Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72602/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
**[Test build #72602 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72602/testReport)**
for PR 16760 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
**[Test build #72597 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72597/testReport)**
for PR 16858 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
**[Test build #72602 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72602/testReport)**
for PR 16760 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844#discussion_r100170698
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -695,11 +690,16 @@ public boolean append(Object kbase, long koff, int
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844#discussion_r100170278
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -695,11 +690,16 @@ public boolean append(Object kbase, long koff, int
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
Oh, wait a moment. The Jenkins on last commit will succeed soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
OK merging this as it's a fix for the build
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72601/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
**[Test build #72601 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72601/testReport)**
for PR 16386 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72600/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
**[Test build #72600 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72600/testReport)**
for PR 16857 at commit
Github user NathanHowell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
I rebased to master and hopefully addressed all of your comments
@cloud-fan, please have another look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
**[Test build #72601 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72601/testReport)**
for PR 16386 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
**[Test build #72600 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72600/testReport)**
for PR 16857 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72595/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
**[Test build #72595 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72595/testReport)**
for PR 16858 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72596/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
**[Test build #72599 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72599/testReport)**
for PR 16859 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Oh, indeed. Thank you for informing that, too!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
The only failure is irrelevant to this PR, ad also the very next Jenkins
pass the test.
```
[info] KafkaSourceSuite:
...
[info] - subscribing topic by pattern with topic
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
FYI, I'm fixing OOM in #16825
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
**[Test build #3567 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3567/testReport)**
for PR 16858 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
I still don't think this answered my last questions? yes, I understand all
this back story. That's why this is taking such a large amount of everyone's
time. The purpose and discussion and commits
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
**[Test build #72596 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72596/testReport)**
for PR 16858 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Still waiting reviews for this. Anyone? Ideally before my forthcoming Spark
Summit talk...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Oh, sorry! I misread your comment, `doubt`.
For the ReplSuite, #16859 looks related.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
Hi, @zsxwing .
Currently, SparkPullRequestBuilder is broken and HOTFIX is #16858 .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Are you asking me? I meant Spark 2.1. Those test errors are not new, that's
what I'm saying.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72598/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
**[Test build #72598 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72598/testReport)**
for PR 16859 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
You mean `avro` or prior `parquet`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
> So far, ReplSuite failures are observed. One is OOM...
I ran into those issues while testing the 2.1 RCs, so I doubt it's caused
by your change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
**[Test build #72598 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72598/testReport)**
for PR 16859 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
So far, **ReplSuite** failures are observed. One is OOM and the other is
the other is ClosureCleaner. Both happens after the testcase, `define case
class and create Dataset together with
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859#discussion_r100159293
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/TransportChannelHandler.java
---
@@ -48,7 +47,7 @@
* on the channel
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859#discussion_r100159049
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2599,14 +2599,10 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
[SPARK-17714][Core][maven]Avoid using ExecutorClassLoader to load Netty
generated classes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Netty's `MessageToMessageEncoder` uses
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16850
Merged. Could you close this PR, please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16850
LGTM. Merging to 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16740
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16495
Thanks @mhmoudr
As far as the stress test, I'd recommend posting instructions as a Github
gist and linking it to wherever you post results on JIRA or a PR. We wouldn't
want to add a model (a
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776#discussion_r100138230
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -63,44 +63,49 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776#discussion_r100138241
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -63,44 +63,49 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776#discussion_r100138206
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -63,44 +63,49 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
**[Test build #72597 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72597/testReport)**
for PR 16858 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
Thank you for review, @srowen . Also, since it touches R now, cc
@felixcheung .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16740
LGTM
Merging with master
Thank you + @sethah for reviewing!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
I removed those lines, too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100137039
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_utils.R ---
@@ -232,9 +232,9 @@ test_that("basenameSansExtFromUrl", {
x <-
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100136174
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_utils.R ---
@@ -232,9 +232,9 @@ test_that("basenameSansExtFromUrl", {
x <-
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
**[Test build #72596 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72596/testReport)**
for PR 16858 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844
**[Test build #3566 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3566/testReport)**
for PR 16844 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100135299
--- Diff: dev/run-tests-jenkins.py ---
@@ -165,12 +165,6 @@ def main():
if "test-maven" in ghprb_pull_title:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844
**[Test build #3566 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3566/testReport)**
for PR 16844 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100134776
--- Diff: dev/run-tests-jenkins.py ---
@@ -165,12 +165,6 @@ def main():
if "test-maven" in ghprb_pull_title:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100134410
--- Diff: dev/run-tests.py ---
@@ -505,14 +505,14 @@ def main():
# if we're on the Amplab Jenkins build servers setup variables
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100134493
--- Diff: dev/run-tests-jenkins.py ---
@@ -165,12 +165,6 @@ def main():
if "test-maven" in ghprb_pull_title:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100134388
--- Diff: dev/run-tests.py ---
@@ -505,14 +505,14 @@ def main():
# if we're on the Amplab Jenkins build servers setup variables
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
> For better user experience, we should automatically infer the schema and
write it back to metastore, if there is no case-sensitive table schema in
metastore. This has the cost of detection the need
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100133896
--- Diff: dev/run-tests-jenkins.py ---
@@ -165,12 +165,6 @@ def main():
if "test-maven" in ghprb_pull_title:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100133412
--- Diff: dev/run-tests-jenkins.py ---
@@ -165,12 +165,6 @@ def main():
if "test-maven" in ghprb_pull_title:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
**[Test build #72595 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72595/testReport)**
for PR 16858 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100131333
--- Diff: dev/run-tests-jenkins.py ---
@@ -165,12 +165,6 @@ def main():
if "test-maven" in ghprb_pull_title:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
@srowen Could you review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
[SPARK-19464][BUILD][HOTFIX] run-tests should use hadoop2.6
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After SPARK-19464, SparkPullRequestBuilder fails because it still
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16387
@samkum the code is in this PR! Just revert the last two commits.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844
**[Test build #72594 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72594/testReport)**
for PR 16844 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72594/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844
@viirya Addressed your comment, also fixed another bug (updated PR
description).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844
**[Test build #72594 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72594/testReport)**
for PR 16844 at commit
Github user ooq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15193
Thanks for the patch @yaooqinn . As per comments for `getValueRow`, because
`getValueRow(id)` is always called after `getKeyRow(id)` with the same id, we
use `getValueFromKey(id) to retrieve value row
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Looks like Jenkins is failing to build any recent PR due to the following
error:
```[error] Could not find hadoop2.3 in the list. Valid options are
['hadoop2.6', 'hadoop2.7']```
I
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r100127337
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -218,7 +247,14 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72593/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72593 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72593/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Thank you for merging, @srowen .
Thank you for review, @vanzin , @liancheng , @jaceklaskowski , too!
I'm watching the build system on mockito hotfix. I believe it will become
stabler
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Amending the PR again to fix new dependency conflict in spark/pom.xml.
Thanks again for taking the time to review this, @brkyvz and @srowen. Please
let me know if you feel any additional changes are
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72593 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72593/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15193
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
**[Test build #3564 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3564/testReport)**
for PR 16853 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72592/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72592/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16850
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72586/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16850
**[Test build #72586 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72586/testReport)**
for PR 16850 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72592 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72592/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
301 - 400 of 614 matches
Mail list logo
