Github user radekg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608
@cherryii feel free to reach out if you need additional help. I'm sure your
issues can be sorted out.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73009/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962
**[Test build #73009 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73009/testReport)**
for PR 16962 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16965
**[Test build #73016 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73016/testReport)**
for PR 16965 at commit
GitHub user Yunni opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16965
[Spark-18450][ML] Scala API Change for LSH AND-amplification
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implemented a new Param numHashFunctions as the dimension of
AND-amplification
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895
**[Test build #73015 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73015/testReport)**
for PR 16895 at commit
Github user andrewor14 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13899
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13899
Closing for now; too many conflicts.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
+1, LGTM, too. Very tidy!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16961
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16961
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73013/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16961
**[Test build #73013 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73013/testReport)**
for PR 16961 at commit
Github user zzeekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7379
Same here. A Workaround is to build blocks and add them as equi-join
condition. But then you need to make an additional join on the following block
und coalesce the results.
---
If your project is
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
I've updated the PR based on feedback received. Changes from previous
commit:
- Fixed a couple indent issues
- Clarify some HiveSchemaInferenceSuite comments and general cleanup
- Add
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101625724
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -296,6 +296,21 @@ object SQLConf {
.longConf
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73014 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73014/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16961
+1 LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16961
**[Test build #73013 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73013/testReport)**
for PR 16961 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16961
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962
**[Test build #73012 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73012/testReport)**
for PR 16962 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962#discussion_r101622507
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -573,6 +575,24 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16623
Surely. This is a small enough change (one line) that we could revert
easily.
But just so I understand, this isn't just a behavior change per se - this
is the API not doing that is
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16949
@uncleGen As followup I'd recommend opening a JIRA to research and address
the potential security flaws in the env tab. I know we've already merged some
fixes to hide passwords in the env tab,
Github user robert3005 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16963
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r101618763
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -158,17 +160,7 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16246#discussion_r101618460
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -136,24 +140,35 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
**[Test build #73011 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73011/testReport)**
for PR 16964 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
[SPARK-19534][TESTS] Convert Java tests to use lambdas, Java 8 features
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Convert tests to use Java 8 lambdas, and modest related fixes to
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16690#discussion_r101616883
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/RpcEndpointRef.scala ---
@@ -75,10 +105,11 @@ private[spark] abstract class RpcEndpointRef(conf:
Github user ron8hu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Hi @cloud-fan I revised the code using latest Range class. Thanks for
reviewing the code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user cherryii commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608
@radekg, Thank you, I was starting to worry that is the case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user robert3005 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16963
[SPARK-19632] Non hive external catalogs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Open up ExternalCatalog and SessionState in order to allow integrating
other catalogs
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #73010 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73010/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
Github user kunalkhamar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
@rxin
The change from `SessionState(SparkSession,parentSessionState)` to
`SessionState(SparkSession,SQLConf,SessionCatalog,...)` is mostly done. Still
have 4 failing tests (OOMs) and will
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16947
**[Test build #3575 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3575/testReport)**
for PR 16947 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962#discussion_r101610336
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -211,13 +211,15 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962
**[Test build #73009 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73009/testReport)**
for PR 16962 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962
cc @salilsurendran @vanzin @gatorsmile @sameeragarwal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
**[Test build #73008 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73008/testReport)**
for PR 13440 at commit
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16962
[SPARK-18120 ][SQL] Call QueryExecutionListener callback methods for
DataFrameWriter methods
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We only notify `QueryExecutionListener`
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16945
I will add tests. Now I am looking for dataset other than iris to be used
in the document.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user radekg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608
It's not going to work with bridge network. The options will work fine with
host network. Bridge is a different story.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
@erikerlandson I am just helping clearing the stale PRs. :) I have no idea
whether they have intention to accept it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16960
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16960
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73005/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16960
**[Test build #73005 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73005/testReport)**
for PR 16960 at commit
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Sure. Will do.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101606197
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -186,8 +212,7 @@ private[hive] class
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101605728
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -296,6 +296,17 @@ object SQLConf {
.longConf
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101605711
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -163,6 +163,10 @@ case class BucketSpec(
* @param
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
> I think @mallman is saying he would merge changes to @dding3 branch
Yes, or I could do them in a follow up PR. Or @dding3 could do them without
my PR. I'm not hung up on getting credit.
