GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16969
[SPARK-19639][SPARKR][Example]:Add spark.svmLinear example and update
vignettes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We recently add the spark.svmLinear API for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73017/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
**[Test build #73017 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73017/testReport)**
for PR 16964 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73024/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
**[Test build #73024 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73024/testReport)**
for PR 16826 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895
LGTM, I'll merge it in 1 or 2 days, if no one agains this API change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
**[Test build #73024 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73024/testReport)**
for PR 16826 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
Thanks, let me review further within tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101657416
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
+
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
definitely we should match the behavior of json
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962
**[Test build #73023 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73023/testReport)**
for PR 16962 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
@gatorsmile thanks for your good suggestionï½Usually I run the single test
case in IDEAï¼and let jenkins run testcases globalyï¼I will change the bad
behaviorï¼ thanks a lot!
---
If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962#discussion_r101656725
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/SaveIntoDataSourceCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774
@MLnick , I updated this PR:
* added unit tests
* added usage of parameter to examples
* updated ml-tuning.md documentation
* changed sliding window to a bounded semaphore to
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101655911
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/statsEstimation/FilterEstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,376 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101655854
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/statsEstimation/FilterEstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,376 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101655781
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/statsEstimation/FilterEstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,376 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
**[Test build #73022 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73022/testReport)**
for PR 16826 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101655531
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/statsEstimation/FilterEstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,376 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962#discussion_r101655346
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/util/DataFrameCallbackSuite.scala
---
@@ -159,4 +161,56 @@ class DataFrameCallbackSuite extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962
LGTM except three minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774
**[Test build #73021 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73021/testReport)**
for PR 16774 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73021/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962#discussion_r101655120
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -573,6 +575,21 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12524
@JoshRosen I haven't tried to walk through the logs in your JIRA comment,
but it wouldn't surprise me at all if this is the same issue that we've been
working through in
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774
> I think setting the default to match current behavior is best (i.e. 1).
I agree, just wanted to bring it up in case others had differing view since
it was a concern in the JIRA.
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15604
Hi @kayousterhout and @squito,
This PR is ready to re-review / merge if it is possible.
All feedbacks are welcome and thanks in advance ;)
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101654388
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz, @zsxwing â Any update here? Worried that this PR is starting to
languish.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101654075
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101653785
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962#discussion_r101653599
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/SaveIntoDataSourceCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101653079
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101652923
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101652394
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73015/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16966
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73018/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16966
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16966
**[Test build #73018 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73018/testReport)**
for PR 16966 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895
**[Test build #73015 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73015/testReport)**
for PR 16895 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101651517
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101651211
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101651143
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101650859
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101650369
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73014/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73014 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73014/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16968
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16968
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73020/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16968
**[Test build #73020 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73020/testReport)**
for PR 16968 at commit
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16968
[SPARK-19337] [ML] [Dcoc] Documentation and examples for LinearSVC
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Documentation and examples (Java, scala, python, R) for LinearSVC
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12524
Per [my comment on the
JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14658?focusedCommentId=15870777=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15870777),
I
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16968
**[Test build #73020 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73020/testReport)**
for PR 16968 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774
**[Test build #73021 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73021/testReport)**
for PR 16774 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16967
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user rolando opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16967
[MINOR][PYTHON] Fix typo docstring: 'top' -> 'topic'
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix typo in docstring.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73012/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962
**[Test build #73012 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73012/testReport)**
for PR 16962 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101645748
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
**[Test build #73019 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73019/testReport)**
for PR 15125 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
@dding3 I submitted a PR against your `cp2_pregel` branch. If you merge
that PR into your branch, it will be reflected in this PR. This is my PR:
https://github.com/dding3/spark/pull/1.
---
If
Github user dding3 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
Both are OK for me. Please let me know if any update needed from me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16965
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73016/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16965
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16965
**[Test build #73016 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73016/testReport)**
for PR 16965 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101643519
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101643302
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101643185
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16966
**[Test build #73018 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73018/testReport)**
for PR 16966 at commit
GitHub user Yunni opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16966
[SPARK-18409][ML]LSH approxNearestNeighbors should use approxQuantile
instead of sort
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In previous implementation of LSH
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101642526
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16949
re: security, this change doesn't really change anything; all this
information is already available in the UI. Note it doesn't expose the system
env (as in environment variables), although people
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101642131
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101641460
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
**[Test build #73017 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73017/testReport)**
for PR 16964 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73011/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101640636
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
**[Test build #73011 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73011/testReport)**
for PR 16964 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73008/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101639554
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101639364
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,623 @@
+/*
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
**[Test build #73008 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73008/testReport)**
for PR 13440 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101638863
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16534
Sure, I'll take another closer look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964#discussion_r101634309
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/SparkSaslSuite.java
---
@@ -255,21 +250,16 @@ public void
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964#discussion_r101630445
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/java/test/org/apache/spark/sql/JavaDataFrameSuite.java ---
@@ -352,24 +349,24 @@ public void testCountMinSketch() {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964#discussion_r101634185
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/network/crypto/AuthIntegrationSuite.java
---
@@ -163,20 +163,17 @@ void createServer(String
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73010/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #73010 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73010/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16947
**[Test build #3575 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3575/testReport)**
for PR 16947 at commit
201 - 300 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
