Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72470/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625
**[Test build #72470 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72470/testReport)**
for PR 16625 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72469/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72468/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
The current failure about `ExtendedYarnTest` came from `mesos` module . It
seems to be irrelevant to this PR. Let me check that.
```
[info] Running Spark tests using Maven with these
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
**[Test build #72468 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72468/testReport)**
for PR 16650 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #72469 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72469/testReport)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72465 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72465/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72465/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72466/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
**[Test build #72466 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72466/testReport)**
for PR 16650 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72467/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72467 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72467/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user evilezh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949
any update on this. It is real pain with driver ? As i see patch is ready
.. question is about when yo merge ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99686720
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -69,19 +72,29 @@ private[spark] class
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99686323
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -69,19 +72,29 @@ private[spark] class
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813
Looks reasonable, but I'd prefer slightly different log messages.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99681895
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99681470
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99681098
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99680917
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -168,6 +168,43 @@ case class AlterTableRenameCommand(
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99680331
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99680029
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99679303
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99679239
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99679185
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -763,7 +763,9 @@ object DDLUtils {
val HIVE_PROVIDER =
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795#discussion_r99678662
--- Diff: sql/core/pom.xml ---
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@
test
+ org.apache.avro
--- End diff --
@srowen
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99678116
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99677955
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -763,7 +763,9 @@ object DDLUtils {
val HIVE_PROVIDER =
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
Thanks! Merging to master/2.1/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821#discussion_r99676254
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ExpressionParserSuite.scala
---
@@ -298,6 +298,8 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722
**[Test build #72471 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72471/testReport)**
for PR 16722 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
The release notes are for end users, and this doesn't impact end users.
Developers are expected, more or less, to follow commits and dev@ to keep up
with changes like this.
---
If your project is
Github user drcrallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
FYI, we have a build process that packages spark core, now that mesos is is
in its own artifact, this broke our build and deploy process, and its not
called out in release notes
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72464/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72464 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72464/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99670310
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/DecisionTreeClassifier.scala
---
@@ -106,14 +122,18 @@ class DecisionTreeClassifier
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625
**[Test build #72470 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72470/testReport)**
for PR 16625 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99668948
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LabeledPoint.scala ---
@@ -35,4 +35,11 @@ case class LabeledPoint(@Since("2.0.0") label: Double,
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99668686
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -590,8 +599,8 @@ private[spark] object RandomForest extends Logging {
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625#discussion_r99668339
--- Diff: docs/security.md ---
@@ -49,10 +49,6 @@ component-specific configuration namespaces used to
override the default setting
Component
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99666983
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/TreeTests.scala ---
@@ -124,8 +129,8 @@ private[ml] object TreeTests extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #72469 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72469/testReport)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625#discussion_r99667702
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1797,6 +1797,20 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99667381
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/DecisionTreeClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -351,6 +370,36 @@ class
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r9967
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/MLTestingUtils.scala ---
@@ -281,10 +283,26 @@ object MLTestingUtils extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
I'll double check, but I don't think
```spark.sql.hive.manageFilesourcePartitions=false``` would solve this issue
since we're still deriving the file relation's dataSchema parameter from the
schema
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
@gatorsmile Yeah Sean. Actually most likely i will need to work out a
different schema than what i have currently for the generator tests. So i was
planning to add the negative scenarios and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
**[Test build #72468 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72468/testReport)**
for PR 16650 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99665910
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impurity/Variance.scala ---
@@ -70,17 +70,24 @@ object Variance extends Impurity {
* Note:
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99665188
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impurity/Impurity.scala ---
@@ -79,7 +79,12 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99664910
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -467,6 +469,52 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72467 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72467/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99664877
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impurity/Entropy.scala ---
@@ -83,23 +83,29 @@ object Entropy extends Impurity {
* @param
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99664273
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/DecisionTreeMetadata.scala
---
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16810
@srowen, I'll help with this. It turns out that we don't need to make any
Jenkins configuration changes for the pull request builder. For the master
branch builders, I've gone ahead and disabled
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99664044
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -467,6 +469,52 @@ class StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
**[Test build #72466 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72466/testReport)**
for PR 16650 at commit
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99661763
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -456,4 +461,69 @@ class BlacklistTrackerSuite extends
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Amending this PR to upgrade the KCL/AWS SDK dependencies to more-current
versions (1.7.3 and 1.11.76, respectively). The
```RegionUtils.getRegionByEndpoint()``` API was removed from the SDK, so I've
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72465 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72465/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99661191
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -467,6 +469,51 @@ class
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99660908
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -467,6 +469,51 @@ class
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99660755
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -600,6 +603,16 @@ class
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99660675
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -489,6 +491,29 @@ class
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99660704
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99660453
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99659988
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72464 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72464/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
@dilipbiswal Are you planning to submit another PR for `Generators` or do
it in this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
Agree, though we are talking about duplicating 1 line of code in 3 nearby
places. It's not meaningfully duplicating anything.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72462/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16738
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
**[Test build #72462 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72462/testReport)**
for PR 16824 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72463 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72463/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16738
Merged this to master. Thanks for the fix @jinxing64 -- these fixes to
improve readability / usability of the code are super useful!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user pfcoperez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
@andrewor14 @srowen In any case, I just wanted to add that copying code is,
basically the worst strategy.
If you wanted to constraint the types for those tree and not just
**AnyVal**
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Oh, thank you, @liancheng !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72461/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
**[Test build #72461 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72461/testReport)**
for PR 16824 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
@dongjoon-hyun, you may add `[TEST-MAVEN]` in the PR title to ask Jenkins
to test this PR using Maven.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16791
Ah, thank you for confirming and the information!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
**[Test build #72462 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72462/testReport)**
for PR 16824 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
**[Test build #72461 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72461/testReport)**
for PR 16824 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16791
@HyukjinKwon Sorry that I didn't see your comment before this PR got
merged. I believe PARQUET-686 had already been fixed by apache/parquet-mr#367
but wasn't marked as resolved in JIRA. Thanks
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
@yanboliang, just a friendly reminder please don't forget to review the PR
when you have time. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72457/
Test PASSed.
---
201 - 300 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
