
multiple times because of askWithRetry.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
Oh. it was all written in the PR description... I removed my uesless
comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
yes spark-18285
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/SPARK-18285
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97504006
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +73,104 @@ object UDT {
}
+// object
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97503551
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +73,104 @@ object UDT {
}
+// object
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97503371
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +73,104 @@ object UDT {
}
+// object
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97503434
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +73,104 @@ object UDT {
}
+// object
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
LGTM. @zhengruifeng did you manage to add a JIRA for exposing multi-col
support in SparkR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
(I might be wrong but was suspecting that it returns `NA` first as
`logical` when we collect via `SerDe.scala` and then it ends up `numeric` due
to the type coercion when `NA` is located first
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97500817
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +73,104 @@ object UDT {
}
+// object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16676
**[Test build #71927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71927/testReport)**
for PR 16676 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16676
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16661#discussion_r97499446
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/GaussianMixture.scala ---
@@ -272,6 +277,10 @@ class GaussianMixture private (
}
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16687
cc @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
Oh @felixcheung , I was writing a comment but I just saw you. I was looking
into this for my curiosity.
Isn't this due to R type coercion rule with POSIXlt?
```r
>
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97498083
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +73,104 @@ object UDT {
}
+// object
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97498043
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -20,13 +20,15 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql
import
Github user gmoehler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16660#discussion_r97498057
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +73,104 @@ object UDT {
}
+// object
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
Thanks! I can verify this case and the fix.
Could you please add some tests for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
**[Test build #71926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71926/testReport)**
for PR 15945 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user samkum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16387
Hi,
No, I havent test this with out the ExternalAppendOnlyMap fix if this is
what you are asking. I tested it with changes to both the classes:
TaskMemoryManager and
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896
Reviving after a hiatus. Updated since tags. I've actually recently come
across a number of users hitting this issue in production and are unable to use
ALS with cross-validation as a result.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16663
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16663
merged to master and 2.1.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14907
We exposed `JdbcUtils.resultSetToRows`, but forgot to add a test case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
**[Test build #71925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71925/testReport)**
for PR 16552 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138#discussion_r97493826
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1177,6 +1177,9 @@ test_that("column functions", {
c17 <- cov(c, c1) + cov("c", "c1") +
Github user gczsjdy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476
ping @rxin @gatorsmile @tejasapatil @viirya
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
**[Test build #71924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71924/testReport)**
for PR 15880 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
**[Test build #71923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71923/testReport)**
for PR 16552 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
**[Test build #71922 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71922/testReport)**
for PR 16606 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138#discussion_r97492683
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -1746,7 +1750,7 @@ setMethod("toRadians",
#' to_date(df$c)
#' to_date(df$c, '-MM-dd')
#' }
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552#discussion_r97492625
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ddl.scala ---
@@ -65,6 +65,11 @@ case class CreateTempViewUsing(
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552#discussion_r97492569
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ddl.scala ---
@@ -65,6 +65,11 @@ case class CreateTempViewUsing(
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16668#discussion_r97492412
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3406,3 +3406,28 @@ setMethod("randomSplit",
}
sapply(sdfs, dataFrame)
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
The failed test is `udf5.q` in `HiveComparisonTest`, but I can't find
`SELECT to_date('2001-10-30 10:30:00', '')` in it, can you point out where we
write such a test?
---
If your project is set
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
@anabranch right, since there is little work done on the R side and this is
mostly a pass through, just checking if the functions are callable without
error like the test you have added should
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71918/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16688
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71921/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71917/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71916/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71920/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16606
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71912/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16688
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71919/
Test FAILed.
---
401 - 457 of 457 matches
Mail list logo
