Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72622 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72622/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
**[Test build #72623 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72623/testReport)**
for PR 16854 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
Thanks but the R test removal is unnecessary but probably ideally should be
added back at some point. it was just parsing a sample URL - we should have one
to make sure we don't break with the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16837
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16837
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72617/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16837
**[Test build #72617 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72617/testReport)**
for PR 16837 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16750#discussion_r100225911
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/JsonExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -357,30 +361,70 @@ class
Github user zdh2292390 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16415
@jkbradley @srowen Hi, sorry to bother, it's been a lot time since last
discussion. Can you please tell me if there is a problem in my latest commit?
Thank you very much! Expect reply.
---
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16750#discussion_r100225669
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/JsonExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -357,30 +361,70 @@ class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16750#discussion_r100225659
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/JsonExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -357,30 +361,70 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
**[Test build #3570 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3570/testReport)**
for PR 16859 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r100225242
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -218,7 +247,14 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r100224399
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -218,7 +247,14 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72622 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72622/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
Should I delete my local master repository firstlyï¼and fork a new one
again? @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
LGTM, pending test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72614/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862
**[Test build #72614 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72614/testReport)**
for PR 16862 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
@budde Spark does support mixed-case-schema tables, and it has always been.
It's because we write table schema to metastore case-preserving, via table
properties. When we read a table, we get
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
**[Test build #72621 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72621/testReport)**
for PR 16760 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
btw I think you want `[test-maven]` to run the builder on maven. (last one
ran on sbt.)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
**[Test build #72620 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72620/testReport)**
for PR 16386 at commit
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100219153
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/input/PortableDataStream.scala ---
@@ -194,5 +195,8 @@ class PortableDataStream(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72619 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72619/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16864
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859#discussion_r100218630
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/protocol/MessageDecoder.java
---
@@ -35,6 +35,12 @@
private static
GitHub user Bcpoole opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16864
[SPARK-19527][Core] Approximate Size of Intersection of Bloom Filters
**What changes were proposed in this pull request?**
Added functions to get the Swamidass & Baldi (2007) approximation
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r100218129
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -218,7 +247,14 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72618/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
**[Test build #72618 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72618/testReport)**
for PR 16856 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100217653
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/input/PortableDataStream.scala ---
@@ -194,5 +195,8 @@ class PortableDataStream(
}
def
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72610/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #72610 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72610/testReport)**
for PR 15009 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72615/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user Bcpoole closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16863
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72615 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72615/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16863
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a
pull request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
**[Test build #72618 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72618/testReport)**
for PR 16856 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16863
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
@gatorsmile @cloud-fan Could you please look at this when you have time?
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user Bcpoole reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16863
Swamidass & Baldi Approximations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added functions to get the Swamidass & Baldi (2007) approximation for
number of items in a Bloom
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
several questions:
1. as `SparkSession` becomes the new entry point, now we require users to
include spark-sql module in their sbt file or pom.xml, which seems weird if
users only want
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856#discussion_r100213922
--- Diff: docs/programming-guide.md ---
@@ -244,13 +239,13 @@ use IPython, set the `PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON` variable
to `ipython` when running
$
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856#discussion_r100213837
--- Diff: docs/programming-guide.md ---
@@ -77,9 +76,9 @@ In addition, if you wish to access an HDFS cluster, you
need to add a dependency
Finally,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804#discussion_r100213581
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala ---
@@ -152,14 +152,39 @@ abstract class OrcSuite extends QueryTest
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
I read jkbradley's thoughts here, so I will modify this as following:
first we need 4 traits, using the following hierarchy:
LogisticRegressionSummary
Github user Bcpoole closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16863
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16837
**[Test build #72617 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72617/testReport)**
for PR 16837 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72606/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16863
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72613/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
**[Test build #72606 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72606/testReport)**
for PR 16826 at commit
GitHub user Bcpoole opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16863
Swamidass & Baldi Approximations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added functions to get the Swamidass & Baldi (2007) approximation for
number of items in a Bloom
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736#discussion_r100211955
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfEntrySuite.scala
---
@@ -171,4 +171,14 @@ class SQLConfEntrySuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800
**[Test build #72613 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72613/testReport)**
for PR 16800 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72616 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72616/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72615 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72615/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
Github user Bcpoole closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16861
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862
**[Test build #72614 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72614/testReport)**
for PR 16862 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72605/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72605 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72605/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862
[SPARK-19520][streaming] Do not encrypt data written to the WAL.
Spark's I/O encryption uses an ephemeral key for each driver instance.
So driver B cannot decrypt data written by driver A since
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862
@tdas @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72604/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
**[Test build #72604 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72604/testReport)**
for PR 16804 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72611/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72603/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415
**[Test build #72611 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72611/testReport)**
for PR 15415 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
**[Test build #72603 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72603/testReport)**
for PR 16386 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16825#discussion_r100206338
--- Diff: repl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/Signaling.scala ---
@@ -28,15 +28,17 @@ private[repl] object Signaling extends Logging {
* when
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16825#discussion_r100206125
--- Diff: repl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/Signaling.scala ---
@@ -28,15 +28,17 @@ private[repl] object Signaling extends Logging {
* when
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16830
**[Test build #3569 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3569/testReport)**
for PR 16830 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16852
**[Test build #3568 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3568/testReport)**
for PR 16852 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16861
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72608/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800
**[Test build #72608 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72608/testReport)**
for PR 16800 at commit
GitHub user Bcpoole opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16861
Added function to get union of 2 Bloom filters (no mutation). Added Sâ¦
â¦wamidass & Baldi approximations for number of items in a Bloom filter
and for the intersection of 2 Bloom filters given
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800
**[Test build #72613 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72613/testReport)**
for PR 16800 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16860
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16860
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72607/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16860
**[Test build #72607 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72607/testReport)**
for PR 16860 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72609/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72609 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72609/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72612/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72612 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72612/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
101 - 200 of 614 matches
Mail list logo
