Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72473 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72473/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16376
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16376
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72477/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16376
**[Test build #72477 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72477/testReport)**
for PR 16376 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11760
Great thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
how about we add a new SQL command to refresh the table schema in metastore
by inferring schema with data files? This is a compatibility issue and we
should have provided a way for users to
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
> I'll double check, but I don't think
spark.sql.hive.manageFilesourcePartitions=false would solve this issue since
we're still deriving the file relation's dataSchema parameter from the schema
of
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
@mridulm yeah once I saw this it seemed like something that's probably been
a lurking issue for a bunch of jobs!! Will be great to get this fixed --
thanks for finding it @jinxing64!
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #72482 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72482/testReport)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16495
@mhmoudr Will you be able to update this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737#discussion_r99732168
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/text/TextSuite.scala
---
@@ -125,6 +124,25 @@ class TextSuite extends
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16814
@jkbradley, @srowen Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737#discussion_r99732105
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/text/TextSuite.scala
---
@@ -125,6 +124,25 @@ class TextSuite extends
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16747
^ I want to be very sure if we are not going to expose this or not. Could
any SQL committer guy or PMC confirm this?
> `CalendarIntervalType` only for compatibility with similar type in
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16814
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72478/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16814
Btw, do you have a need to backport this to previous releases? Or is
master sufficient?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72478 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72478/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16814
LGTM
Merging with master
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72481 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72481/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user terma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16747
@srowen As I understood ```CalendarIntervalType``` only for compatibility
with similar type in ```Hive```. So probably better to mark it as internal and
close jira?
---
If your project is set up
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72475/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #72475 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72475/testReport)**
for PR 15009 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737#discussion_r99730718
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/source/libsvm/LibSVMOptions.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
LGTM, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72480 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72480/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
PR has been amended to reflect feedback. Thanks for taking a look, @brkyvz.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user GavinGavinNo1 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11760
@kayousterhout Sorry that I tried before but internet connection is poor in
my company and then I forget. I'll work on it back home today or tomorrow.
Thank you for caring for this PR.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72474/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
**[Test build #72474 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72474/testReport)**
for PR 16783 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824#discussion_r99729087
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -51,8 +51,10 @@ def toDF(self, schema=None, sampleRatio=None):
:param samplingRatio: the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824#discussion_r99728911
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -553,10 +594,10 @@ def repartition(self, numPartitions, *cols):
+---+-+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72476/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
**[Test build #72476 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72476/testReport)**
for PR 16737 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824#discussion_r99728558
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -296,8 +312,10 @@ def show(self, n=20, truncate=True):
If set to a number greater than
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824#discussion_r99728503
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -247,9 +261,11 @@ def explain(self, extended=False):
:param extended: boolean,
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
@kayousterhout That sounds more clear, and I can see this being a problem
(and probably explains some hung jobs I had seen a while earlier), thanks !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824#discussion_r99727122
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -233,11 +245,13 @@ def schema(self):
def printSchema(self):
"""Prints out the
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
@Yunni I'm on travel at Spark Summit East these days, and will review after
the summit. Thanks for your patience.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824#discussion_r99727033
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -218,8 +228,10 @@ def writeStream(self):
def schema(self):
"""Returns the schema
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16825
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72472/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16825
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16825
**[Test build #72472 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72472/testReport)**
for PR 16825 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72479 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72479/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r99724943
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -66,7 +100,8 @@ private[spark] object TaskDescription {
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r99725005
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -243,27 +245,42 @@ class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72478 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72478/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
> Should we roll these behaviors into one flag? e.g.
```spark.sql.hive.mixedCaseSchemaSupport```
That sounds reasonable to me. The only thing I wonder about is if there's
any use case where
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744#discussion_r99718950
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisReceiver.scala
---
@@ -35,10 +36,65 @@ import
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16741
Thanks for these many cleanups! It's a shame to lose links. Do you think
we should use fully qualified names rather than abandoning the links?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744#discussion_r99718545
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/KinesisExampleUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16376
**[Test build #72477 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72477/testReport)**
for PR 16376 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11760
@GavinGavinNo1 if you don't have time to work on this PR, can you close it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15326
@erenavsarogullari what's the status of this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15604
@erenavsarogullari what's the status with this PR? I know you have at
least one other fair scheduler PR outstanding, and it makes reviews easier to
minimize the number of outstanding things
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16376
@squito I just noticed this hasn't been merged. Is this good to go pending
tests passing again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16376
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99716361
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -69,19 +72,29 @@ private[spark] class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99717574
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -69,19 +72,29 @@ private[spark] class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99717754
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PoolSuite.scala ---
@@ -201,6 +202,49 @@ class PoolSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99717324
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -69,19 +72,29 @@ private[spark] class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99712707
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PoolSuite.scala ---
@@ -28,19 +29,19 @@ import org.apache.spark.scheduler.SchedulingMode._
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16740
Regarding the tests - I don't think the tests should change _depending on_
the implementation. I don't think it's valid to say that we don't need to test
this thoroughly because we know that it's
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744#discussion_r99713106
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisReceiver.scala
---
@@ -35,10 +36,65 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
**[Test build #72476 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72476/testReport)**
for PR 16737 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824#discussion_r99711908
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1191,6 +1287,12 @@ def dropna(self, how='any', thresh=None,
subset=None):
This
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744#discussion_r99711844
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisTestUtils.scala
---
@@ -205,6 +205,8 @@ private[kinesis] object
Github user kunalkhamar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Hey @zsxwing
Can you take another look and let me know if anything needs changes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16740
@actuaryzhang the changes look good to me. I had some nit-picks which you
marked as won't fix, and I'm ok with that. Thank you for fixing this issue!
Maybe a committer can review this -
GitHub user kunalkhamar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Fork SparkSession with option to inherit a copy of the SessionState.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Forking a newSession() from SparkSession currently makes a new
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
**[Test build #72474 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72474/testReport)**
for PR 16783 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #72475 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72475/testReport)**
for PR 15009 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72463/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762
cc @srinathshankar @sameeragarwal @hvanhovell @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99660324
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -391,17 +391,18 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99659930
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -519,6 +520,18 @@ class TestTaskScheduler(sc:
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99661979
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -648,4 +661,70 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72471/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99660627
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -648,4 +661,70 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722
**[Test build #72471 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72471/testReport)**
for PR 16722 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744#discussion_r99709988
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/KinesisExampleUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Hi @budde, taking a look at this now. Sorry for the wait
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72463 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72463/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
> I'll double check, but I don't think
spark.sql.hive.manageFilesourcePartitions=false would solve this issue since
we're still deriving the file relation's dataSchema parameter from the schema
of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16825
**[Test build #72472 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72472/testReport)**
for PR 16825 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72473 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72473/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16740
@sethah @imatiach-msft Could you take another look and let me know if there
are any additional changes needed on this PR? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16825
Avoid leak SparkContext in Signaling.cancelOnInterrupt
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Signaling.cancelOnInterrupt` leaks a SparkContext per call and it makes
101 - 200 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