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844#discussion_r101592592
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ public boolean append(Object kbase, long koff, int
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
i stopped the build as i need to restart jenkins... i'll retrigger this
when we're back up and running.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73006/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16960
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16960
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73004/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16960
**[Test build #73004 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73004/testReport)**
for PR 16960 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16947
> It also removes the runUninterruptibly hack from ``HDFSMetadata`
I will submit a backport PR for 2.1 to not include this change because this
is needed for 2.1 due to HADOOP-10622 (Master
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499#discussion_r101602604
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -813,7 +813,14 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16947#discussion_r101602345
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -250,53 +249,56 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499#discussion_r101602014
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -813,7 +813,14 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r101594561
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -40,19 +42,179 @@ abstract class PlanExpression[T <:
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r101596895
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/subquery.scala
---
@@ -83,29 +95,150 @@ object RewritePredicateSubquery
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r101590145
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -40,19 +42,179 @@ abstract class PlanExpression[T <:
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r101590658
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -40,19 +42,179 @@ abstract class PlanExpression[T <:
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r101593305
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -40,19 +42,179 @@ abstract class PlanExpression[T <:
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r101598818
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -365,17 +385,66 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16623
@felixcheung Just saw this was backported to 2.1.1. Since this is a
fairly significant behavioral change, I recommend we revert this backport. I
could imagine workloads working with EM but
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16961#discussion_r101597873
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/JavaSQLDataSourceExample.java
---
@@ -139,11 +139,9 @@ private static void
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16961#discussion_r101597431
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/JavaModelSelectionViaTrainValidationSplitExample.java
---
@@ -32,9 +32,6 @@
/**
*
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16961#discussion_r101597310
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/JavaLogQuery.java ---
@@ -40,7 +38,7 @@
*/
public final class JavaLogQuery {
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r101597685
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/subquery.scala
---
@@ -83,29 +95,150 @@ object RewritePredicateSubquery
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16961
[SPARK-19534][EXAMPLES] Convert Java tests to use lambdas, Java 8 features
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Convert Java tests to use lambdas, Java 8 features.
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r101597000
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SubquerySuite.scala
---
@@ -622,7 +622,12 @@ class SubquerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16957
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16957
Merged to master, as it's at worst a minor change to mima which makes it a
bit more consistent with scripts, and, likely resolves the build problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user cherryii commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608
I'm already using those three properties and the error I posted above is
what happens in bridge networking mode.
Note: I'm using spark-submit ... --conf spark.driver.port=$PORT0 etc...
[app
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857#discussion_r101594339
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -141,6 +143,104 @@ class KafkaSourceSuite
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857#discussion_r101594563
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -97,16 +100,29 @@ private[kafka010] class
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857#discussion_r101593021
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -88,6 +89,8 @@ private[kafka010] class
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857#discussion_r101594004
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -97,16 +100,29 @@ private[kafka010] class
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499#discussion_r101592331
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -1018,7 +1025,9 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
try {
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16947
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895#discussion_r101591685
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1364,10 +1364,11 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672#discussion_r101590857
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1816,4 +1816,123 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16946
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16946
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73007/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16946
**[Test build #73007 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73007/testReport)**
for PR 16946 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956#discussion_r101587263
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -645,17 +645,21 @@ class AstBuilder extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
I like this change.
To run unit test cases in your local environment, below are some common
commands when I develop Spark SQL
- To do the local style check
dev/lint-scala
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16946
**[Test build #73007 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73007/testReport)**
for PR 16946 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16946
@tgravescs pinging you since this is all YARN-side (doesn't really touch
the UI).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user radekg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608
No matter if you was to run this in bridge or host mode, the best idea
would be to request a number of ports. In case of `HOST` network only the
`port` needs to be requested. If you can use Marathon,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
**[Test build #73006 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73006/testReport)**
for PR 13440 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776
Thanks! Merging to master.
Please continue to finish the work
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19573
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
301 - 400 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
