Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16850
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16850
**[Test build #3563 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3563/testReport)**
for PR 16850 at commit
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100104738
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -298,22 +312,22 @@ class JacksonParser(
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100103739
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -227,66 +267,71 @@ class JacksonParser(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16852
**[Test build #3565 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3565/testReport)**
for PR 16852 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16852
**[Test build #3565 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3565/testReport)**
for PR 16852 at commit
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100101464
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -160,7 +164,17 @@ public void writeTo(OutputStream out)
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100100641
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/input/PortableDataStream.scala ---
@@ -194,5 +195,8 @@ class PortableDataStream(
}
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100099791
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JSONOptions.scala
---
@@ -31,10 +31,17 @@ import
Github user GavinGavinNo1 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11760
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user GavinGavinNo1 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11760
@kayousterhout I got some problem with git conflict. So I create a new
branch and a new pull request. You may refer to
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855. And I close this pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100098008
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1764,4 +1769,125 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100097749
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonDataSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
GitHub user GavinGavinNo1 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855
[SPARK-13931] Resolve stage hanging up problem in a particular case
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When function 'executorLost' is invoked in class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user vitillo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
[SPARK-19517][SS] KafkaSource fails to initialize partition offsets
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes a bug in `KafkaSource` with the (de)serialization
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72591/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72591 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72591/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776#discussion_r100089611
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -63,44 +63,49 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72590/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856#discussion_r100089351
--- Diff: docs/programming-guide.md ---
@@ -77,9 +76,9 @@ In addition, if you wish to access an HDFS cluster, you
need to add a dependency
Finally, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
**[Test build #72590 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72590/testReport)**
for PR 16856 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856#discussion_r100089566
--- Diff: docs/programming-guide.md ---
@@ -244,13 +239,13 @@ use IPython, set the `PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON` variable
to `ipython` when running
$
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736#discussion_r100089378
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfEntrySuite.scala
---
@@ -164,6 +164,18 @@ class SQLConfEntrySuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
**[Test build #72590 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72590/testReport)**
for PR 16856 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72591 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72591/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736#discussion_r100089218
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntrySuite.scala ---
@@ -128,6 +128,25 @@ class ConfigEntrySuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
cc @sameeragarwal @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
[SPARK-19516][DOC] update public doc to use SparkSession instead of
SparkContext
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After Spark 2.0, `SparkSession` becomes the new
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72589/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72589 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72589/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72589 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72589/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
**[Test build #72588 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72588/testReport)**
for PR 16854 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72588/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16848
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user GavinGavinNo1 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
**[Test build #72588 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72588/testReport)**
for PR 16854 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16848
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
Let me try to add Java one and fix comments more tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72587/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user GavinGavinNo1 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855
[SPARK-13931] Resolve stage hanging up problem in a particular case
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When function 'executorLost' is invoked in class 'TaskSetManager',
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
**[Test build #72587 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72587/testReport)**
for PR 16804 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776#discussion_r100086037
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -63,44 +63,49 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
**[Test build #72587 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72587/testReport)**
for PR 16804 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
[SPARK-15463][SQL] Add an API to load DataFrame from Dataset[String]
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to add an API that loads `DataFrame` from
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804#discussion_r100085484
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala ---
@@ -162,6 +162,40 @@ abstract class OrcSuite extends QueryTest
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
@felixcheung @titicaca Just to make sure I understand, collect on timestamp
was getting `c("POSIXct", "POSIXt")` even before this change ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100083481
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1764,4 +1769,125 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16831
**[Test build #3562 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3562/testReport)**
for PR 16831 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100082372
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1764,4 +1769,125 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100081170
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonDataSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
**[Test build #3564 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3564/testReport)**
for PR 16853 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16850
**[Test build #72586 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72586/testReport)**
for PR 16850 at commit
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841#discussion_r100076749
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/subquery/in-subquery/in-having.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+-- Automatically generated by
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841#discussion_r100077204
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/subquery/in-subquery/in-joins.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
+-- Automatically generated by
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16850
**[Test build #3563 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3563/testReport)**
for PR 16850 at commit
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841#discussion_r100077423
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/subquery/in-subquery/in-multiple-columns.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+-- Automatically
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16850
jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
**[Test build #72585 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72585/testReport)**
for PR 16760 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72585/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
**[Test build #72585 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72585/testReport)**
for PR 16760 at commit
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72584/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72584 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72584/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72584 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72584/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787#discussion_r100070021
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveUtils.scala
---
@@ -463,117 +459,6 @@ private[spark] object HiveUtils extends Logging {
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16831
@squito
Many thanks for your help. You are so kind person : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16831
@jinxing64 that way of testing is fine, but I find its much faster to use
sbt.
http://www.scala-sbt.org/0.13/docs/Testing.html
```
build/sbt -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16848
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16848
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72577/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16848
**[Test build #72577 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72577/testReport)**
for PR 16848 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
**[Test build #72583 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72583/testReport)**
for PR 16853 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72583/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
**[Test build #72583 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72583/testReport)**
for PR 16853 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16837
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16837
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72578/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16837
**[Test build #72578 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72578/testReport)**
for PR 16837 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16810#discussion_r100065275
--- Diff: resource-managers/yarn/pom.xml ---
@@ -125,34 +125,12 @@
test
-
-
org.apache.hadoop
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
[SPARK-19464][BUILD][HOTFIX] Add back mockito test dep in YARN module, as
it ends up being required in a Maven build
Add back mockito test dep in YARN module, as it ends up being required in a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72580/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72580 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72580/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100064532
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -298,22 +312,22 @@ class JacksonParser(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100064266
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -227,66 +267,71 @@ class JacksonParser(
}
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16837
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100063010
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -160,7 +164,17 @@ public void writeTo(OutputStream out) throws
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16373
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
401 - 500 of 614 matches
Mail list logo
